Literature DB >> 16941194

Young patients with hip fracture: a population-based study of bone mass and risk factors for osteoporosis.

C M Lofthus1, E K Osnes, H E Meyer, I S Kristiansen, L Nordsletten, J A Falch.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hip fracture in young patients is rare. The present study was aimed to clarify the comorbidity pattern and reveal relevant risk factors for osteoporosis and fracture in this patient group.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using electronic diagnosis registers and lists of the operating theatres for the Oslo hospitals, patients with new hip fracture during two 1-year periods from May 1994 through April 1995 and from May 1996 through April 1997 were identified. All patients age 20-49 years at the time of fracture were included (n=49), and a detailed medical history was recorded. Thirty-two of the patients volunteered for examination and completed a questionnaire and interview to reveal risk factors for osteoporosis. Data from the Oslo Health Study served as reference material. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual x-ray absorptiometry, and Z-scores were calculated using healthy subjects from Oslo as reference.
RESULTS: Of the patients identified, the median age was 40 years (range 25-49), and 63% were men. In 65% of the patients, the fracture occurred after a fall at the same level, in 16% it occurred after a fall from a higher level, and in 18% it occurred in a traffic accident. Twenty percent of the patients had a history of alcohol or drug abuse, 39% had neuromuscular diseases, and 12% had endocrine diseases. The patients examined had significantly more risk factors for osteoporosis than the reference population. The BMD expressed as Z-score for L2-4 was -1.0+/-0.9 (mean +/- SD; p<0.001), for femoral neck was -1.5+/-1.0 (p<0.001), and for total body was -1.3+/-1.1 (p<0.001). BMD was significantly lower than in controls for patients sustaining low-energy and high-energy trauma. There was a negative correlation between the total number of risk factors and BMD for lumbar spine (r=-0.35, p<0.05), femoral neck (r=-0.37, p=0.04), and total body (r=-0.55, p=0.001), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the young patients with hip fracture have a history of low-energy trauma, comorbidity predisposing for falls or decreased bone strength, as well as several risk factors for osteoporosis. The BMD was significantly lower than in the reference population regardless of the trauma mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16941194     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-006-0176-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  33 in total

1.  Lifetime physical activity and calcium intake related to bone density in young women.

Authors:  Lorraine Silver Wallace; Joyce E Ballard
Journal:  J Womens Health Gend Based Med       Date:  2002-05

2.  Local and national electronic databases in Norway demonstrate a varying degree of validity.

Authors:  C M Lofthus; I Cappelen; E K Osnes; J A Falch; I S Kristiansen; A W Medhus; L Nordsletten; H E Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Epidemiology of hip fractures.

Authors:  R G Cumming; M C Nevitt; S R Cummings
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Hip fractures in young patients: is this early osteoporosis?

Authors:  S D Boden; P Labropoulos; R Saunders
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Hip fracture epidemiology: a review.

Authors:  A Dubey; K J Koval; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  1999-09

6.  Femoral neck fractures in young adults.

Authors:  C H Zetterberg; L Irstam; G B Andersson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1982-06

7.  Age-related reductions in the strength of the femur tested in a fall-loading configuration.

Authors:  A C Courtney; E F Wachtel; E R Myers; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Fractures of the femoral neck in patients between the ages of twelve and forty-nine years.

Authors:  M F Swiontkowski; R A Winquist; S T Hansen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Risk factors for hip fracture in a high incidence area: a case-control study from Oslo, Norway.

Authors:  H E Meyer; C Henriksen; J A Falch; J I Pedersen; A Tverdal
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis in men, premenopausal women, and children.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  12 in total

1.  The impact of substance abuse on osteoporosis screening and risk of osteoporosis in women with psychotic disorders.

Authors:  D L Kelly; C S Myers; M T Abrams; S Feldman; J Park; R P McMahon; J-C Shim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Lower prevalence of hip fractures in foreign-born individuals than in Swedish-born individuals during the period 1987-1999.

Authors:  Björn Albin; Katarina Hjelm; Sölve Elmståhl
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Comorbidity and mortality after hip fracture in nineteen thousand six hundred and eighty two patients aged eighteen to sixty five years in Denmark from 1996 to 2012.

Authors:  Adam Omari; Christian Medom Madsen; Jes Bruun Lauritzen; Henrik Løvendahl Jørgensen; Fie Juhl Vojdeman
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  White matter lesions and the risk of incident hip fracture in older persons: results from the progetto veneto anziani study.

Authors:  Maria-Chiara Corti; Giovannella Baggio; Leonardo Sartori; Gianmaria Barbato; Enzo Manzato; Estella Musacchio; Luigi Ferrucci; Giulia Cardinali; Daniele Donato; Lenore J Launer; Sabina Zambon; Gaetano Crepaldi; Jack M Guralnik
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-10

5.  Assessing outcomes in hip fracture patients under the age of 60.

Authors:  David Keohane; Laith Al Azawi; Colum Downey; John F Quinlan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Hip fracture risk assessment: artificial neural network outperforms conditional logistic regression in an age- and sex-matched case control study.

Authors:  Wo-Jan Tseng; Li-Wei Hung; Jiann-Shing Shieh; Maysam F Abbod; Jinn Lin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Incidence and excess mortality of hip fracture in young adults: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Tsai-Hsueh Leu; Wei-Chun Chang; Jeff Chien-Fu Lin; Chi Lo; Wen-Miin Liang; Yu-Jun Chang; Dann-Pyng Shih; Cheng-Chun Wu; Chi-Fung Cheng; Sy-Jye Wei
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  High failure rate after internal fixation and beneficial outcome after arthroplasty in treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients between 55 and 70 years.

Authors:  Stefan Bartels; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Frede Frihagen; Cecilia Rogmark; Stein Erik Utvåg
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Secular reduction of excess mortality in hip fracture patients >85 years.

Authors:  Trine E Finnes; Haakon E Meyer; Jan A Falch; Asle W Medhus; Tore Wentzel-Larsen; Cathrine M Lofthus
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Risk factors for osteoporosis are common in young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures regardless of trauma mechanism.

Authors:  Amer N Al-Ani; Gustaf Neander; Bodil Samuelsson; Richard Blomfeldt; Wilhelmina Ekström; Margareta Hedström
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.