Literature DB >> 16941011

Basal phenotype of ductal carcinoma in situ: recognition and immunohistologic profile.

David J Dabbs1, Mamatha Chivukula, Gloria Carter, Rohit Bhargava.   

Abstract

The basal phenotype of breast carcinoma was demonstrated from a study of gene expression profiles, which demonstrated five carcinoma phenotypes with differing immunohistologic profiles and outcomes. The basal phenotype, so-named because of an immunohistologic profile that is similar to myoepithelial cells of the breast, has poor outcomes. While the invasive basal phenotype has been described, there is a paucity of literature regarding the existence or recognition of a precursor lesion. We searched our CoPath database for breast carcinomas in the age group of 37 years or less, and this yielded 98 cases from the years 2001 to April 2006. Pathology reports were screened for those cases that were negative for estrogen and progesterone receptors and HER-2/neu (triple negative). A total of 16 cases (16/98, 16%) fulfilled these criteria. Histology was reviewed and immunostains were performed for Cytokeratins 14, 17, and 5/6, vimentin, EGFR, c-kit, smooth muscle actin and p63. All 16 cases had a high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma, Nottingham score 9/9, with geographic necrosis, good circumscription and lymphoid infiltrates. Of the 16 cases, 13 exhibited at least one area of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The DCIS types were solid, flat or micropapillary, high nuclear grade, with comedonecrosis and invariably associated with intense lymphoid inflammatory cell infiltration. Of 16 invasive cases, 14 (88%) were positive for CK14, CK17, CK5/6 and EGFR; 94% were vimentin positive, while half or less of cases were positive for smooth muscle actin, c-kit or p63. All of the DCIS components demonstrated the same immunohistologic profile as the invasive component. A DCIS component of solid, flat or micropapillary type exists in the basal phenotype of breast carcinoma, and it demonstrates the same immunophenotype as the invasive carcinoma, typically positive for CK5/6, CK14, CK17, vimentin and EGFR, but negative for ER/PR and HER-2/neu.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16941011     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  35 in total

Review 1.  Molecular and cellular heterogeneity in breast cancer: challenges for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Ashley G Rivenbark; Siobhan M O'Connor; William B Coleman
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience?

Authors:  Lisa Carey; Eric Winer; Giuseppe Viale; David Cameron; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Breast cancer complexity: implications of intratumoral heterogeneity in clinical management.

Authors:  Brittany Haynes; Ashapurna Sarma; Pratima Nangia-Makker; Malathy P Shekhar
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.264

4.  Immunostaining of ∆Np63 (using the p40 antibody) is equal to that of p63 and CK5/6 in high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Verena Sailer; Christine Lüders; Walther Kuhn; Volker Pelzer; Glen Kristiansen
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Wnt/beta-catenin pathway activation is enriched in basal-like breast cancers and predicts poor outcome.

Authors:  Andrey I Khramtsov; Galina F Khramtsova; Maria Tretiakova; Dezheng Huo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Kathleen H Goss
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Pathologic progression of mammary carcinomas in a C3(1)/SV40 T/t-antigen transgenic rat model of human triple-negative and Her2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  M J Hoenerhoff; M A Shibata; A Bode; J E Green
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Biomarker expression and risk of subsequent tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Annette M Molinaro; Mona L Gauthier; Hal K Berman; Fred Waldman; James Bennington; Henry Sanchez; Cynthia Jimenez; Kim Stewart; Karen Chew; Britt-Marie Ljung; Thea D Tlsty
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Mammary tumors initiated by constitutive Cdk2 activation contain an invasive basal-like component.

Authors:  Patrick E Corsino; Bradley J Davis; Peter H Nørgaard; Nicole N Teoh Parker; Mary Law; William Dunn; Brian K Law
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.715

9.  Proteomic characterization of breast cancer xenografts identifies early and late bevacizumab-induced responses and predicts effective drug combinations.

Authors:  Evita M Lindholm; Marit Krohn; Sergio Iadevaia; Alexandr Kristian; Gordon B Mills; Gunhild M Mælandsmo; Olav Engebraaten
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  In search of triple-negative DCIS: tumor-type dependent model of breast cancer progression from DCIS to the invasive cancer.

Authors:  Sven Kurbel
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2012-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.