Literature DB >> 16931964

Widespread high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostatic needle biopsy: a significant likelihood of subsequently diagnosed adenocarcinoma.

George J Netto1, Jonathan I Epstein.   

Abstract

In comparison with earlier studies, recent reports have demonstrated a lower incidence of prostate carcinoma after an initial diagnosis of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN). The latter has led to a general tendency to reconsider the absolute need for a rebiopsy in this setting. The current retrospective study assesses the subsequent likelihood of identifying prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) in 41 patients with an initial diagnosis of "widespread" HGPIN defined as HGPIN present in 4 or more biopsy cores. All patients underwent at least 1 follow-up (F/U) sampling procedure in a period of 1 to 41 months. PCa was found in 16/41 patients (39%), all except 1 identified on the first F/U biopsy with the remaining patients diagnosed on a transurethral resection after a negative first F/U biopsy. All but 1 prostatic carcinoma diagnoses were obtained within 2 years from initial biopsy with 10 rendered within the first year. On average, prostate cancer was identified at 10.4 months (range: 1 to 36). One-fourth of all identified prostatic carcinomas were of Gleason score 7 or more. In 4 additional patients (9.7%), F/U biopsy revealed HGPIN with adjacent atypical small glands suspicious but not diagnostic of carcinoma (PINATYP). Of 41 patients, 10 (24.3%) continued to show HGPIN with the remaining 11/41 patients (26.8%) showing benign prostatic tissue. Patients >or=70 years of age at the time of initial biopsy had a statistically significant higher rate of PCa or HGPIN/PINATYP diagnosis on repeat biopsy compared with younger patients (P=0.02), with 55% of older men being diagnosed with cancer as compared with 33% in younger men. Patients with fewer cores sampled on initial biopsy were more likely to be diagnosed with carcinoma as opposed to HGPIN/PINATYP on F/U (P=0.015). Other factors such as the number of F/U procedures, serum prostate-specific antigen level before initial HGPIN biopsy, number of cores per F/U biopsy, and F/U interval length did not affect the likelihood of finding carcinoma. In summary, our study reveals a 39% risk of finding PCa on repeat biopsies obtained after an initial diagnosis of widespread HGPIN. Our findings support the need for a repeat biopsy in this subset of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16931964     DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213324.97294.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  14 in total

1.  Is repeat biopsy for isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia necessary?

Authors:  Arnold I Chin; Dhiren S Dave; Jacob Rajfer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

2.  Characterization of TMPRSS2-ERG fusion high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and potential clinical implications.

Authors:  Juan-Miguel Mosquera; Sven Perner; Elizabeth M Genega; Martin Sanda; Matthias D Hofer; Kirsten D Mertz; Pamela L Paris; Jeff Simko; Tarek A Bismar; Gustavo Ayala; Rajal B Shah; Massimo Loda; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Managing high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and atypical glands on prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Ridwan Alam; Mark W Ball; H Ballentine Carter; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Synoptic Versus Narrative Reporting of Prostate Biopsies at a Tertiary Healthcare Institution: Challenges, successes and expectations.

Authors:  Nnamdi O Orah; Charles C Anunobi; Rufus W Ojewola
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2017-10-10

5.  Inflammation and preneoplastic lesions in benign prostate as risk factors for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Michelle Jankowski; Dhananjay A Chitale; Deliang Tang; Andrew Rundle; Sheri Trudeau; Benjamin A Rybicki
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Predicting prostate biopsy outcome: artificial neural networks and polychotomous regression are equivalent models.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Gina Lockwood; Peter Davies; Andy Evans; Joan Sweet; Ants Toi; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 7.  [Trends in prostate biopsy interpretation].

Authors:  J Köllermann; G Sauter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Precursor lesions to prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Molecular evidence that invasive adenocarcinoma can mimic prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and intraductal carcinoma through retrograde glandular colonization.

Authors:  Michael C Haffner; Christopher Weier; Meng Meng Xu; Ajay Vaghasia; Bora Gürel; Berrak Gümüşkaya; David M Esopi; Helen Fedor; Hsueh-Li Tan; Ibrahim Kulac; Jessica Hicks; William B Isaacs; Tamara L Lotan; William G Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Angelo M De Marzo
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 10.  Optimization of prostate biopsy: review of technique and complications.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; James S Wysock; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.