| Literature DB >> 34975723 |
Ting-Chun Fang1, Chun-Ming Chen2, Ming-Hong Chang1,3, Chen-Hao Wu4, Yi-Jen Guo1.
Abstract
Background: Blepharospasm (BSP) and hemifacial spasm (HFS) are both facial hyperkinesia however BSP is thought to be caused by maladaptation in multiple brain regions in contrast to the peripherally induced cause in HFS. Plausible coexisting pathophysiologies between these two distinct diseases have been proposed.Entities:
Keywords: blepharospasm; functional MRI; hemifacial spasm; quantitative thermal test; resting state functional connectivity
Year: 2021 PMID: 34975723 PMCID: PMC8715087 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.759869
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Clinical characteristics of the study subjects.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age (years old) | 63.0 ± 9.5 | 60.5 ± 6.7 | 67.8 ± 6.6 | 61.2 ± 13.6 | 0.080 |
| Gender (Male) % | 14 (36.8) | 4 (26.6) | 4 (33.3) | 6 (54.5) | 0.331 |
| MMSE | 28.0 ± 2.0 | 28.8 ± 1.01 | 26.7 ± 2.8 | 28.4 ± 1.2 | 0.081 |
| BDI-II | 6.3 ± 5.8 | 5.4 ± 4.2 | 5.8 ± 5.0 | 8.0 ± 8.1 | 0.843 |
| BAI | 6.4 ± 6.0 | 6.1 ± 5.3 | 4.3 ± 4.8 | 9.0 ± 7.6 | 0.280 |
| QTT warm (°C) | |||||
| Upper extremities | 34.4 ± 2.2 | 34.0 ± 0.43 | 35.1 ± 3.9 | 34.4 ± 0.7 | 0.447 |
| Lower extremities | 41.1 ± 3.4 | 39.4 ± 2.8 | 42.1 ± 3.4 | 42.3 ± 3.4 | 0.051 |
| QTT cold (°C) | |||||
| Upper extremities | 29.8 ± 1.5 | 30.1 ± 0.5 | 29.5 ± 2.6 | 29.8 ± 0.5 | 0.306 |
| Lower extremities | 28.4 ± 2.0 | 29.1 ± 1.0 | 27.5 ± 2.8 | 28.3 ± 1.9 | 0.044 |
| Disease duration (years) | 8.3 ± 5.3 | 8.5 ± 3.6 | 0.929 | ||
| Duration of BTX treatment (years) | 3.8 ± 0.9 | 3.8 ± 1.2 | 0.833 | ||
| Disease severity | |||||
| JRS-Severity | 2.6 ± 0.4 | ||||
| JRS-Frequency | 2.8 ± 0.5 | ||||
| Five-point RS | 2.0 ± 0.0 | ||||
| Disease disability | |||||
| BSDI | 6.0 ± 4.0 | ||||
| HFS-7 | 4.0 ± 3.7 | ||||
Categorical data were analyzed using the chi-square test and are presented as number (%). Continuous data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). P, p-value; BSP, blepharospasm; HFS, hemifacial spasm; MMSE, Mini Mental Status Examination; BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory-II; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory; QTT, quantitative thermal test; BTX, botulinum toxin; JRS, Jankovic Rating Scale; Five-point RS, 5-point rating scale; BSDI, Blepharospasm Disability Index.
Increased functional connectivity in different groups for seed ROI with the anterior cerebellar network.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP vs. HC | Postcentral and precentral gyrus R | Primary somatosensory and motor cortex (BA 1–3, 4) | +56 −10 +32 | 139 | 0.0000 |
| Postcentral gyrus R | Primary somatosensory cortex (BA 1–3) | +16 −34 +64 | 119 | 0.0001 | |
| Cuneal cortex L | Associative visual cortex (BA 19) | −8 −80 +30 | 119 | 0.0000 | |
| HFS vs. HC | Inferior and superior lateral occipital cortex L | Secondary and associative visual cortex (BA 18, 19) | −40 −78 +04 | 165 | 0.0000 |
| Effect of QTT scores (lower extremities) | Lingual gyrus, Occipital fusiform gyrus, Cerebellum 4 and 5, Cerebellum 6 L | Secondary and associative visual cortex (BA 18, 19) | −18 −62 −10 | 387 | 0.0000 |
Negative coordinates are left (x), posterior (y), inferior (z). P, p-value; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; ROI, region of interest; BSP, blepharospasm; HC, healthy control; HFS, hemifacial spasm; QTT, quantitative thermal test; R, Right; L, Left; BA, Brodmann area.
Figure 1Increased functional connectivity with the anterior cerebellum as the seed ROI (p < 0.05, p-FDR-corrected) over the left occipital lobe (BA19), in the BSP group vs. HC group (A), HFS group vs. HC group (B), and the effect of cold detection threshold of the QTT over the lower extremities in all subjects (C). Illustrations of BA19 in corresponding coordinates (x, y, z), left (−8, −80, +30), middle (−40, −78, +04), right (−18, −62, −10) (D). L, left; ROI, region of interest; BA, Broadmann area; BSP, blepharospasm; HC, healthy control; HFS, hemifacial spasm; QTT, quantitative thermal test.
Figure 2Increased functional connectivity with the anterior cerebellum as the seed ROI (p < 0.05, p-FDR-corrected) in the BSP group vs. HC group, over the right postcentral and precentral gyrus (A), and over the right postcentral gyrus (B). L, left; ROI, region of interest; BSP, blepharospasm; HC, healthy control.
Decreased functional connectivity in different groups for seed ROI with the anterior cerebellar network.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HFS vs. HC | Frontal orbital cortex, amygdala, Parahippocampal gyrus R | Orbitofrontal and subgenual area (BA 11, 25), dorsal entorhinal cortex (BA 34) | +14 +02 −22 | 340 | 0.0000 |
Negative coordinates are left (x), posterior (y), inferior (z). P, p value; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; ROI, region of interest; HC, healthy control; HFS, hemifacial spasm; R, Right; BA, Brodmann area.
Figure 3Decreased functional connectivity with the anterior cerebellum as the seed ROI (p < 0.05, p-FDR-corrected) in the HFS group vs. HC group. L, left; ROI, region of interest; HFS, hemifacial spasm; HC, healthy control.