BACKGROUND: Primary chemotherapy for breast cancer is effective as postoperative adjuvant therapy. However, one of the critical disadvantages was a treatment delay for patients with progressive disease. The present study attempts to clarify quantitative parameters on MRI which can be used to predict the sensitivity to treatment in breast cancer patients. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 26 patients with invasive ductal breast cancer who received primary chemotherapy before surgery. The mean maximum tumor dimension was 3.3cm, and 21 cases had nodal involvements. Three cases demonstrated histological grade 3. Dynamic enhanced MRI was evaluated at three different time periods; prior to, in the midst of preoperative chemotherapy, and just before the initial operation. The signal intensity ratio (SIR) and early contrast uptake (ECU) were calculated, as well as the correlation between these dynamic data and the tumor reduction rates were analyzed retrospectively. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant. RESULTS: Responders to chemotherapy had the significantly higher SIR and ECU values than non-responders (p=0.0454 and 0.0334, respectively). ECU value significantly decreased as tumor reduction by chemotherapy (p=0.0028). Pathological tumor dimension was significantly correlated with the tumor size estimated on presurgical MRI (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our current series demonstrated the significant correlation between pretreatment MRI data and tumor reduction by chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. With these results, it seems possible to define good and non-responders prior to treatment.
BACKGROUND: Primary chemotherapy for breast cancer is effective as postoperative adjuvant therapy. However, one of the critical disadvantages was a treatment delay for patients with progressive disease. The present study attempts to clarify quantitative parameters on MRI which can be used to predict the sensitivity to treatment in breast cancerpatients. METHODS: The subjects consisted of 26 patients with invasive ductal breast cancer who received primary chemotherapy before surgery. The mean maximum tumor dimension was 3.3cm, and 21 cases had nodal involvements. Three cases demonstrated histological grade 3. Dynamic enhanced MRI was evaluated at three different time periods; prior to, in the midst of preoperative chemotherapy, and just before the initial operation. The signal intensity ratio (SIR) and early contrast uptake (ECU) were calculated, as well as the correlation between these dynamic data and the tumor reduction rates were analyzed retrospectively. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant. RESULTS: Responders to chemotherapy had the significantly higher SIR and ECU values than non-responders (p=0.0454 and 0.0334, respectively). ECU value significantly decreased as tumor reduction by chemotherapy (p=0.0028). Pathological tumor dimension was significantly correlated with the tumor size estimated on presurgical MRI (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our current series demonstrated the significant correlation between pretreatment MRI data and tumor reduction by chemotherapy in breast cancerpatients. With these results, it seems possible to define good and non-responders prior to treatment.
Authors: Daniel I Golden; Jafi A Lipson; Melinda L Telli; James M Ford; Daniel L Rubin Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: R Prevos; M L Smidt; V C G Tjan-Heijnen; M van Goethem; R G Beets-Tan; J E Wildberger; M B I Lobbes Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-09-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jamal J Derakhshan; Elizabeth S McDonald; Evan S Siegelman; Mitchell D Schnall; Felix W Wehrli Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Xia Li; E Brian Welch; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Lei Xu; Lori R Arlinghaus; Jaime Farley; Ingrid A Mayer; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Julie Means-Powell; Vandana G Abramson; Ana M Grau; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: I Calvo-Plaza; L Ugidos; C Miró; P Quevedo; M Parras; C Márquez; J J de la Cruz; A Suárez-Gauthier; F J Pérez; M Herrero; M Marcos; M García-Aranda; M Hidalgo; L G Estévez Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Xia Li; E Brian Welch; Lori R Arlinghaus; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Lei Xu; Jaime Farley; Mary E Loveless; Ingrid A Mayer; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Julie A Means-Powell; Vandana G Abramson; Ana M Grau; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2011-08-12 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Xia Li; Benoit M Dawant; E Brian Welch; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Darla Freehardt; Ingrid Mayer; Mark Kelley; Ingrid Meszoely; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2009-06-13 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Jeon Hor Chen; Hon J Yu; Christine Hsu; Rita S Mehta; Philip M Carpenter; Min Ying Su Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 4.243