Literature DB >> 16950033

A third-generation, posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis: early results after follow-up of 2 to 6 years.

Robin Fuchs1, Edward L Mills, Henry D Clarke, Giles R Scuderi, W Norman Scott, John N Insall.   

Abstract

Two hundred seventy-nine primary total knee arthroplasties were performed with a modular, cemented, third-generation, posterior-stabilized prosthesis. At mean follow-up of 48 months (range, 24-72 months), the outcomes of 238 knees (85%) were evaluated with the Knee Society's Knee and Functional Scoring Systems and Roentgenographic Scoring System. The mean preoperative Knee Society Knee Score was 48 points compared with 96 points at latest follow-up. There were no cases of patellar clunk, symptomatic patellar maltracking, or posterior dislocation. There was no radiographic evidence of loosening or osteolysis, and no revisions were performed or recommended for loosening, osteolysis, instability, or polyethylene wear. Three patients developed late infections. These early results support the ongoing use of this design; however, long-term studies will be required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16950033     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  Posterior-stabilized versus posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Frank R Kolisek; Michael S McGrath; David R Marker; Nenette Jessup; Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont; C Lowry Barnes
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2009

2.  The 5-year results of an oxidized zirconium femoral component for TKA.

Authors:  Massimo Innocenti; Roberto Civinini; Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Marco Villano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Midterm clinical and radiographic results of the medial pivot total knee system.

Authors:  Robert Schmidt; Steven Ogden; J David Blaha; Angelia Alexander; David A Fitch; C Lowry Barnes
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Long-term follow-up of a non-randomised prospective cohort of one hundred and ninety two total knee arthroplasties using the NexGen implant.

Authors:  Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Franceso Falez; Rocco D'Apolito; Katia Corona; Carlo Perisano; Michele Vasso
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  [Development, terminology, principles, and controversies in minimally invasive knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  S Hofmann; M Pietsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Aseptic tibial debonding as a cause of early failure in a modern total knee arthroplasty design.

Authors:  Diren Arsoy; Mark W Pagnano; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Significant differences in rates of aseptic loosening between two variations of a popular total knee arthroplasty design.

Authors:  Michael Brown; Rohan Ramasubbu; Mark Jenkinson; James Doonan; Mark Blyth; Bryn Jones
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 3.075

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.