Literature DB >> 16943261

UK reference data for the Hologic QDR Discovery dual-energy x ray absorptiometry scanner in healthy children and young adults aged 6-17 years.

Kate A Ward1, Rebecca L Ashby, Steven A Roberts, Judith E Adams, M Zulf Mughal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use and correct interpretation of bone densitometry measurements in paediatric patients relies on the availability of appropriate reference data. Ideally, such data should be matched for sex, chronological age, height, weight, pubertal development and ethnicity. AIM: To provide UK-specific reference data for the Hologic QDR Discovery dual-energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners.
METHODS: Healthy, Caucasian children aged 5-18 years were recruited from local schools, colleges, general practitioner surgeries and staff from the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Suitable participants had DXA measurements taken of the lumbar spine, hip and total body. Sex-specific reference centile curves for bone mineral apparent density (BMAD; spine and femoral neck) are provided, using the approach suggested by Mølgaard et al. to interpret the scans. LMS (lambda, mu, varsigma) tables for calculation of individual standard deviation scores (SDSs) were produced; a weblink is provided to these tables to allow calculation of an individual child's SDSs.
RESULTS: The total study population consisted of 442 participants (239 male). The total numbers of scans available for analysis were 431 of the lumbar spine, 426 of the total body and 393 of the proximal femur. Data are provided for clinical interpretation of the spine and femoral neck scans based on BMAD (g/cm3), which reduces the size dependence of DXA areal bone mineral density (g/cm2). The spine and total-body data are also presented for interpretation of results using the approach suggested by Mølgaard et al.
CONCLUSIONS: This article provides the first sex-specific and ethnicity-specific reference databases for UK, which should allow the clinician to assess bone mineral density in paediatric patients, measured by the Hologic QDR Discovery DXA scanner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16943261      PMCID: PMC2083173          DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.097642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  46 in total

1.  Bone mineral acquisition in healthy Asian, Hispanic, black, and Caucasian youth: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  L K Bachrach; T Hastie; M C Wang; B Narasimhan; R Marcus
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Bone density in asthmatic children treated with inhaled corticosteroids.

Authors:  S M Reilly; G Hambleton; J E Adams; M Z Mughal
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Worm plot: a simple diagnostic device for modelling growth reference curves.

Authors:  S van Buuren; M Fredriks
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  More broken bones: a 4-year double cohort study of young girls with and without distal forearm fractures.

Authors:  A Goulding; I E Jones; R W Taylor; P J Manning; S M Williams
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Evaluation of low density spine software for the assessment of bone mineral density in children.

Authors:  M B Leonard; H I Feldman; B S Zemel; J A Berlin; E M Barden; V A Stallings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Osteoporosis and osteopenia in adults and adolescents with cystic fibrosis: prevalence and associated factors.

Authors:  S P Conway; A M Morton; B Oldroyd; J G Truscott; H White; A H Smith; I Haigh
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Bone densities and bone size at the distal radius in healthy children and adolescents: a study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  C M Neu; F Manz; F Rauch; A Merkel; E Schoenau
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Bone assessment in children: comparison of fan-beam DXA analysis.

Authors:  R J Shypailo; K J Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 9.  Secular trends in growth.

Authors:  T J Cole
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.297

10.  Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine in a clinical paediatric setting: does the method of size-adjustment matter?

Authors:  M S Fewtrell; I Gordon; L Biassoni; T J Cole
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  31 in total

1.  DXA surrogates for visceral fat are inversely associated with bone density measures in adolescent athletes with menstrual dysfunction.

Authors:  Kathryn E Ackerman; Brittany Davis; Leah Jacoby; Madhusmita Misra
Journal:  J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.634

2.  The muscle-bone unit of peripheral and central skeletal sites in children and young adults.

Authors:  R L Ashby; J E Adams; S A Roberts; M Z Mughal; K A Ward
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The correlation between calcaneus stiffness index calculated by QUS and total body BMD assessed by DXA in Chinese children and adolescents.

Authors:  Yi Xu; Bin Guo; Jian Gong; Hao Xu; Zhiquan Bai
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 4.  The Utility of DXA Assessment at the Forearm, Proximal Femur, and Lateral Distal Femur, and Vertebral Fracture Assessment in the Pediatric Population: 2019 ISCD Official Position.

Authors:  David R Weber; Alison Boyce; Catherine Gordon; Wolfgang Högler; Heidi H Kecskemethy; Madhusmita Misra; Diana Swolin-Eide; Peter Tebben; Leanne M Ward; Halley Wasserman; Christopher Shuhart; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Can bisphosphonate treatment be stopped in a growing child with skeletal fragility?

Authors:  K A Ward; J E Adams; T J Freemont; M Z Mughal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Reference values of bone stiffness index and C-terminal telopeptide in healthy European children.

Authors:  D Herrmann; T Intemann; F Lauria; S Mårild; D Molnár; L A Moreno; I Sioen; M Tornaritis; T Veidebaum; I Pigeot; W Ahrens
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  Amalgamated Reference Data for Size-Adjusted Bone Densitometry Measurements in 3598 Children and Young Adults-the ALPHABET Study.

Authors:  Nicola J Crabtree; Nicholas J Shaw; Nicholas J Bishop; Judith E Adams; M Zulf Mughal; Paul Arundel; Mary S Fewtrell; S Faisal Ahmed; Laura A Treadgold; Wolfgang Högler; Natalie A Bebbington; Kate A Ward
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Apparent Density in Children: Results From the Bone Mineral Density in Childhood Study.

Authors:  Joseph M Kindler; Joan M Lappe; Vicente Gilsanz; Sharon Oberfield; John A Shepherd; Andrea Kelly; Karen K Winer; Heidi J Kalkwarf; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  High bone mineral apparent density in children with X-linked hypophosphatemia.

Authors:  S S Beck-Nielsen; K Brixen; J Gram; C Mølgaard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Decreased bone mineral density in adults born with very low birth weight: a cohort study.

Authors:  Petteri Hovi; Sture Andersson; Anna-Liisa Järvenpää; Johan G Eriksson; Sonja Strang-Karlsson; Eero Kajantie; Outi Mäkitie
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.