Literature DB >> 16944122

Functional MR study of a motor task and the tower of London task at 1.0 T.

A Boghi1, O Rampado, M Bergui, F Avidano, C Manzone, M Coriasco, P Mortara, L Orsi, R Ropolo, G B Bradac.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for clinical applications and basic neuroscience is constantly increasing. The discussion about minimum performance requirement for a correct implementation of fMRI is still open, and one of the critical points is the magnetic field strength. We tested the feasibility of fMRI at 1.0 T during motor and cognitive tasks.
METHODS: Fourteen healthy subjects were scanned during a motor task and 12 while performing the Tower of London task. In the activated areas, the percentage signal change due to BOLD (blood oxygenation level dependent) contrast was analysed. To check basic image quality of the acquisition system we measured quality indices in a temporal series of images of a phantom.
RESULTS: Motor and cognitive brain activations matched previous results obtained at higher field strengths. The mean percentage change over subjects in the motor task was in the range 1.3-2.6% for the primary motor area and 0.8-6.7% for the cerebellum. In the cognitive task, the mean percentage change over subjects was 0.7-1.2% for a frontal area and 0.6-2.8% for a parietal area. The percentage noise of the phantom temporal series was less than 0.4%. Percentage changes and signal to noise ratio, although lower than that obtained with high-field systems, allowed activation maps to be obtained in all subjects.
CONCLUSION: Our results replicate previous fMRI results demonstrating reproducible motor-related brain activations and extend the field to a complex cognitive task, thus providing evidence of the safety for routine clinical use of 1-T equipment.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16944122     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-006-0119-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  28 in total

1.  Mapping the network for planning: a correlational PET activation study with the Tower of London task.

Authors:  A Dagher; A M Owen; H Boecker; D J Brooks
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Clinical applications of functional MRI at 1.0 T: motor and language studies in healthy subjects and patients.

Authors:  K Papke; T Hellmann; B Renger; C Morgenroth; S Knecht; G Schuierer; P Reimer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; E C Wong; R S Hinks; R S Tikofsky; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Spiral K-space MR imaging of cortical activation.

Authors:  D C Noll; J D Cohen; C H Meyer; W Schneider
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Neural systems engaged by planning: a PET study of the Tower of London task.

Authors:  S C Baker; R D Rogers; A M Owen; C D Frith; R J Dolan; R S Frackowiak; T W Robbins
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Activation of the sensorimotor cortex at 1.0 T: comparison of echo-planar and gradient-echo imaging.

Authors:  B F van der Kallen; L J van Erning; M W van Zuijlen; H Merx; H O Thijssen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Simple measurement of scanner stability for functional NMR imaging of activation in the brain.

Authors:  R M Weisskoff
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of primary visual processing using a 1.0 Tesla scanner.

Authors:  A Lundervold; L Ersland; K I Gjesdal; A I Smievoll; T Tillung; H Sundberg; K Hugdahl
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.292

10.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Ogawa; D W Tank; R Menon; J M Ellermann; S G Kim; H Merkle; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Functional MR imaging on an open 1T MR imaging system: exploiting the advantages of an open MR imaging system for functional MR imaging.

Authors:  E van de Giessen; P F C Groot; J Booij; W van den Brink; D J Veltman; A J Nederveen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  FMRI based on transition-band balanced SSFP in comparison with EPI on a high-performance 0.55 T scanner.

Authors:  Yicun Wang; Peter van Gelderen; Jacco A de Zwart; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Jeff H Duyn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.737

3.  Task-dependent recruitment of intrinsic brain networks reflects normative variance in cognition.

Authors:  Jennifer L Gess; Jennifer S Fausett; Tonisha E Kearney-Ramos; Clinton D Kilts; George Andrew James
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Altered Functional Connectivity and Sensory Processing in Blepharospasm and Hemifacial Spasm: Coexistence and Difference.

Authors:  Ting-Chun Fang; Chun-Ming Chen; Ming-Hong Chang; Chen-Hao Wu; Yi-Jen Guo
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.