Literature DB >> 16937234

The management of families affected by hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC).

Johanne Geary1, Huw J W Thomas, James Mackay, Huw Dorkins, Julian Barwell, Shirley V Hodgson.   

Abstract

This study assessed current practice and methods for improvement in the management of families with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). HNPCC families registered at five London Genetics Centres and a specialised Colorectal family cancer clinic (CFCC) were identified. Ascertainment of management and outcome details were obtained by scrutiny of patient records and by correspondence with General practitioners (GPs). Two hundred and three families with HNPCC were identified. 79.5% (403/507) of at-risk relatives ascertained were contacted by the genetics centres, and 80.2% (65/81) by the CFCC (P = 1.0). 54.8% (211/385) of probands and relatives within genetics centres' catchment areas were advised to undertake a surveillance programme, compared with 82.1% (64/78) of those cared for by the CFCC (P < 4.2 x 10(-6)). Adherence to surveillance guidelines was 76.6% (49/64) in individuals cared for by the only centre that undertook responsibility for surveillance follow-up (CFCC) and 41.7% (88/211) for the genetics centres, which did not assume responsibility (P < 8.9 x 10(-7)) (using two sided P-values for P (O > or = E/O < or = E)). 15.3% of GPs were unaware their patient had been recommended a surveillance programme, 65% did not know who was responsible for ensuring surveillance follow-up. A questionnaire to fifteen UK genetics centres demonstrated that the majority (86.7%) did not assume responsibility for surveillance follow-up. Since surveillance adherence is clearly better where centres assume responsibility for follow-up, it is recommended that regional or national registers of HNPCC families be developed and maintained to ensure effective management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16937234     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-006-9000-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of a counselling protocol for predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  K Aktan-Collan; J P Mecklin; A de la Chapelle; P Peltomäki; A Uutela; H Kääriäinen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  The colon cancer burden of genetically defined hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer.

Authors:  W S Samowitz; K Curtin; H H Lin; M A Robertson; D Schaffer; M Nichols; K Gruenthal; M F Leppert; M L Slattery
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review.

Authors:  S W Vernon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: later age of onset.

Authors:  Heather Hampel; Julie A Stephens; Eero Pukkala; Risto Sankila; Lauri A Aaltonen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Albert de la Chapelle
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Screening behavior of individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Fred H Menko; Babs G Taal; Irma Kluijt; Lidwina D V Wever; Miranda A Gerritsma; Hans F A Vasen; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Colon cancer screening practices following genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) mutations.

Authors:  Chanita Hughes Halbert; Henry Lynch; Jane Lynch; David Main; Susan Kucharski; Anil K Rustgi; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-09-27

7.  Modeling adherence to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  R E Myers; E Ross; C Jepson; T Wolf; A Balshem; L Millner; H Leventhal
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Centralized registration, prophylactic examination, and treatment results in improved prognosis in familial adenomatous polyposis. Results from the Danish Polyposis Register.

Authors:  S Bülow; C Bülow; T F Nielsen; L Karlsen; F Moesgaard
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nicolle M Gatto; Harold Frucht; Vijaya Sundararajan; Judith S Jacobson; Victor R Grann; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-02-05       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Guidance on gastrointestinal surveillance for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, familial adenomatous polypolis, juvenile polyposis, and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.

Authors:  M G Dunlop
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  3 in total

1.  Strategies to identify the Lynch syndrome among patients with colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Grace Wang; Jonathan Terdiman; Amie Blanco; Miriam Kuppermann; C Richard Boland; James Ford; Elena Elkin; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Hereditary colorectal cancer registries in Canada: report from the Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada consensus meeting; Montreal, Quebec; October 28, 2011.

Authors:  H Rothenmund; H Singh; B Candas; B N Chodirker; K Serfas; M Aronson; S Holter; A Volenik; J Green; E Dicks; M O Woods; D Gilchrist; R Gryfe; Z Cohen; W D Foulkes
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Lynch syndrome: barriers to and facilitators of screening and disease management.

Authors:  Kathy E Watkins; Christine Y Way; Jacqueline J Fiander; Robert J Meadus; Mary Jane Esplen; Jane S Green; Valerie C Ludlow; Holly A Etchegary; Patrick S Parfrey
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.857

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.