Literature DB >> 24052503

Premature formation of nucleolar channel systems indicates advanced endometrial maturation following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

G Zapantis1, M J Szmyga, E A Rybak, U T Meier.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a shift in the timing of nucleolar channel system (NCS) formation following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)? SUMMARY ANSWER: NCSs appear prematurely following COH compared with natural cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: During natural cycles, NCSs of endometrial epithelial cell (EEC) nuclei are exclusively present during the window of implantation and are uniformly distributed throughout the upper endometrial cavity. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Prospective two-cohort study. Cohorts I and II each consisted of seven volunteers for the duration of three menstrual study cycles that were separated by at least one wash-out or rest cycle, between December 2008 and May 2012. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Participants were recruited from a pool of healthy oocyte donors. Consecutive endometrial biopsies were obtained during the same luteal phase on cycle days (CD) 16, 20 and 26 for Cohort I, and on CD14, 22 and 24 for Cohort II, following random assignment to a natural cycle group, a COH cycle group (using a GnRH antagonist), or a COH cycle group receiving luteal phase hormonal supplementation (COH + S). The day of oocyte retrieval was designated CD14 in COH cycles and the day of the LH surge was designated CD13 in natural cycles. Prevalence of NCSs in the nuclei of EECs was quantified using indirect immunofluorescence with an antibody directed against a subset of related nuclear pore complex proteins that are major constituents of NCSs. Progesterone and estradiol levels were measured on the day of each endometrial biopsy. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The natural cycle group exhibited peak NCS prevalence on CD20 [53.3%; interquartile range (IQR) 28.5-55.8], which rapidly declined on CD22 (11.8%; IQR 6.3-17.6), CD24 (2.5%; IQR 0.0-9.2) and CD26 (0.3%; IQR 0.0-3.5), and no NCSs on CD14 and 16 defining a short NCS window around CD20. In contrast, in COH and COH + S cycles, NCS prevalence was high already on CD16 (40.4%; IQR 22.6-53.4 and 35.6%; IQR 26.4-44.5, respectively; P = 0.001 compared with CD16 of the natural cycle group, Mann-Whitney), whereas no significant difference in NCS prevalence was detected on any of the other five CDs between the three groups (P > 0.05). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The cohort size was small (n = 7) but was offset by the all-or-none presence of NCSs on CD16 in natural versus COH and COH + S cycles and the fact that each subject served as her own control. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Premature appearance of NCSs and hence maturation of the endometrium following COH is consistent with previous studies based on histological dating but contradicts studies based on mRNA expression profiling, which reported a lag in endometrial maturation. However, this is the first study of this kind that is based on consecutive endometrial biopsies within the same cycle and that reports such clear-cut differences: no versus robust NCS presence on CD16. Our observation of advanced endometrial maturation following COH may contribute to the reduced implantation rates seen in fresh compared with frozen and donor IVF-embryo transfer cycles. Therefore, the NCS window could serve as a sensitive guide for timing of embryo transfer in frozen and donor cycles. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study was supported by the March of Dimes Birth Defects foundation (1-FY09-363 to U.T.M.); Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Parsippany, NJ; East Coast Fertility, Plainview, NY and the CMBG Training Program (T32 GM007491 to M.J.S.). We report no competing interests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endometrial receptivity; immunodetection; nucleolar channel system; ovarian hyperstimulation; window of implantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24052503      PMCID: PMC3895983          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  53 in total

1.  Endometrial morphology in stimulated in vitro fertilization cycles and after steroid replacement therapy in cases of primary ovarian failure.

Authors:  M F Dehou; B Lejeune; C Arijs; F Leroy
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  The three dimensional structure of the nucleolar channel system in the endometrial glandular cell: serial sectioning and high voltage electron microscopic studies.

Authors:  I A More; D McSeveney
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  The ultrastructural response of human endometrium to medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Authors:  D K Roberts; D V Horbelt; L C Powell
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-12-15       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Endometrial gene expression in the early luteal phase is impacted by mode of triggering final oocyte maturation in recFSH stimulated and GnRH antagonist co-treated IVF cycles.

