Literature DB >> 16932112

Adapting pediatric DXA scanning to clinical orthopaedics.

Elizabeth A Szalay1, Debra Harriman.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis and low bone density for age is increasingly recognized in children yet poorly understood and often overlooked. DXA scanning in children is problematic due to lack of guidelines and inexperience of most DXA practitioners. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry recommends spine or total body scans as the preferred skeletal sites for study in children, yet we find multiple regional scans to be far more useful in the clinical practice of pediatric DXA scanning, especially in a pediatric orthopaedic setting. DXA scans of 119 children are reviewed: 20% of the children had orthopaedic hardware or other artifact that would have rendered the whole body scan unusable. In 20 of 119 patients, the only scan that could be obtained, either due to contracture or patient cooperation, was the distal lateral femoral scan. Scanning multiple regions of interest including spine, hip, and/or distal lateral femora as indicated is the recommended protocol for assessment of BMD in the pediatric orthopaedic setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16932112     DOI: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000230330.88534.3a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  8 in total

1.  Children with spina bifida are at risk for low bone density.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Szalay; Asad Cheema
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  The Utility of DXA Assessment at the Forearm, Proximal Femur, and Lateral Distal Femur, and Vertebral Fracture Assessment in the Pediatric Population: 2019 ISCD Official Position.

Authors:  David R Weber; Alison Boyce; Catherine Gordon; Wolfgang Högler; Heidi H Kecskemethy; Madhusmita Misra; Diana Swolin-Eide; Peter Tebben; Leanne M Ward; Halley Wasserman; Christopher Shuhart; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Bone mineral density in pediatric patients with meningomyelocele.

Authors:  Ihsan Kafadar; Betul Aydin Kilic; Figen Koymen Yilmaz; Mustafa Kilic
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Reliability of lateral distal femur dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measures.

Authors:  Nicole M Mueske; Linda S Chan; Tishya A L Wren
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Evaluation of bone density in infancy and adolescence. Review of medical literature and personal experience.

Authors:  Luisella Pedrotti; Barbara Bertani; Gabriella Tuvo; Francesca Barone; Ilaria Crivellari; Stefano Lucanto; Mora Redento
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2010-05

6.  A hip analysis protocol for pediatric bone densitometry: the Iowa Bone Development Study.

Authors:  Julie M Eichenberger Gilmore; Cynthia A Pauley; Trudy L Burns; James C Torner; Elena M Letuchy; Kathleen F Janz; Marcia C Willing; Steven M Levy
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 7.  Osteoporosis in paediatric patients with spina bifida.

Authors:  Humberto Marreiros; Humberto Filipe Marreiros; Clara Loff; Eulalia Calado
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Normative data for bone mass in healthy term infants from birth to 1 year of age.

Authors:  Sina Gallo; Catherine A Vanstone; Hope A Weiler
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2012-10-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.