L-T Wu1, G E Woody, C Yang, J-J Pan, D G Blazer. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC 27710, USA. litzy.wu@duke.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For the emerging DSM-V, it has been recommended that dimensional and categorical methods be used simultaneously in diagnostic classification; however, little is known about this combined approach for abuse and dependence. METHOD: Using data (n=37 708) from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), DSM-IV criteria for prescription opioid abuse and dependence among non-prescribed opioid users (n=3037) were examined using factor analysis (FA), latent class analysis (LCA, categorical), item response theory (IRT, dimensional), and factor mixture (hybrid) approaches. RESULTS: A two-class factor mixture model (FMM) combining features of categorical latent classes and dimensional IRT estimates empirically fitted more parsimoniously to abuse and dependence criteria data than models from FA, LCA and IRT procedures respectively. This mixture model included a severely affected group (7%) with a comparatively moderate to high probability (0.32-0.88) of endorsing all abuse and dependence criteria items, and a less severely affected group (93%) with a low probability (0.003-0.16) of endorsing all criteria. The two empirically defined groups differed significantly in the pattern of non-prescribed opioid use, co-morbid major depression, and substance abuse treatment use. CONCLUSIONS: A factor mixture model integrating categorical and dimensional features of classification fits better to DSM-IV criteria for prescription opioid abuse and dependence in adults than a categorical or dimensional approach. Research is needed to examine the utility of this mixture classification for substance use disorders and treatment response.
BACKGROUND: For the emerging DSM-V, it has been recommended that dimensional and categorical methods be used simultaneously in diagnostic classification; however, little is known about this combined approach for abuse and dependence. METHOD: Using data (n=37 708) from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), DSM-IV criteria for prescription opioid abuse and dependence among non-prescribed opioid users (n=3037) were examined using factor analysis (FA), latent class analysis (LCA, categorical), item response theory (IRT, dimensional), and factor mixture (hybrid) approaches. RESULTS: A two-class factor mixture model (FMM) combining features of categorical latent classes and dimensional IRT estimates empirically fitted more parsimoniously to abuse and dependence criteria data than models from FA, LCA and IRT procedures respectively. This mixture model included a severely affected group (7%) with a comparatively moderate to high probability (0.32-0.88) of endorsing all abuse and dependence criteria items, and a less severely affected group (93%) with a low probability (0.003-0.16) of endorsing all criteria. The two empirically defined groups differed significantly in the pattern of non-prescribed opioid use, co-morbid major depression, and substance abuse treatment use. CONCLUSIONS: A factor mixture model integrating categorical and dimensional features of classification fits better to DSM-IV criteria for prescription opioid abuse and dependence in adults than a categorical or dimensional approach. Research is needed to examine the utility of this mixture classification for substance use disorders and treatment response.
Authors: James W Langenbucher; Erich Labouvie; Christopher S Martin; Pilar M Sanjuan; Lawrence Bavly; Levent Kirisci; Tammy Chung Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2004-02
Authors: Li-Tzy Wu; Christopher L Ringwalt; Paolo Mannelli; Ashwin A Patkar Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Li-Tzy Wu; Jeng-Jong Pan; Dan G Blazer; Betty Tai; Robert K Brooner; Maxine L Stitzer; Ashwin A Patkar; Jack D Blaine Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2009-05-06 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Li-Tzy Wu; Christopher L Ringwalt; Chongming Yang; Bryce B Reeve; Jeng-Jong Pan; Dan G Blazer Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: William S John; He Zhu; Paolo Mannelli; Geetha A Subramaniam; Robert P Schwartz; Jennifer McNeely; Li-Tzy Wu Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Porat M Erlich; Stuart N Hoffman; Margaret Rukstalis; John J Han; Xin Chu; W H Linda Kao; Glenn S Gerhard; Walter F Stewart; Joseph A Boscarino Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2010-08-20 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: João Mauricio Castaldelli-Maia; Laura H Andrade; Katherine M Keyes; Magdalena Cerdá; Daniel J Pilowsky; Silvia S Martins Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Deborah S Hasin; Charles P O'Brien; Marc Auriacombe; Guilherme Borges; Kathleen Bucholz; Alan Budney; Wilson M Compton; Thomas Crowley; Walter Ling; Nancy M Petry; Marc Schuckit; Bridget F Grant Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Sergio Sánchez-García; Carmen García-Peña; Catalina González-Forteza; Alberto Jiménez-Tapia; Joseph J Gallo; Fernando A Wagner Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Paul Crits-Christoph; Robert Gallop; Mary Beth Connolly Gibbons; Jaclyn S Sadicario; George Woody Journal: J Alcohol Drug Depend Date: 2013-03