Literature DB >> 17934569

Is repeat biopsy for isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia necessary?

Arnold I Chin1, Dhiren S Dave, Jacob Rajfer.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have cited the positive predictive value of isolated highgrade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) to the detection of cancer. Epidemiological, morphological, and molecular data support the potential for malignant transformation of HGPIN, yet no current method can discriminate which lesions will progress to clinically significant prostate cancer versus more latent lesions. Recent analyses of multiple retrospective studies have found similar rates of cancer detection following either diagnosis of isolated HGPIN or an initial negative biopsy. This may reflect increased use of extended biopsy techniques involving 10 or more cores rather than the true ability of HGPIN to undergo malignant transformation. This article discusses controversies surrounding management of an isolated diagnosis of HGPIN and whether repeat biopsy of HGPIN should be mandatory or selective in the context of other predictive values such as rising prostate-specific antigen or lesion on digital rectal examination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-grade PIN; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN); Repeat biopsy

Year:  2007        PMID: 17934569      PMCID: PMC2002502     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  44 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination as screening tests for prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Kishor Mistry; Greg Cable
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr

2.  Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study.

Authors:  Joseph C Presti; Gerard J O'Dowd; M Craig Miller; Rubina Mattu; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Bcl-2 proto-oncogene expression in low- and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  S Baltaci; D Orhan; G Ozer; O Tolunay; O Gögõüs
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Predicting cancer following a diagnosis of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy: data on men with more than one follow-up biopsy.

Authors:  J D Kronz; C H Allan; A A Shaikh; J I Epstein
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Analysis of repeated biopsy results within 1 year after a noncancer diagnosis.

Authors:  G J O'dowd; M C Miller; R Orozco; R W Veltri
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Is repeat prostate biopsy for high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia necessary after routine 12-core sampling?

Authors:  G K Lefkowitz; G S Sidhu; P Torre; H Lepor; S S Taneja
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Detection of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with the five-region biopsy technique.

Authors:  C J Rosser; J Broberg; D Case; L A Eskew; D McCullough
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Genetic and chromosomal alterations in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  J Qian; R B Jenkins; D G Bostwick
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Genetic heterogeneity in a prostatic carcinoma and associated prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia as demonstrated by combined use of laser-microdissection, degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR and comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  H Zitzelsberger; U Kulka; L Lehmann; A Walch; J Smida; M Aubele; T Lörch; H Höfler; M Bauchinger; M Werner
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Followup interval prostate biopsy 3 years after diagnosis of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is associated with high likelihood of prostate cancer, independent of change in prostate specific antigen levels.

Authors:  Gary K Lefkowitz; Samir S Taneja; Jordan Brown; Jonathan Melamed; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP): Is a repeat biopsy necessary ASAP? A multi-institutional review.

Authors:  A Leone; B Gershman; K Rotker; C Butler; J Fantasia; A Miller; A Afiadata; A Amin; A Zhou; Z Jiang; T Sebo; A Mega; S Schiff; G Pareek; D Golijanin; J Yates; R J Karnes; J Renzulli
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 5.554

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.