Literature DB >> 19620828

Nerve injury in patients after hip and knee arthroplasties and knee arthroscopy.

Jennifer N Yacub1, J Bradford Rice, Timothy R Dillingham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the reporting of lower limb neuropathy within 90 days of surgery for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, or knee arthroscopy.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective study using data from the 1998 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounter Database (The MEDSTAT Group) to identify lower limb neuropathy after these surgeries. The sample was selected within the first 9 months of 1998 using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9), and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for hip and knee surgical procedures. Lower limb nerve injuries as determined by ICD-9 codes within 90 days postsurgery were the main outcome measures. The influence of diabetes on the rates of nerve injuries after surgery was also examined.
RESULTS: A total of 14,979 patients underwent these surgical procedures, 10 of whom were reported to have sustained a nerve injury postsurgery (0.07%). The sample comprised mainly men (53.1%), and the largest groups consisted of those aged 45-54 yrs (27.0%) and 55-64 yrs (27.7%). Nerve injury occurred at a rate of 0.03% after hip arthroplasty, 0.01% after knee arthroplasty, and 0.02% within 3 mos of arthroscopic knee surgery. Overall, nerve injuries were two times more prevalent in the diabetic vs. nondiabetic population (0.11% vs. 0.06%); however, this difference did not meet conventional levels of statistical significance. Specific to knee arthroplasty, there were 10-fold differences in nerve injury rates between diabetic and nondiabetic patients, 0.11% vs. 0.01%, respectively (P <or= 0.01), although the overall risks were small.
CONCLUSIONS: Nerve injuries after hip and knee arthroplasty and knee arthroscopy were rare in a large population of patients younger than 65 yrs. Although the overall rates were low, there was an increased occurrence of nerve injuries in the diabetic population. This information is useful when counseling patients and benchmarking surgical complication rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19620828      PMCID: PMC5063498          DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181ae0c9d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  23 in total

1.  Lesion of the common peroneal nerve during arthroscopy.

Authors:  Andrija Krivić; Sanda Stanec; Rado Zic; Srećko Budi; Rudolf Milanović; Zdenko Stanec
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  The course of the inferior gluteal nerve in the posterior approach to the hip.

Authors:  Z X Ling; V P Kumar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-12

3.  Transsection of the peroneal nerve complicating knee arthroscopy: case report and cadaver study.

Authors:  G Peicha; A Pascher; F Schwarzl; G Pierer; M Fellinger; J M Passler
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Complications in arthroscopy: the knee and other joints. Committee on Complications of the Arthroscopy Association of North America.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. Surgical technique.

Authors:  B Sonny Bal; Doug Haltom; Thomas Aleto; Matthew Barrett
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Common peroneal nerve palsy following knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  D S Johnson; D P Sharma; I H Bangash
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Peroneal-nerve palsy following total knee arthroplasty. A review of The Hospital for Special Surgery experience.

Authors:  H A Rose; R W Hood; J C Otis; C S Ranawat; J N Insall
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Neurovascular complications of knee arthroscopy.

Authors:  Tae Kyun Kim; Richard M Savino; Edward G McFarland; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Anesthetic, patient, and surgical risk factors for neurologic complications after prolonged total tourniquet time during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Terese T Horlocker; James R Hebl; Bhargavi Gali; Christopher J Jankowski; Christopher M Burkle; Daniel J Berry; Fernando A Zepeda; Susanna R Stevens; Darrell R Schroeder
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  The incidence of peripheral nerve injury in extremity trauma.

Authors:  Christopher A Taylor; Diane Braza; J Bradford Rice; Timothy Dillingham
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.159

View more
  9 in total

1.  Subclinical neuropathy in diabetic patients: a risk factor for bilateral lower limb neurological deficit following spinal anesthesia?

Authors:  Darshan S Angadi; Ajit Garde
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Adverse drug interactions: moving from perception to action.

Authors:  Ryan Mayhew; June M McKoy; Thanh Ha Luu; Isaac Lopez; Melissa Frick; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Nerve monitoring during proximal humeral fracture fixation: what have we learned?

Authors:  William J Warrender; Stephen Oppenheimer; Joseph A Abboud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Common Peroneal Nerve Injury and Recovery after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christopher N Carender; Nicholas A Bedard; Qiang An; Timothy S Brown
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-08-22

Review 5.  Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and harms.

Authors:  J B Thorlund; C B Juhl; E M Roos; L S Lohmander
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-06-16

Review 6.  Knee arthroscopy versus conservative management in patients with degenerative knee disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Romina Brignardello-Petersen; Gordon H Guyatt; Rachelle Buchbinder; Rudolf W Poolman; Stefan Schandelmaier; Yaping Chang; Behnam Sadeghirad; Nathan Evaniew; Per O Vandvik
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  An Epidemiologic Perspective on Scaphoid Fracture Treatment and Frequency of Nonunion Surgery in the USA.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Nikolas H Kazmers; Jack Baty; Kerry Bommarito; Daniel A Osei
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-06-04

8.  Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and harms.

Authors:  J B Thorlund; C B Juhl; E M Roos; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  The distance of the femoral neurovascular bundle from the hip joint: an intraoperative guide to reduce iatrogenic injury.

Authors:  Cyrus R Mehta; Alex Constantinidis; Moussa Farhat; Mayuran Suthersan; Edward Graham; Andrew Kanawati
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.