Literature DB >> 16951081

Mutator phenotype of Caenorhabditis elegans DNA damage checkpoint mutants.

Jasper Harris1, Mia Lowden, Iuval Clejan, Monika Tzoneva, James H Thomas, Jonathan Hodgkin, Shawn Ahmed.   

Abstract

DNA damage response proteins identify sites of DNA damage and signal to downstream effectors that orchestrate either apoptosis or arrest of the cell cycle and DNA repair. The C. elegans DNA damage response mutants mrt-2, hus-1, and clk-2(mn159) displayed 8- to 15-fold increases in the frequency of spontaneous mutation in their germlines. Many of these mutations were small- to medium-sized deletions, some of which had unusual sequences at their breakpoints such as purine-rich tracts or direct or inverted repeats. Although DNA-damage-induced apoptosis is abrogated in the mrt-2, hus-1, and clk-2 mutant backgrounds, lack of the apoptotic branch of the DNA damage response pathway in cep-1/p53, ced-3, and ced-4 mutants did not result in a Mutator phenotype. Thus, DNA damage checkpoint proteins suppress the frequency of mutation by ensuring that spontaneous DNA damage is accurately repaired in C. elegans germ cells. Although DNA damage response defects that predispose humans to cancer are known to result in large-scale chromosome aberrations, our results suggest that small- to medium-sized deletions may also play roles in the development of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16951081      PMCID: PMC1602097          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.058701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  93 in total

1.  Brca2 (XRCC11) deficiency results in radioresistant DNA synthesis and a higher frequency of spontaneous deletions.

Authors:  Maria Kraakman-van der Zwet; Wilhelmina J I Overkamp; Rebecca E E van Lange; Jeroen Essers; Annemarie van Duijn-Goedhart; Ingrid Wiggers; Srividya Swaminathan; Paul P W van Buul; Abdellatif Errami; Raoul T L Tan; Nicolaas G J Jaspers; Shyam K Sharan; Roland Kanaar; Malgorzata Z Zdzienicka
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K Myung; C Chen; R D Kolodner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Diverse DNA transposons in rotifers of the class Bdelloidea.

Authors:  Irina R Arkhipova; Matthew Meselson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Screening for germ-line rearrangements and regulatory mutations in BRCA1 led to the identification of four new deletions.

Authors:  N Puget; D Stoppa-Lyonnet; O M Sinilnikova; S Pagès; H T Lynch; G M Lenoir; S Mazoyer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites.

Authors:  Francene J Lemoine; Natasha P Degtyareva; Kirill Lobachev; Thomas D Petes
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Inactivation of mouse Hus1 results in genomic instability and impaired responses to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  R S Weiss; T Enoch; P Leder
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 7.  Cancer susceptibility and the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  Ashok R Venkitaraman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Gene interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans define DPY-31 as a candidate procollagen C-proteinase and SQT-3/ROL-4 as its predicted major target.

Authors:  Jacopo Novelli; Shawn Ahmed; Jonathan Hodgkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Recombination of Ty elements in yeast can be induced by a double-strand break.

Authors:  A Parket; O Inbar; M Kupiec
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Fission yeast rad17: a homologue of budding yeast RAD24 that shares regions of sequence similarity with DNA polymerase accessory proteins.

Authors:  D J Griffiths; N C Barbet; S McCready; A R Lehmann; A M Carr
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Cancer models in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Natalia V Kirienko; Kumaran Mani; David S Fay
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.780

2.  BRAP-2 promotes DNA damage induced germline apoptosis in C. elegans through the regulation of SKN-1 and AKT-1.

Authors:  Dayana R D'Amora; Queenie Hu; Monica Pizzardi; Terrance J Kubiseski
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 15.828

3.  Caenorhabditis elegans POT-2 telomere protein represses a mode of alternative lengthening of telomeres with normal telomere lengths.

Authors:  Chen Cheng; Ludmila Shtessel; Megan M Brady; Shawn Ahmed
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The Caenorhabditis elegans Rad17 homolog HPR-17 is required for telomere replication.

Authors:  Julie Boerckel; Dana Walker; Shawn Ahmed
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genome integrity is regulated by the Caenorhabditis elegans Rad51D homolog rfs-1.

Authors:  Judith L Yanowitz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Promotion of Homologous Recombination by SWS-1 in Complex with RAD-51 Paralogs in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  T Brooke McClendon; Meghan R Sullivan; Kara A Bernstein; Judith L Yanowitz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Caenorhabditis elegans RSD-2 and RSD-6 promote germ cell immortality by maintaining small interfering RNA populations.

Authors:  Aisa Sakaguchi; Peter Sarkies; Matt Simon; Anna-Lisa Doebley; Leonard D Goldstein; Ashley Hedges; Kohta Ikegami; Stacy M Alvares; Liwei Yang; Jeannine R LaRocque; Julie Hall; Eric A Miska; Shawn Ahmed
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Protection of the C. elegans germ cell genome depends on diverse DNA repair pathways during normal proliferation.

Authors:  Bettina Meier; Nadezda V Volkova; Ye Hong; Simone Bertolini; Víctor González-Huici; Tsvetana Petrova; Simon Boulton; Peter J Campbell; Moritz Gerstung; Anton Gartner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Functional dissection of Caenorhabditis elegans CLK-2/TEL2 cell cycle defects during embryogenesis and germline development.

Authors:  Sandra C Moser; Sophie von Elsner; Ingo Büssing; Arno Alpi; Ralf Schnabel; Anton Gartner
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  GCNA Interacts with Spartan and Topoisomerase II to Regulate Genome Stability.

Authors:  Gregoriy A Dokshin; Gregory M Davis; Ashley D Sawle; Matthew D Eldridge; Peter K Nicholls; Taylin E Gourley; Katherine A Romer; Luke W Molesworth; Hannah R Tatnell; Ahmet R Ozturk; Dirk G de Rooij; Gregory J Hannon; David C Page; Craig C Mello; Michelle A Carmell
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 12.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.