Literature DB >> 16944119

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: quantitative MR assessment of nidal response at 1 year and angiographic factors predicting early obliteration.

S Nagaraja1, K J Lee, S C Coley, D Capener, L Walton, A A Kemeny, I D Wilkinson, P D Griffiths.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the role of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the early follow-up of patients after stereotactic radiosurgery (STRS) for cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and determined the influence of individual morphological factors of AVMs in early response to treatment.
METHODS: A group of 40 patients (41 AVMs) consented to a dedicated 1.5-T MR protocol 12 months after receiving STRS for a brain AVM. In addition to standard spin echo sequences, 3-D contrast-enhanced sliding interleaved Ky MRA (CE-SLINKY) and dynamic time-resolved subtraction angiography (MR-DSA) were performed. Nidal volumes were calculated using CE-SLINKY data in patients with a persisting arteriovenous shunt. Planning angiographic data was investigated in all 40 patients. The following AVM factors were used in the statistical analysis to determine their role in nidus obliteration: (1) maximum linear dimension, (2) nidal volume, (3) AVM location (4) nidal morphology, (5) venous drainage, (6) "high-flow angiographic change", (7) prior embolization, and (8) dose reduction.
RESULTS: Complete nidal obliteration was found in 9 patients, 26 showed greater than 50% nidal reduction and 6 had less than 50%. Two AVM factors, venous drainage and AVM location, were found to significantly correlate with rate of obliteration.
CONCLUSION: We successfully demonstrated the use of MRA to quantitatively assess the response of AVMs to STRS. Two AVM factors, venous drainage and AVM location were found to correlate with rate of obliteration prior to the application of the Bonferroni correction, but if this more rigorous statistical test was applied then none of the factors was found to be significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16944119     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-006-0131-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  33 in total

1.  Radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: is an early angiogram needed?

Authors:  C Oppenheim; J F Meder; D Trystram; F Nataf; S Godon-Hardy; J Blustajn; L Mérienne; M Schlienger; D Frédy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Long-term results of radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformation: neurodiagnostic imaging and histological studies of angiographically confirmed nidus obliteration.

Authors:  M Yamamoto; M Jimbo; M Kobayashi; C Toyoda; M Ide; N Tanaka; C Lindquist; L Steiner
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1992-03

3.  The relevance of anatomic and hemodynamic factors to a classification of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  A Pasqualin; G Barone; F Cioffi; L Rosta; R Scienza; R Da Pian
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: the value of radiologic parameters in predicting response to radiosurgery.

Authors:  J F Meder; C Oppenheim; J Blustajn; F Nataf; L Merienne; D Lefkoupolos; A Laurent; J J Merland; M Schlienger; D Fredy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Cerebral angiographic risk in mild cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  G J Hankey; C P Warlow; R J Sellar
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Linear accelerator radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: an update.

Authors:  F Colombo; F Pozza; G Chierego; L Casentini; G De Luca; P Francescon
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  A proposed angiographic classification of intracranial arteriovenous fistulae and malformations.

Authors:  E Houdart; Y P Gobin; A Casasco; A Aymard; D Herbreteau; J J Merland
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  Management of patients with brain arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Michael Söderman; Tommy Andersson; Bengt Karlsson; M Christopher Wallace; Göran Edner
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Treatment of arteriovenous malformations with stereotactic radiosurgery employing both magnetic resonance angiography and standard angiography as a database.

Authors:  D Petereit; M Mehta; P Turski; A Levin; C Strother; C Mistretta; R Mackie; M Gehring; S Kubsad; T Kinsella
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-01-15       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Results of stereotactic radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations: an analysis of 52 cases.

Authors:  A A Kemeny; P S Dias; D M Forster
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  3 in total

1.  Changes in AVM angio-architecture and hemodynamics after stereotactic radiosurgery assessed by dynamic MRA and phase contrast flow assessments: a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Lydia Schuster; E Schenk; F Giesel; T Hauser; L Gerigk; A Zabel-Du-Bois; Marco Essig
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Prospective comparison of late 3T MRI with conventional angiography in evaluating the patency of cerebral arteriovenous malformations treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Nader Khandanpour; Paul Griffiths; Daniel Warren; Nigel Hoggard
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Detection of residual brain arteriovenous malformations after radiosurgery: diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional time of flight MR angiography at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Kyoung Eun Lee; Choong Gon Choi; Jin Woo Choi; Byung Se Choi; Deok Hee Lee; Sang Joon Kim; Do Hoon Kwon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 3.500

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.