Literature DB >> 23440432

Prospective comparison of late 3T MRI with conventional angiography in evaluating the patency of cerebral arteriovenous malformations treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Nader Khandanpour1, Paul Griffiths, Daniel Warren, Nigel Hoggard.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Risk of further haemorrhage in patients suffering from arteriovenous malformation (AVM) would be eliminated only if complete obliteration of the AVM is obtained. Therefore, these patients frequently need long-term follow-up. Conventional catheter angiography (CCA) with a risk of 0.5 %.to 1.6 % of significant neurological complications has traditionally been used for this purpose. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3T may be a safer alternative. The aim of this study was to evaluate if MRI at 3T can accurately evaluate closure of AVM in 2 years after stereotactic radiosurgery.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients with both MRI at 3T and a CCA study were examined. The residual AVMs were evaluated by MRI at 3T against CCA in a prospective study.
RESULTS: The time interval between radiosurgery and neuroimaging was on average of 25 months (range, 15-30 months) for MRI study and 33 months (range, 25-46 months) for CCA study. Ten patients showed closure of the AVM on MRI, all of which were confirmed on CCA.
CONCLUSION: There was a complete agreement between late MRI at 3T scan and CCA in evaluation of AVM patency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23440432     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-013-1153-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  21 in total

1.  MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of cranial arteriovenous malformations and fistulas.

Authors:  S Aoki; T Yoshikawa; M Hori; A Nanbu; H Kumagai; Y Nishiyama; H Nukui; T Araki
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Repeated radiosurgery for incompletely obliterated arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  S Maesawa; J C Flickinger; D Kondziolka; L D Lunsford
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging: an accurate method to evaluate arteriovenous malformations after stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  B E Pollock; D Kondziolka; J C Flickinger; A K Patel; D J Bissonette; L D Lunsford
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Direct comparison of sensitivity encoding (SENSE) accelerated and conventional 3D contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of renal arteries: effect of increasing spatial resolution.

Authors:  R Muthupillai; E Douglas; S Huber; B Lambert; M Pereyra; G J Wilson; S D Flamm
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Stereotactic radiation treatment planning and follow-up studies involving fused multimodality imaging.

Authors:  Klaus D Hamm; Gunnar Surber; Michael Schmücking; Reinhard E Wurm; Rene Aschenbach; Gabriele Kleinert; A Niesen; Richard P Baum
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Ian G Fleetwood; Gary K Steinberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-09       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Clinical outcome of radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  L Steiner; C Lindquist; J R Adler; J C Torner; W Alves; M Steiner
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Economic burden of intracranial vascular malformations in adults: prospective population-based study.

Authors:  Clare E Miller; Zahidul Quayyum; Paul McNamee; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T time-of-flight MR angiography.

Authors:  Gordon F Gibbs; John Huston; Matt A Bernstein; Stephen J Riederer; Robert D Brown
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  4D radial acquisition contrast-enhanced MR angiography and intracranial arteriovenous malformations: quickly approaching digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Christopher S Eddleman; Hyun J Jeong; Michael C Hurley; Sven Zuehlsdorff; Guilherme Dabus; Christopher G Getch; H Hunt Batjer; Bernard R Bendok; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  1 in total

1.  Value of 4D MR angiography at 3T compared with DSA for the follow-up of treated brain arteriovenous malformation.

Authors:  S Soize; F Bouquigny; K Kadziolka; C Portefaix; L Pierot
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.825

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.