Literature DB >> 29212729

Condition-dependent female preference for male genitalia length is based on male reproductive tactics.

Armando Hernandez-Jimenez1, Oscar Rios-Cardenas2.   

Abstract

There is extensive morphological variation of male genitalia across animals with internal fertilization, even among closely related species. Most studies attempting to explain this extraordinary diversity have focused on processes that occur post-copula (e.g. sperm competition, cryptic female choice). Only a few studies have focused on the pre-copula process of female preference. In addition, the extent to which this variation could be associated with the use of different reproductive tactics has yet to be explored. Here, we show that female preference for male genitalia length in two livebearing fishes depends on the type of reproductive tactic of the males being evaluated as well as the body condition of the female. In a species where all males coax females to acquire matings (courters), females preferred males with short genitalia. In a species with genetically influenced alternative reproductive tactics (courter males that only court and produce courter sons, sneaker males that use the coercive tactic of sneak chase and produce sneaker sons), female preference depended on an interaction between male tactic and female condition: females in good condition preferred courter males with short genitalia, and sneaker males with long genitalia. Our results suggest that female preference for male traits favourable to their sons may be an important factor contributing to the diversification of male genitalia. Despite the contrasting selection for genitalia length that our female preference tests suggest, we found no significant differences in genitalia length between coaxing (courters) and coercive (sneakers) males. Our study represents a starting point to more clearly understand the role of alternative reproductive tactics and variation in female mate preference in the evolution of male genitalia.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  alternative reproductive tactics; female preference; male genitalia; swordtail fish

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29212729      PMCID: PMC5740287          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  17 in total

1.  Intraspecific evidence from guppies for correlated patterns of male and female genital trait diversification.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Clelia Gasparini; Gregory I Holwell; Indar W Ramnarine; Trevor E Pitcher; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sexual conflict and indirect benefits.

Authors:  E Cameron; T Day; L Rowes
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Sexual selection and genital evolution.

Authors:  David J Hosken; Paula Stockley
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences.

Authors:  Samuel Cotton; Jennifer Small; Andrew Pomiankowski
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Females prefer to associate with males with longer intromittent organs in mosquitofish.

Authors:  Andrew T Kahn; Brian Mautz; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  An evaluation of video playback using Xiphophorus helleri.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favour alternative phenotypes?

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Male genital size reflects a tradeoff between attracting mates and avoiding predators in two live-bearing fish species.

Authors:  R Brian Langerhans; Craig A Layman; Thomas J DeWitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Analysing body condition: mass, volume or density?

Authors:  Jordi Moya-Laraño; Rogelio Macías-Ordóñez; Wolf U Blanckenhorn; Carmen Fernández-Montraveta
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Male genital morphology and its influence on female mating preferences and paternity success in guppies.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Andrea Pilastro; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.