Literature DB >> 16927175

The association between the pre-diagnosis mammography screening interval and advanced breast cancer.

Anupam Goel1, Benjamin Littenberg, Robert C Burack.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While screening has been demonstrated to reduce breast cancer mortality, the optimal screening interval is unknown. We designed a study to determine the risk of an advanced breast cancer diagnosis by varying the interval between mammograms.
METHODS: We reviewed a single state's mammography records of women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1994 and 2002. The pre-diagnosis screening interval was the number of days between the last two eligible mammograms preceding a cancer diagnosis. The interval was classified as annual (0.75-1.49 years), biennial (1.5-2.49 years) or longer (exceeding 2.49 years). Advanced breast cancer was >or=stage IIB, tumor size >2 cm, or >or=one lymph node with cancer.
RESULTS: The probability of an advanced breast cancer diagnosis did not differ between women with an annual pre-diagnosis screening interval and women with a biennial interval (21.1% vs. 23.7%, P=0.262). A longer pre-diagnosis screening interval was weakly associated with advanced breast cancer (21.8% for intervals 0.75-2.49 years vs. 26.8% for longer intervals, P=0.070). In multivariate analysis, we found an interaction between the pre-diagnosis screening interval and age. Among women 50 years or older, the risk of an advanced breast cancer diagnosis risk was higher for women with a pre-diagnosis screening interval exceeding 2.49 years compared to women with shorter screening intervals (OR 1.99 [1.02-3.90]).
CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in advanced breast cancer rates between women using mammography annually or biennially. Among women 50 years or older, the advanced breast cancer rate increased when the pre-diagnosis screening interval exceeded 2.49 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16927175      PMCID: PMC1839955          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9334-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  14 in total

1.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment.

Authors:  W A Berg; C Campassi; P Langenberg; M J Sexton
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Debbie Saslow; Kimberly Andrews Sawyer; Wylie Burke; Mary E Costanza; W Phil Evans; Roger S Foster; Edward Hendrick; Harmon J Eyre; Steven Sener
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Infiltrating ductal / lobular carcinoma: an evaluation of prognostic factors in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  E L Salazar; L Calzada; N Pedron
Journal:  Arch AIDS Res       Date:  1996

5.  Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Kathleen A Cronin; Sylvia K Plevritis; Dennis G Fryback; Lauren Clarke; Marvin Zelen; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Andrei Y Yakovlev; J Dik F Habbema; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Increased mammography use and its impact on earlier breast cancer detection in Vermont, 1975-1999.

Authors:  Pamela M Vacek; Berta M Geller; Donald L Weaver; Roger S Foster
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Mammography in 53,803 women from the New Hampshire mammography network.

Authors:  S P Poplack; A N Tosteson; M R Grove; W A Wells; P A Carney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Tumor characteristics in African American and white women.

Authors:  H Furberg; R Millikan; L Dressler; B Newman; J Geradts
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Probabilities of death from breast cancer and other causes among female breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Catherine Schairer; Pamela J Mink; Leslie Carroll; Susan S Devesa
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Changes in the 2003 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for breast cancer dramatically affect stage-specific survival.

Authors:  Wendy A Woodward; Eric A Strom; Susan L Tucker; Marsha D McNeese; George H Perkins; Naomi R Schechter; S Eva Singletary; Richard L Theriault; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Kelly K Hunt; Thomas A Buchholz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  5 in total

1.  Mammography interval and breast cancer mortality in women over the age of 75.

Authors:  Michael S Simon; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Cynthia A Thomson; Roberta M Ray; F Allan Hubbell; Lawrence Lessin; Dorothy S Lane; Lew H Kuller
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries.

Authors:  Meteb Al-Foheidi; Mubarak M Al-Mansour; Ezzeldin M Ibrahim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Weiwei Zhu; Karla Kerlikowske; Brian L Sprague; Tracy Onega; Diana S M Buist; Louise M Henderson; Robert A Smith
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Trends in incidence and detection of advanced breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in The Netherlands: a population based study.

Authors:  Joost Nederend; Lucien Em Duijm; Adri C Voogd; Johanna H Groenewoud; Frits H Jansen; Marieke Wj Louwman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Benefits and harms of annual, biennial, or triennial breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC).

Authors:  Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Margarita Posso; Nadia Montero; Ivan Solà; Zuleika Saz-Parkinson; Stephen W Duffy; Markus Follmann; Axel Gräwingholt; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 9.075

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.