Literature DB >> 18026928

[Development, terminology, principles, and controversies in minimally invasive knee arthroplasty].

S Hofmann1, M Pietsch.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty is a logical and further improvement of the good results achieved with minimally invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty. The terminology for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is confusing and comparison of different techniques is therefore difficult. A simple separation between less invasive and minimally invasive techniques will be presented. Besides the approach, minimally invasive surgical principles are very important. MIS in total knee arthroplasty is discussed very controversially at the moment. The preliminary results of these new techniques are very promising. Up to now there is much more feeling then knowing. Important questions (risk-benefit analysis, which technique for which patient and surgeon, education and cost-effectiveness) must be addressed by the proponents of this MIS technique. Step by step learning of these new techniques (evolution instead of revolution) in specific education centres is strongly recommended. Ultimately, patients and surgeons will have to decide whether these new techniques will only be a modern trend or represent the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18026928     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-007-1167-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  26 in total

1.  Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial.

Authors:  G S Roysam; M J Oakley
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  New techniques and concepts in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Richard S Laskin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Minimally invasive total joint arthroplasty: where are we going?

Authors:  Chitranjan S Ranawat; Amar S Ranawat
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  The midvastus approach to the knee.

Authors:  Gerard A Engh; Deborah J Ammeen
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jean-Noël A Argenson; Xavier Flecher
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: a 10-feature evolutionary approach.

Authors:  Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont; Mark A Kester
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.472

7.  Minimally invasive surgery vs conventional exposure using the Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a randomized radiostereometric study.

Authors:  Lars V Carlsson; Björn E J Albrektsson; Lars R Regnér
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of the learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period.

Authors:  Jason King; Daniel L Stamper; Douglas C Schaad; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A Repicci; R W Eberle
Journal:  J South Orthop Assoc       Date:  1999

10.  Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience.

Authors:  Alfred J Tria; Thomas M Coon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Postoperative complications in trauma surgery].

Authors:  C Josten; C Schmidt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.955

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.