| Literature DB >> 16945138 |
Kuo-Liong Chien1, Hsiu-Ching Hsu, Ta-Chen Su, Ming-Fong Chen, Yuan-Teh Lee.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic components controlling for echocardiographically determined left ventricular (LV) mass are still unclear in the Chinese population.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16945138 PMCID: PMC1579230 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-6-37
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Basic characteristics of participants in the study, specified by generations (n = 1,145)
| Probands (N = 368) | Siblings (N = 333) | Parents (N = 444) | ||||||||||
| Mean | SD | Skewness | Kurtosis | Mean | SD | Skewness | Kurtosis | Mean | SD | Skewness | Kurtosis | |
| Age (years) | 16.45 | 0.97 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 17.83 | 3.43 | 0.59 | 1.05 | 43.65 | 5.74 | 1.35 | 4.65 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 20.63 | 3.87 | 1.13 | 1.24 | 20.08 | 3.13 | 1.31 | 4.26 | 24.23 | 3.91 | 1.03 | 4.40 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 108.86 | 13.02 | 0.34 | -0.34 | 111.65 | 12.90 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 119.13 | 15.12 | 0.82 | 1.28 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 67.79 | 9.33 | -0.05 | -0.75 | 70.66 | 10.36 | 0.18 | 0.51 | 78.48 | 11.46 | 0.70 | 0.68 |
| LV mass (gm) | 117.02 | 39.99 | 1.00 | 1.06 | 111.10 | 38.26 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 150.08 | 48.65 | 0.62 | 0.21 |
| LV mass index (gm/m2.7) | 31.93 | 9.41 | 1.02 | 1.88 | 30.39 | 8.80 | 0.87 | 1.49 | 41.16 | 11.59 | 0.47 | -0.11 |
| Smoking | 1 (0.3%) | 35 (10.5%) | 159 (35.8%) | |||||||||
| Alcohol drinking | 1 (0.3%) | 25 (7.5%) | 173 (39.0%) | |||||||||
Abbreviated: BMI: body mass index, SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, LV: left ventricular
Figure 1Observed (histogram) and expected (linear) distributions of adjusted left ventricular mass in the study subjects. Two thin lines were plotted from 2-component Normal distributions with means as (-0.168, 1.029) and variance as (0.661, 1.837), respectively. The thick line was the summation of two thin lines.
Familial correlation coefficients and significant levels for testing the null hypothesis among the various familial pairs in the studied family members.
| Pairs | Numbers | Coefficients | |
| Spouse | 162 | 0.254 | 0.001 |
| Parent-offspring | 889 | 0.294 | 0.000 |
| Sibling | 427 | 0.169 | 0.000 |
| Grandparent-child | 287 | 0.179 | 0.002 |
| Mother-daughter | 220 | 0.254 | 0.000 |
| Mother-son | 252 | 0.379 | 0.000 |
| Father-daughter | 205 | 0.084 | 0.231 |
| Father-son | 212 | 0.356 | 0.000 |
| Sister-sister | 131 | 0.136 | 0.121 |
| Sister-brother | 209 | 0.162 | 0.019 |
| Brother-brother | 87 | 0.208 | 0.053 |
Parameter estimates from segregation analysis of residual LV mass values: Class D regressive models, conditional on proband phenotypes
| Model | Pure familial correlation, i.e. polygenic | Pure major gene (Mendel) | Mendel + familial correlation (mixed codominant) | A Dominant, μAB = μAA | A Recessive, i.e. B Dominant, μAB = μBB | Unrestricted, general | ||||||
| Parameter | S.E. | Parameter | S.E. | Parameter | S.E. | Parameter | S.E. | Parameter | S.E. | Parameter | S.E. | |
| qA | [1] | 0.098 | 0.028 | 0.093 | 0.030 | 0.040 | 0.020 | 0.000 | 0.142 | 0.109 | 0.024 | |
| τAA | - | [1] | [1] | [1] | [1] | 1.000 | 0.000 | |||||
| τAB | - | [0.5] | [0.5] | [1] | [1] | 0.249 | 0.100 | |||||
| τBB | - | [0] | [0] | [0] | [0] | 0.034 | 0.030 | |||||
| μAA | 36.0 | 0.5 | 64.4 | 4.3 | 65.1 | 4.5 | 51.4 | 2.8 | 40.9 | 8.2 | 62.7 | 3.4 |
| μAB | = μAA | 45.6 | 1.8 | 45.7 | 1.9 | 51.4 | 2.8 | 36.0 | 0.5 | 46.1 | 1.4 | |
