Literature DB >> 16950102

Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences.

Samuel Cotton1, Jennifer Small, Andrew Pomiankowski.   

Abstract

The last decade has witnessed considerable theoretical and empirical investigation of how male sexual ornaments evolve. This strong male-biased perspective has resulted in the relative neglect of variation in female mate preferences and its consequences for ornament evolution. As sexual selection is a co-evolutionary process between males and females, ignoring variation in females overlooks a key aspect of this process. Here, we review the empirical evidence that female mate preferences, like male ornaments, are condition dependent. We show accumulating support for the hypothesis that high quality females show the strongest mate preference. Nonetheless, this is still an infant field, and we highlight areas in need of more research, both theoretical and empirical. We also examine some of the wider implications of condition-dependent mating decisions and their effect on the strength of sexual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16950102     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  83 in total

1.  Complex sperm evolution.

Authors:  Matthew J G Gage
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sex and the public: Social eavesdropping, sperm competition risk and male mate choice.

Authors:  Martin Plath; David Bierbach
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-05

3.  Convenience polyandry or convenience polygyny? Costly sex under female control in a promiscuous primate.

Authors:  Elise Huchard; Cindy I Canale; Chloé Le Gros; Martine Perret; Pierre-Yves Henry; Peter M Kappeler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Are high-quality mates always attractive?: State-dependent mate preferences in birds and humans.

Authors:  Katharina Riebel; Marie-Jeanne Holveck; Simon Verhulst; Tim W Fawcett
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2010-05

Review 5.  Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.

Authors:  Luc F Bussière; John Hunt; Kai N Stölting; Michael D Jennions; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Katja Heubel
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Swingin' in the rain: condition dependence and sexual selection in a capricious world.

Authors:  Andrew Cockburn; Helen L Osmond; Michael C Double
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Field crickets change mating preferences using remembered social information.

Authors:  Nathan W Bailey; Marlene Zuk
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  The mitonuclear compatibility hypothesis of sexual selection.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hill; James D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Condition-dependent female preference for male genitalia length is based on male reproductive tactics.

Authors:  Armando Hernandez-Jimenez; Oscar Rios-Cardenas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.