Literature DB >> 8545620

Centralized registration, prophylactic examination, and treatment results in improved prognosis in familial adenomatous polyposis. Results from the Danish Polyposis Register.

S Bülow1, C Bülow, T F Nielsen, L Karlsen, F Moesgaard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the last few decades numerous regional and national registers have been established all over the world with the aim of improving survival in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). The Danish Polyposis Register was founded in 1971 and coordinates the screening and subsequent prophylactic colectomy of FAP patients.
METHODS: The crude cumulative survival in 321 patients (205 probands and 116 call-up cases) with verified FAP was calculated in accordance with the life-table method.
RESULTS: At the time of diagnosis of FAP only 2 of 116 (2%) had colorectal cancer versus 142 of 205 probands (69%). The 10-year cumulative survival was 94% (95% confidence limits, 89-99) in call-up cases compared with only 41% (34-49) in probands (p < 0.00001), and survival improved significantly (p < 0.00001) after the establishment of the Danish Polyposis Register.
CONCLUSION: The establishment of a centralized polyposis register has resulted in a substantial improvement of the prognosis in FAP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8545620     DOI: 10.3109/00365529509096343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  22 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer screening. Recommendation statement from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  [Staging of colorectal cancer. Official recommendations of the Canadian Study Group on Preventive Medicine].

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Colorectal cancer screening. Recommendation statement from the Canadian task force on preventive health care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  The double-barreled wet ileostomy: an alternative method for simultaneous urinary and intestinal diversion without intestinal anastomosis after total colectomy and pelvic exenteration.

Authors:  Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Fabio Terabe; Benedito Mauro Rossi; Samuel Aguiar Júnior; Fabio de Oliveira Ferreira; Wilson Toshihiko Nakagawa; Ademar Lopes
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Risk factors predicting intra-abdominal desmoids in familial adenomatous polyposis: a single centre experience.

Authors:  A Sinha; P P Tekkis; K F Neale; R K S Phillips; S K Clark
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Colorectal cancer: no longer the issue in familial adenomatous polyposis?

Authors:  Daniel C Gibbons; Ashish Sinha; Robin K S Phillips; Susan K Clark
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  The management of families affected by hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC).

Authors:  Johanne Geary; Huw J W Thomas; James Mackay; Huw Dorkins; Julian Barwell; Shirley V Hodgson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques and the risks of late delayed bleeding.

Authors:  Peter John Basford; Regi George; Emma Nixon; Tehreem Chaudhuri; Rob Mead; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Inherited colorectal cancer syndromes.

Authors:  C Neal Ellis
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

Review 10.  Surgical considerations in FAP-related pouch surgery: Could we do better?

Authors:  Gabriela Möslein
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.