Literature DB >> 2297829

Relation of left ventricular hemodynamic load and contractile performance to left ventricular mass in hypertension.

A Ganau1, R B Devereux, T G Pickering, M J Roman, P L Schnall, S Santucci, M C Spitzer, J H Laragh.   

Abstract

The weak relation of systolic blood pressure to left ventricular mass in hypertensive patients is often interpreted as evidence of nonhemodynamic stimuli to muscle growth. To test the hypothesis that left ventricular chamber size, reflecting hemodynamic volume load and myocardial contractility, influences the development of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertension, we studied actual and theoretic relations of left ventricular mass to left ventricular diastolic chamber volume, pressure and volume load, and an index of contractility. Data were obtained from independently measured M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiograms in 50 normal subjects and 50 untreated patients with essential hypertension. Two indices of overall left ventricular load were assessed: total load (systolic blood pressure x left ventricular endocardial surface area) and peak meridional force (systolic blood pressure x left ventricular cross sectional area). A theoretically optimal left ventricular mass, allowing each subject to achieve mean normal peak stress, was calculated as a function of systolic blood pressure and M-mode left ventricular end-diastolic diameter. Left ventricular mass measured by M-mode echo correlated better with two-dimensional echocardiogram derived left ventricular end-diastolic volume (r = 0.56, p less than 0.001) than with systolic blood pressure (r = 0.45, p less than 0.001) and best with total load or peak meridional force (r = 0.68 and 0.70, p less than 0.001). In multivariate analysis both end-diastolic volume and blood pressure were independent predictors of systolic mass (p less than 0.001) and explained most of its variability (R = 0.75, p less than 0.001). Theoretically optimal left ventricular mass was more closely related to end-diastolic volume (r = 0.72, p less than 0.001) than to systolic blood pressure (r = 0.46, p less than 0.001); thus, the relatively weak correlation between blood pressure and optimal mass reflected the influence of left ventricular cavity size, rather than a lack of proportionality between load and hypertrophy. Actual and theoretically optimal left ventricular mass were closely related (r = 0.76, p less than 0.001), indicating that left ventricular hypertrophy in most cases paralleled hemodynamic load. Left ventricular mass was positively related to stroke index and inversely to contractility (as estimated by the end-systolic stress/volume index ratio), the main determinants of left ventricular chamber volume. In multivariate analysis, systolic blood pressure, stroke index, and the end-systolic stress/volume index ratio were each independently related to left ventricular mass index (all p less than 0.001, multiple R = 0.81) and accounted for 66% of its overall variability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2297829     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.81.1.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  21 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac and vascular pathophysiology in hypertension.

Authors:  Jamil Mayet; Alun Hughes
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Influence of Left Ventricular Stroke Volume on Incident Heart Failure in a Population With Preserved Ejection Fraction (from the Strong Heart Study).

Authors:  Marina De Marco; Eva Gerdts; Costantino Mancusi; Mary J Roman; Mai Tone Lønnebakken; Elisa T Lee; Barbara V Howard; Richard B Devereux; Giovanni de Simone
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 3.  Effect of interaction between left ventricular dysfunction and endothelial function in hypertension.

Authors:  Angela Sciacqua; Francesco Borrello; Marco Vatrano; Rosa Daniela Grembiale; Francesco Perticone
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  Genetic contributions to left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  D K Arnett
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Widened QRS-T Angle May Be a Measure of Poor Ventricular Stretch During Exercise Among On-duty Firefighters.

Authors:  Dillon J Dzikowicz; Mary G Carey
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 6.  Genes for left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Donna K Arnett; Lisa de las Fuentes; Ulrich Broeckel
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Cardiac output and associated left ventricular hypertrophy in pediatric chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Donald J Weaver; Thomas R Kimball; Phillip R Koury; Mark M Mitsnefes
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Cardiac abnormalities in young women with anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  G de Simone; L Scalfi; M Galderisi; A Celentano; G Di Biase; P Tammaro; M Garofalo; G F Mureddu; O de Divitiis; F Contaldo
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-03

9.  Prognostic implications of relations of left ventricular systolic dysfunction with body composition and myocardial energy expenditure: the Strong Heart Study.

Authors:  Vittorio Palmieri; Mary J Roman; Jonathan N Bella; Jennifer E Liu; Lyle G Best; Elisa T Lee; Barbara V Howard; Richard B Devereux
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 10.  Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors on left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  C Morisco; L Argenziano; N Tozzi; A F Mele; B Ricciardelli; G Condorelli; B Trimarco
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.