Literature DB >> 21592350

Why eukaryotic cells use introns to enhance gene expression: splicing reduces transcription-associated mutagenesis by inhibiting topoisomerase I cutting activity.

Deng-Ke Niu1, Yu-Fei Yang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The costs and benefits of spliceosomal introns in eukaryotes have not been established. One recognized effect of intron splicing is its known enhancement of gene expression. However, the mechanism regulating such splicing-mediated expression enhancement has not been defined. Previous studies have shown that intron splicing is a time-consuming process, indicating that splicing may not reduce the time required for transcription and processing of spliced pre-mRNA molecules; rather, it might facilitate the later rounds of transcription. Because the densities of active RNA polymerase II on most genes are less than one molecule per gene, direct interactions between the splicing apparatus and transcriptional complexes (from the later rounds of transcription) are infrequent, and thus unlikely to account for splicing-mediated gene expression enhancement. PRESENTATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS: The serine/arginine-rich protein SF2/ASF can inhibit the DNA topoisomerase I activity that removes negative supercoiling of DNA generated by transcription. Consequently, splicing could make genes more receptive to RNA polymerase II during the later rounds of transcription, and thus affect the frequency of gene transcription. Compared with the transcriptional enhancement mediated by strong promoters, intron-containing genes experience a lower frequency of cut-and-paste processes. The cleavage and religation activity of DNA strands by DNA topoisomerase I was recently shown to account for transcription-associated mutagenesis. Therefore, intron-mediated enhancement of gene expression could reduce transcription-associated genome instability. TESTING THE HYPOTHESIS: Experimentally test whether transcription-associated mutagenesis is lower in intron-containing genes than in intronless genes. Use bioinformatic analysis to check whether exons flanking lost introns have higher frequencies of short deletions. IMPLICATIONS OF THE HYPOTHESIS: The mechanism of intron-mediated enhancement proposed here may also explain the positive correlation observed between intron size and gene expression levels in unicellular organisms, and the greater number of intron containing genes in higher organisms. REVIEWERS: This article was reviewed by Dr Arcady Mushegian, Dr Igor B Rogozin (nominated by Dr I King Jordan) and Dr Alexey S Kondrashov. For the full reviews, please go to the Reviewer's Reports section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21592350      PMCID: PMC3118952          DOI: 10.1186/1745-6150-6-24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Direct        ISSN: 1745-6150            Impact factor:   4.540


  106 in total

Review 1.  Introns in gene evolution.

Authors:  Larisa Fedorova; Alexei Fedorov
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Evaluation of models of the mechanisms underlying intron loss and gain in Aspergillus fungi.

Authors:  Lei-Ying Zhang; Yu-Fei Yang; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Splicing in the eukaryotic ancestor: form, function and dysfunction.

Authors:  Scott William Roy; Manuel Irimia
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  The RNA-splicing factor PSF/p54 controls DNA-topoisomerase I activity by a direct interaction.

Authors:  T Straub; P Grue; A Uhse; M Lisby; B R Knudsen; T O Tange; O Westergaard; F Boege
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-10-09       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  A novel role for minimal introns: routing mRNAs to the cytosol.

Authors:  Jiang Zhu; Fuhong He; Dapeng Wang; Kan Liu; Dawei Huang; Jingfa Xiao; Jiayan Wu; Songnian Hu; Jun Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Intron loss and gain in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jasmin Coulombe-Huntington; Jacek Majewski
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Specific phosphorylation of SR proteins by mammalian DNA topoisomerase I.

Authors:  F Rossi; E Labourier; T Forné; G Divita; J Derancourt; J F Riou; E Antoine; G Cathala; C Brunel; J Tazi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Promoter-proximal introns in Arabidopsis thaliana are enriched in dispersed signals that elevate gene expression.

Authors:  Alan B Rose; Tali Elfersi; Genis Parra; Ian Korf
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Protecting exons from deleterious R-loops: a potential advantage of having introns.

Authors:  Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 4.540

10.  Spatial mapping of splicing factor complexes involved in exon and intron definition.

Authors:  Jonathan D Ellis; David Llères; Marco Denegri; Angus I Lamond; Javier F Cáceres
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  24 in total

1.  Intron sequences that stimulate gene expression in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Alan B Rose; Amanda Carter; Ian Korf; Noah Kojima
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Timing of Locomotor Recovery from Anoxia Modulated by the white Gene in Drosophila.

Authors:  Chengfeng Xiao; R Meldrum Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Autism risk genes are evolutionarily ancient and maintain a unique feature landscape that echoes their function.

Authors:  Emily L Casanova; Andrew E Switala; Srini Dandamudi; Allison R Hickman; Joshua Vandenbrink; Julia L Sharp; Frank Alex Feltus; Manuel F Casanova
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 5.216

Review 4.  Molecular-genetic imaging of cancer.

Authors:  Il Minn; Mitchell E Menezes; Siddik Sarkar; Keerthi Yarlagadda; Swadesh K Das; Luni Emdad; Devanand Sarkar; Paul B Fisher; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 6.242

5.  Evidence for a DNA-Based Mechanism of Intron-Mediated Enhancement.

Authors:  Alan B Rose; Shahram Emami; Keith Bradnam; Ian Korf
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Genome-wide cataloging and analysis of alternatively spliced genes in cereal crops.

Authors:  Xiang Jia Min; Brian Powell; Jonathan Braessler; John Meinken; Feng Yu; Gaurav Sablok
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Impact of MBL and MASP-2 gene polymorphism and its interaction on susceptibility to tuberculosis.

Authors:  Mengshi Chen; Ying Liang; Wufei Li; Mian Wang; Li Hu; Benjamin Kwaku Abuaku; Xin Huang; Hongzhuan Tan; Shi Wu Wen
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Molecular Evolution and Functional Diversification of Replication Protein A1 in Plants.

Authors:  Behailu B Aklilu; Kevin M Culligan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Trichoderma virens β-glucosidase I (BGLI) gene; expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae including docking and molecular dynamics studies.

Authors:  Gammadde Hewa Ishan Maduka Wickramasinghe; Pilimathalawe Panditharathna Attanayake Mudiyanselage Samith Indika Rathnayake; Naduviladath Vishvanath Chandrasekharan; Mahindagoda Siril Samantha Weerasinghe; Ravindra Lakshman Chundananda Wijesundera; Wijepurage Sandhya Sulochana Wijesundera
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Association of intron loss with high mutation rate in Arabidopsis: implications for genome size evolution.

Authors:  Yu-Fei Yang; Tao Zhu; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.