Elizabeth A Szalay1, Asad Cheema. 1. University of New Mexico, Carrie Tingley Hospital, 1127 University Boulevard NE, Albuquerque, NM 87102, USA. ESzalay@salud.unm.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with spina bifida frequently sustain lower extremity fractures which may be difficult to diagnose because they feel little or no pain, although the relative contributions of low bone density to pain insensitivity are unclear. Routine dual-energy xray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning is unreliable because these patients lack bony elements in the spine, and many have joint contractures and/or implanted hardware. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked (1) if the lateral distal femoral scan is useful in spina bifida; (2) whether nonambulatory children with spina bifida exhibit differences in bone mineral density (BMD) compared with an age-and-sex-matched population; and (3) whether Z-scores were related to extremity fracture incidence. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 37 patients with spina bifida who had DXA scans and sufficient data. Z-scores were correlated with functional level, ambulatory status, body mass index, and fracture history. RESULTS: The distal femoral scan could be performed in subjects for whom total body and/or lumbar scans could not be performed accurately. Twenty-four of 37 had Z-scores below -2 SD, defined as "low bone density for age." Ten of 35 patients (29%) with fracture information had experienced one or more fractures. Our sample size was too small to correlate Z-score with fracture. CONCLUSION: We believe BMD should be monitored in patients with spina bifida; nonambulatory patients with spina bifida and those with other risk factors are more likely to have low bone density for age than unaffected individuals. The LDF scan was useful in this population in whom lumbar and total body scans are often invalidated by contracture or artifact. Although lower extremity fractures occur regardless of ambulation or bone density, knowing an individual's bone health status may lead to interventions to improve bone health.
BACKGROUND:Patients with spina bifida frequently sustain lower extremity fractures which may be difficult to diagnose because they feel little or no pain, although the relative contributions of low bone density to pain insensitivity are unclear. Routine dual-energy xray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning is unreliable because these patients lack bony elements in the spine, and many have joint contractures and/or implanted hardware. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked (1) if the lateral distal femoral scan is useful in spina bifida; (2) whether nonambulatory children with spina bifida exhibit differences in bone mineral density (BMD) compared with an age-and-sex-matched population; and (3) whether Z-scores were related to extremity fracture incidence. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 37 patients with spina bifida who had DXA scans and sufficient data. Z-scores were correlated with functional level, ambulatory status, body mass index, and fracture history. RESULTS: The distal femoral scan could be performed in subjects for whom total body and/or lumbar scans could not be performed accurately. Twenty-four of 37 had Z-scores below -2 SD, defined as "low bone density for age." Ten of 35 patients (29%) with fracture information had experienced one or more fractures. Our sample size was too small to correlate Z-score with fracture. CONCLUSION: We believe BMD should be monitored in patients with spina bifida; nonambulatory patients with spina bifida and those with other risk factors are more likely to have low bone density for age than unaffected individuals. The LDF scan was useful in this population in whom lumbar and total body scans are often invalidated by contracture or artifact. Although lower extremity fractures occur regardless of ambulation or bone density, knowing an individual's bone health status may lead to interventions to improve bone health.
Authors: Richard C Henderson; Robert K Lark; Jamie E Newman; Heidi Kecskemethy; Ellen B Fung; Jordan B Renner; H Theodore Harcke Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Richard C Henderson; Robert K Lark; Matthew J Gurka; Gordon Worley; Ellen B Fung; Mark Conaway; Virginia A Stallings; Richard D Stevenson Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Aliya A Khan; Laura Bachrach; Jacques P Brown; David A Hanley; Robert G Josse; David L Kendler; Edward S Leib; Brian C Lentle; William D Leslie; E Michael Lewiecki; Paul D Miller; R Larry Nicholson; Christopher O'Brien; Wojciech P Olszynski; M Y Diane Theriault; Nelson B Watts Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2004 Impact factor: 2.963
Authors: David R Weber; Alison Boyce; Catherine Gordon; Wolfgang Högler; Heidi H Kecskemethy; Madhusmita Misra; Diana Swolin-Eide; Peter Tebben; Leanne M Ward; Halley Wasserman; Christopher Shuhart; Babette S Zemel Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Cheri A Blauwet; Emily M Brook; Adam S Tenforde; Elizabeth Broad; Caroline H Hu; Eliza Abdu-Glass; Elizabeth G Matzkin Journal: Sports Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 11.136