Literature DB >> 16938783

Some benefits and limitations of binaural cochlear implants and our ability to measure them.

Richard S Tyler1, William Noble, Camille Dunn, Shelley Witt.   

Abstract

We review new recognition and localization skills in patients using one or two cochlear implant(s). We observed one unilateral patient who showed localization performance above chance. We also provide evidence for binaural processing in bilateral cochlear implant patients, even when tested with speech from the front without noise. We unsuccessfully attempted to find correlations between localization and squelch, between these variables and pre-implant threshold differences, or these variables and post-implant recognition differences. We strongly believe that new tests are needed to examine the potential benefit of two implants. We describe three tests that we use to show a binaural advantage: cued recognition, movement direction, and recognition with multiple jammers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16938783     DOI: 10.1080/14992020600783095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  18 in total

1.  Statistical bias in the assessment of binaural benefit relative to the better ear.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Simulation study of power and sample size for repeated measures with multinomial outcomes: an application to sound direction identification experiments (SDIE).

Authors:  Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  William House Cochlear Implant Study Group: position statement on bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Thomas Balkany; Anelle Hodges; Fred Telischi; Ronald Hoffman; Jane Madell; Simon Parisier; Bruce Gantz; Richard Tyler; Robert Peters; Ruth Litovsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Models of brainstem responses to bilateral electrical stimulation.

Authors:  H Steven Colburn; Yoojin Chung; Yi Zhou; Andrew Brughera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-22

5.  Effects of simulated spectral holes on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking under binaural and monaural listening.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) Changes Over Time in Adults With Simultaneous Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Juan Zhang; Richard Tyler; Haihong Ji; Camille Dunn; Ningyu Wang; Marlan Hansen; Bruce Gantz
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Ann Perreau; Bruce Gantz; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Performance over time on adults with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Son-A Chang; Richard S Tyler; Camille C Dunn; Haihong Ji; Shelley A Witt; Bruce Gantz; Marlan Hansen
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation: speech perception and localization pre- and post-second cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Richard S Tyler; Shelley Witt; Haihong Ji; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Self-reported spatial hearing abilities across different cochlear implant profiles.

Authors:  Ann E Perreau; Hua Ou; Richard Tyler; Camille Dunn
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.