Literature DB >> 16943250

Smoke without fire: most reported cases of intron gain in nematodes instead reflect intron losses.

Scott William Roy1, David Penny.   

Abstract

Identification of recently gained spliceosomal introns would provide crucial evidence in the continuing debate concerning the age and evolutionary significance of introns. A previously published genomic analysis reported to have identified 122 introns that had been gained since the divergence of the nematodes Caenorhabidits elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae approximately 100 MYA. However, using newly available genomic sequence from additional Caenorhabditis species, we show that 74% (60/81) of the reported gains in C. elegans are present in a C. briggsae relative. This pattern indicates that these introns represent losses in C. briggsae, not gains in C. elegans. In addition, 61% (25/41) of the reported gains in C. briggsae are present in the more distant C. briggsae relative, in a pattern suggesting that additional reported gains in C. elegans and/or C. briggsae may in fact represent unrecognized losses. These results underscore the dominance of intron loss over intron gain in recent eukaryotic evolution, the pitfalls associated with parsimony in inferring intron gains, and the importance of genomic sequencing of clusters of closely related species for drawing accurate inferences about genome evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16943250     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msl098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  25 in total

Review 1.  Intron creation and DNA repair.

Authors:  Hermann Ragg
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Evaluation of models of the mechanisms underlying intron loss and gain in Aspergillus fungi.

Authors:  Lei-Ying Zhang; Yu-Fei Yang; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes.

Authors:  Liran Carmel; Yuri I Wolf; Igor B Rogozin; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Reverse transcriptase and intron number evolution.

Authors:  Kemin Zhou; Alan Kuo; Igor V Grigoriev
Journal:  Stem Cell Investig       Date:  2014-09-28

5.  Alternative splicing: a missing piece in the puzzle of intron gain.

Authors:  Rosa Tarrío; Francisco J Ayala; Francisco Rodríguez-Trelles
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ubiquitous internal gene duplication and intron creation in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Why eukaryotic cells use introns to enhance gene expression: splicing reduces transcription-associated mutagenesis by inhibiting topoisomerase I cutting activity.

Authors:  Deng-Ke Niu; Yu-Fei Yang
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  Higher frequency of intron loss from the promoter proximally paused genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Li Jiang; Xue-Nan Li; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.160

Review 9.  Origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns.

Authors:  Igor B Rogozin; Liran Carmel; Miklos Csuros; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 4.540

10.  Tandem repeats modify the structure of human genes hosted in segmental duplications.

Authors:  Anna De Grassi; Francesca D Ciccarelli
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.