Bengt Muthén1. 1. University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. bmuthen@ucla.edu
Abstract
AIMS: This paper discusses the representation of diagnostic criteria using categorical and dimensional statistical models. Conventional modeling using categorical or continuous latent variables in the form of latent class analysis and factor (IRT) analysis has limitations for the analysis of diagnostic criteria. METHODS: New hybrid models are discussed which provide both categorical and dimensional representations in the same model using mixture models. Conventional and new models are applied and compared using recent data for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders version IV (DSM-IV) alcohol dependence and abuse criteria from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Classification results from hybrid models are compared to the DSM-IV approach of using the number of diagnostic criteria fulfilled. RESULTS: It is found that new hybrid mixture models are more suitable than latent class and factor (IRT) models. CONCLUSIONS: Implications for DSM-V are discussed in terms of reporting results using both categories and dimensions.
AIMS: This paper discusses the representation of diagnostic criteria using categorical and dimensional statistical models. Conventional modeling using categorical or continuous latent variables in the form of latent class analysis and factor (IRT) analysis has limitations for the analysis of diagnostic criteria. METHODS: New hybrid models are discussed which provide both categorical and dimensional representations in the same model using mixture models. Conventional and new models are applied and compared using recent data for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders version IV (DSM-IV) alcohol dependence and abuse criteria from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Classification results from hybrid models are compared to the DSM-IV approach of using the number of diagnostic criteria fulfilled. RESULTS: It is found that new hybrid mixture models are more suitable than latent class and factor (IRT) models. CONCLUSIONS: Implications for DSM-V are discussed in terms of reporting results using both categories and dimensions.
Authors: Anthony O Ahmed; Gregory P Strauss; Robert W Buchanan; Brian Kirkpatrick; William T Carpenter Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Brian E Perron; Michael G Vaughn; Matthew O Howard; Amy Bohnert; Erick Guerrero Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Paul A Pilkonis; Lan Yu; Nathan E Dodds; Kelly L Johnston; Suzanne M Lawrence; Thomas F Hilton; Dennis C Daley; Ashwin A Patkar; Dennis McCarty Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Thomas S Kubarych; Kenneth S Kendler; Steven H Aggen; Ryne Estabrook; Alexis C Edwards; Shaunna L Clark; Nicholas G Martin; Ian B Hickie; Michael C Neale; Nathan A Gillespie Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 1.587
Authors: Nayana Di Giuseppe Germano; Hugo Cogo-Moreira; Fausto Coutinho-Lourenço; Graziela Bortz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 3.240