Authors:  P Humaidan; I Van Vaerenbergh; C Bourgain; B Alsbjerg; C Blockeel; F Schuit; L Van Lommel; P Devroey; H Fatemi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Matched-cohort comparison of single-embryo transfers in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles.

Authors:  Bruce S Shapiro; Said T Daneshmand; Humberto Restrepo; Forest C Garner; Martha Aguirre; Cynthia Hudson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Profiling the gene signature of endometrial receptivity: clinical results.

Authors:  Tamara Garrido-Gómez; María Ruiz-Alonso; David Blesa; Patricia Diaz-Gimeno; Felipe Vilella; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Normal human endometrium. An ultrastructural survey.

Authors:  F J Cornillie; J M Lauweryns; I A Brosens
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity.

Authors:  Patricia Díaz-Gimeno; Maria Ruiz-Alonso; David Blesa; Nuria Bosch; José A Martínez-Conejero; Pilar Alamá; Nicolás Garrido; Antonio Pellicer; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Quantification of nucleolar channel systems: uniform presence throughout the upper endometrial cavity.

Authors:  Michael J Szmyga; Eli A Rybak; Edward J Nejat; Erika H Banks; Kathleen D Whitney; Alex J Polotsky; Debra S Heller; U Thomas Meier
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  In vivo production of the nucleolar channel system in post menopausal endometrium.

Authors:  J Pryse-Davies; T A Ryder; M L MacKenzie
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  14 in total

1.  Progesterone Threshold Determines Nucleolar Channel System Formation in Human Endometrium.

Authors:  Edward J Nejat; Michael J Szmyga; Gregory Zapantis; U Thomas Meier
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  Supraphysiologic estradiol is an independent predictor of low birth weight in full-term singletons born after fresh embryo transfer.

Authors:  N Pereira; R T Elias; P J Christos; A C Petrini; K Hancock; J P Lekovich; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Gonadotropin dose is negatively correlated with live birth rate: analysis of more than 650,000 assisted reproductive technology cycles.

Authors:  Valerie L Baker; Morton B Brown; Barbara Luke; George W Smith; James J Ireland
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Presence of endometrial nucleolar channel systems at the time of frozen embryo transfer in hormone replacement cycles with successful implantation.

Authors:  Rachel S Gerber; Erkan Buyuk; Gregory Zapantis; Harry Lieman; U Thomas Meier
Journal:  F S Sci       Date:  2021-01-10

Review 5.  The Role of Lamins in the Nucleoplasmic Reticulum, a Pleiomorphic Organelle That Enhances Nucleo-Cytoplasmic Interplay.

Authors:  Merel Stiekema; Frederik Houben; Fons Verheyen; Marcel Borgers; Julia Menzel; Martin Meschkat; Marc A M J van Zandvoort; Frans C S Ramaekers; Jos L V Broers
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 6.  Why we should transfer frozen instead of fresh embryos: the translational rationale.

Authors:  Rachel Weinerman; Monica Mainigi
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  The lipidome of endometrial fluid differs between implantative and non-implantative IVF cycles.

Authors:  Roberto Matorras; Ibon Martinez-Arranz; Enara Arretxe; Marta Iruarrizaga-Lejarreta; Blanca Corral; Jone Ibañez-Perez; Antonia Exposito; Begoña Prieto; Felix Elortza; Cristina Alonso
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Traditional Chinese Medicine, the Zishen Yutai Pill, Ameliorates Precocious Endometrial Maturation Induced by Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation and Improves Uterine Receptivity via Upregulation of HOXA10.

Authors:  Qi Gao; Lu Han; Xiumei Li; Xia Cai
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  When is the optimal timing of frozen embryo transfer after controlled ovarian stimulation?

Authors:  Hyun Joo Lee; Jong Kil Joo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04

Review 10.  Progesterone administration for luteal phase deficiency in human reproduction: an old or new issue?

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Susanna Santagni; Giovanni Battista La Sala
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.