Literature DB >> 16935284

Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos.

Kevin S Richter1, Sharon K Shipley, Ingrid McVearry, Michael J Tucker, Eric A Widra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate viability and implantation potential of cryopreserved blastocysts according to the day of blastocyst expansion and cryopreservation.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Private ART center. PATIENT(S): Three hundred and seventy-five patients undergoing embryo transfer with cryopreserved blastocysts. INTERVENTION(S): Blastocyst cryopreservation on day 5, 6, or 7 after oocyte retrieval according to the day of blastocyst expansion and subsequent embryo transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate (PR) per embryo transfer. RESULT(S): Clinical PRs were similar between blastocysts cryopreserved on day 5 and blastocysts cryopreserved on day 6 (32% vs. 28%). The clinical PR was lower for blastocysts cryopreserved on day 7 (15%), but this difference was not statistically significant after accounting for the number of embryos per transfer (P=.15). CONCLUSION(S): Viability and implantation potential are similar for day 5 and day 6 blastocyst cryopreservation. Viability may be reduced for blastocysts cryopreserved on day 7, but not to the extent suggested by reports of fresh transfers. These results suggest that reduced success rates associated with fresh transfers of later developing blastocysts may be the result of asynchrony with endometrial receptivity instead of poorer embryo quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16935284     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  24 in total

1.  A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Ho; Irene Woo; Kristin Louie; Wael Salem; Sami I Jabara; Kristin A Bendikson; Richard J Paulson; Karine Chung
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The slow growing embryo and premature progesterone elevation: compounding factors for embryo-endometrial asynchrony.

Authors:  Mae Wu Healy; Meghan Yamasaki; George Patounakis; Kevin S Richter; Kate Devine; Alan H DeCherney; Micah J Hill
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Premature formation of nucleolar channel systems indicates advanced endometrial maturation following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  G Zapantis; M J Szmyga; E A Rybak; U T Meier
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mathilde Bourdon; Khaled Pocate-Cheriet; Astri Finet de Bantel; Veronika Grzegorczyk-Martin; Aureli Amar Hoffet; Elisangela Arbo; Marine Poulain; Pietro Santulli
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Primate preimplantation embryo is a target for relaxin during early pregnancy.

Authors:  Catherine A Vandevoort; Namdori R Mtango; Keith E Latham; Dennis R Stewart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Freeze-all cycle for all normal responders?

Authors:  Matheus Roque; Marcello Valle; Fernando Guimarães; Marcos Sampaio; Selmo Geber
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Case report: two successful pregnancies following the transfer of re-vitrified human day 7 blastocysts developed from vitrified cleaved embryos.

Authors:  Kenichiro Hiraoka; Yumi Fujimoto; Yuko Tateaki; Kaori Hiraoka; Toshitaka Horiuchi; Shinichiro Okano; Masayuki Kinutani; Kazuo Kinutani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Perinatal outcomes following transfer of human blastocysts vitrified at day 5, 6 and 7.

Authors:  Kenichiro Hiraoka; Kaori Hiraoka; Miyuki Miyazaki; Emi Fukunaga; Toshitaka Horiuchi; Tomoyo Kusuda; Shinichiro Okano; Masayuki Kinutani; Kazuo Kinutani
Journal:  J Exp Clin Assist Reprod       Date:  2009-10-20

9.  Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles.

Authors:  Eric D Levens; Brian W Whitcomb; Sasha Hennessy; Aidita N James; Belinda J Yauger; Frederick W Larsen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Factors affecting the outcome of human blastocyst vitrification.

Authors:  Amr A Kader; Audrey Choi; Yasser Orief; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.