Literature DB >> 16940884

Impact of prior abdominal or pelvic surgery on colonoscopy outcomes.

Sang Kil Lee1, Tae Il Kim, Sung Jae Shin, Byung Chang Kim, Won Ho Kim.   

Abstract

GOALS: This large prospective study attempted to analyze the effect of various prior surgery on colonoscopy performance.
BACKGROUND: It is generally presumed that colonoscopy in patients with a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery is difficult. This difficulty is apparently due to adhesions and anatomic alterations after surgery but the incidence, site, and severity of adhesions are different according to the types of surgery. STUDY: We analyzed completion rate and insertion time in 4089 consecutive colonoscopies in patients with intact colon.
RESULTS: The adjusted completion rate for colonoscopy was 96.7%. The mean insertion time was 6.2+/-4.0 minutes. Not only old age [odds ratio (OR) 1.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.04, 2.04]] and inadequate bowel cleansing (OR 5.82; 95% CI [4.19, 8.09]) but also a surgical history (OR 1.71; 95% CI [1.18, 2.48]) were independent factors associated with procedural incompleteness. Of surgical history, gastrectomy and hysterectomy were significantly associated with procedural incompleteness (P<0.001 and P=0.001, respectively). Old age (OR 1.48; 95% CI [1.22, 1.79]), female sex (OR 1.22; 95% CI [1.01, 1.48]), constipation as an indication (OR 1.58; 95% CI [1.24, 2.02]), and inadequate bowel cleansing (OR 1.46; 95% CI [1.13, 1.88]) were independent factors associated with prolonged insertion time (>10 min), but a surgical history lost statistical power as a predictor for prolonged insertion time in multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the difference in insertion time was not substantial, a history of abdominal or pelvic surgery is associated with difficulty in colonoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16940884     DOI: 10.1097/00004836-200609000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  13 in total

1.  Factors affecting colonoscope insertion time in patients with or without a colostomy after left-sided colorectal resection.

Authors:  Hui Won Jang; Yoon Nam Kim; Chung Mo Nam; Hyun Jung Lee; Soo Jung Park; Sung Pil Hong; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim; Jae Hee Cheon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Risk factors associated with longer cecal intubation time: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Veeravich Jaruvongvanich; Tomoki Sempokuya; Passisd Laoveeravat; Patompong Ungprasert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Factors affecting insertion time for colonoscopy performed under intramuscular analgesia in patients with history of colorectal resection.

Authors:  Hui Won Jang; Jae Hee Cheon; Chung Mo Nam; Chang Mo Moon; Jin Ha Lee; Soung Min Jeon; Jae Jun Park; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Effect of hysterectomy on colonoscopy completion rate.

Authors:  Melanie Lacasse; Geneviève Dufresne; Emilie Jolicoeur; Luc Rochon; Charles Sabbagh; Jocelyn Deneault; Valérie Walsh; Isabelle Gaboury; Philip Hassard
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 5.  Effects of Acupuncture on Adverse Events in Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Qing Xia; Fangyi Zhu; Wei Huang; Yanting Meng; Yanping Wang; Yumei Liu; Xijun Liu; Hulun Li; Bo Sun
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2022-08-03

6.  Colonoscopy Insertion in Patients with Gastrectomy: Does Position Impact Cecal Intubation Time?

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kim; Youn Jung Choi; Hye Jung Kwon; Gyu Man Oh; Kyoungwon Jung; Sung Eun Kim; Won Moon; Moo In Park; Seun Ja Park
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 3.487

7.  Which should go first during same-day upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy? A randomized prospective study focusing on colonoscopy performance.

Authors:  Ja Sung Choi; Young Hoon Youn; Sang Kil Lee; Jin Yi Choi; Hee Man Kim; Yu Jin Kim; Ki Jun Han; Hyeon Geun Cho; Si Young Song; Jae Hee Cho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The water method is effective in difficult colonoscopy - it enhances cecal intubation in unsedated patients with a history of abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Felix W Leung; Surinder K Mann; Joseph W Leung; Rodelei M Siao-Salera; Jackson Guy
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10-01

9.  Do indication and demographics for colonoscopy affect completion? A large national database evaluation.

Authors:  Maneesh Gupta; Jennifer L Holub; Glenn Eisen
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.566

10.  Effect of a proprietary intraluminal stiffening wire device on cecal intubation time and rate with used colonoscopes; a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey M East
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.