| μBB | = μAA | 33.7 | 0.5 | 33.9 | 0.6 | 34.9 | 0.6 | 36.0 | 0.5 | 33.5 | 0.6 | |
| σ2 | 80.6 | 4.6 | 52.4 | 4.2 | 53.5 | 4.7 | 61.8 | 5.5 | 80.6 | 4.6 | 47.1 | 4.9 |
| ρMF | 0.199 | 0.072 | 0.327 | 0.093 | 0.315 | 0.091 | 0.246 | 0.079 | 0.199 | 0.072 | 0.334 | 0.098 |
| ρMO | 0.196 | 0.050 | [0] | 0.058 | 0.070 | 0.130 | 0.067 | 0.196 | 0.050 | 0.076 | 0.079 | |
| ρFO | 0.093 | 0.059 | [0] | -0.070 | 0.069 | -0.025 | 0.064 | 0.093 | 0.059 | -0.051 | 0.076 | |
| ρSS | 0.118 | 0.055 | [0] | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.037 | 0.069 | 0.118 | 0.055 | 0.017 | 0.065 | |
| # of | 6 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 12 | ||||||
| parameters | ||||||||||||
| -2ln(L) | 4721.80 | 4684.40 | 4682.38 | 4688.22 | 4721.80 | 4677.90 | ||||||
| AIC | 4733.8 | 4696.4 | 4700.38 | 4704.22 | 4737.8 | 4701.9 | ||||||
| χ2 | 43.9 | 6.5 | 4.48 | 10.32 | 43.9 | |||||||
| 0.000 | 0.370 | 0.214 | 0.035 | 0.000 | ||||||||
Abbreviation: qA, allele frequency; τAA, τAB, τBB, transmission probability; μAA, μAB, μBB, genotype means; σ2, variance; ρMF, ρMO, ρFO, ρSS, correlation coefficients among spouse, mother-offspring, father-ffspring and sibling pairs; #, number of parameters; ln(L), logarithm of likelihood; AIC, Akaike information criteria; P, p-value by compared with the unrestricted general model.
Summary of heritability estimates of left ventricular mass trait
| Post et al. 1997 15 | Relative pairs | Caucasians, Framingham families, no systemic diseases | 2624 subjects | Age, height, weight, systolic blood pressure | 0.24–0.32 | Limit in subjects without systemic diseases nor medication history |
| Garner et al. 2000 13 | Nuclear families | White, European families | 149/624 | weight | 0.28 | Children population |
| Kotchen et al. 2000 19 | Sibling | African American, hypertensive, hyperlipidemia | 68 sibpairs | Age, gender | 0.65–0.72 | FCOR and ASSOC in SAGE program to perform the analysis |
| Arnett et al. 2001 16 | Sibling | African Americans & white hypertensive | 1664 siblings | Age, gender, systolic blood pressure, obesity | Sibling correlations 0.29–0.44 in African American, 0.04–0.12 in white | High sibling correlation in African Americans |
| Palatini et al. 2001 23 | Nuclear families | Tecumseh Offspring Study | 251 offspring and 290 parents | Age, gender, body height systolic blood pressure, insulin, urinary sodium excretion, | No estimate of h2, parental LV mass explained 7.6% of total variance of offspring LV mass | Multiple linear regression models Young offspring (mean 17 years old) |
| Mayosi et al. 2002 17 | Extended families | British Caucasians, hypertensive probands from hospital or clinics | 229/955 | Age, systolic blood pressure, weight, height, WHR, diabetes | 0.23–0.29 | Ascertainment correction: yes |
| Swan et al. 2003 18 | Twins | Caucasians, Population-based | 55 pairs MZ vs. 55 pairs DZ | Age, gender, blood pressure, weight | 0.53–0.69 | |
| Bella et al. 2004 12 | Relative pairs, mostly sibpairs | American Indian families, different geographic location | 455/1373, 1305 relative pairs, 1077 sibpairs | Age, gender, centers, weight, height, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, medication, diabetes | 0.17(multiple adjusted) -0.27 (first three variates adjusted) | No significant heritability in Arizona Indians |
| Juo et al. 2005 20 | Extended families | Caribbean Hispanics | 84/623 | Age, gender, weight | 0.51 | Adding systolic blood pressure, diabetes, medication did not affect the estimate |
| This report | Nuclear families | Ethnic Chinese, young probands, community-based | 368/1145 | Age, gender, body mass index, blood pressure | 0.15 (multiple adjusted) -0.27 (first 3 variates adjusted) |