Literature DB >> 22127821

Statistical comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI pharmacokinetic models in human breast cancer.

Xia Li1, E Brian Welch, A Bapsi Chakravarthy, Lei Xu, Lori R Arlinghaus, Jaime Farley, Ingrid A Mayer, Mark C Kelley, Ingrid M Meszoely, Julie Means-Powell, Vandana G Abramson, Ana M Grau, John C Gore, Thomas E Yankeelov.   

Abstract

By fitting dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data to an appropriate pharmacokinetic model, quantitative physiological parameters can be estimated. In this study, we compare four different models by applying four statistical measures to assess their ability to describe dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data obtained in 28 human breast cancer patient sets: the chi-square test (χ(2)), Durbin-Watson statistic, Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion. The pharmacokinetic models include the fast exchange limit model with (FXL_v(p)) and without (FXL) a plasma component, and the fast and slow exchange regime models (FXR and SXR, respectively). The results show that the FXL_v(p) and FXR models yielded the smallest χ(2) in 45.64 and 47.53% of the voxels, respectively; they also had the smallest number of voxels showing serial correlation with 0.71 and 2.33%, respectively. The Akaike information criterion indicated that the FXL_v(p) and FXR models were preferred in 42.84 and 46.59% of the voxels, respectively. The Bayesian information criterion also indicated the FXL_v(p) and FXR models were preferred in 39.39 and 45.25% of the voxels, respectively. Thus, these four metrics indicate that the FXL_v(p) and the FXR models provide the most complete statistical description of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI time courses for the patients selected in this study.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22127821      PMCID: PMC3291742          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.23205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  41 in total

1.  Evidence for shutter-speed variation in CR bolus-tracking studies of human pathology.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; William D Rooney; Wei Huang; Jonathan P Dyke; Xin Li; Alina Tudorica; Jing-Huei Lee; Jason A Koutcher; Charles S Springer
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters.

Authors:  Olaf Dietrich; José G Raya; Scott B Reeder; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  The theory and applications of the exchange of inert gas at the lungs and tissues.

Authors:  S S KETY
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1951-03       Impact factor: 25.468

5.  Analysis of prostate DCE-MRI: comparison of fast exchange limit and fast exchange regimen pharmacokinetic models in the discrimination of malignant from normal tissue.

Authors:  Martin Lowry; Bashar Zelhof; Gary P Liney; Peter Gibbs; Martin D Pickles; Lindsay W Turnbull
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Jeffrey D Blume; Paul Weatherall; David Thickman; Nola Hylton; Ellen Warner; Etta Pisano; Stuart J Schnitt; Constantine Gatsonis; Mitchell Schnall; Gia A DeAngelis; Paul Stomper; Eric L Rosen; Michael O'Loughlin; Steven Harms; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Monitoring breast cancer response to neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy using parametric contrast-enhanced MRI: a pilot study.

Authors:  Chen-Pin Chou; Ming-Ting Wu; Hong-Tai Chang; Yu-Shin Lo; Huay-Ben Pan; Hadassa Degani; Edna Furman-Haran
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 8.  Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter L Choyke; Andrew J Dwyer; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Prediction of clinicopathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy at contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial clinical results.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Carmel Hayes; Laura Assersohn; Trevor Powles; Andreas Makris; John Suckling; Martin O Leach; Janet E Husband
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Simultaneous measurement of arterial input function and tumor pharmacokinetics in mice by dynamic contrast enhanced imaging: effects of transcytolemmal water exchange.

Authors:  Rong Zhou; Stephen Pickup; Thomas E Yankeelov; Charles S Springer; Jerry D Glickson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Review of treatment assessment using DCE-MRI in breast cancer radiation therapy.

Authors:  Chun-Hao Wang; Fang-Fang Yin; Janet Horton; Zheng Chang
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2014-06-26

2.  Longitudinal, intermodality registration of quantitative breast PET and MRI data acquired before and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: preliminary results.

Authors:  Nkiruka C Atuegwu; Xia Li; Lori R Arlinghaus; Richard G Abramson; Jason M Williams; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Vandana G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Towards personalized computational oncology: from spatial models of tumour spheroids, to organoids, to tissues.

Authors:  Aleksandra Karolak; Dmitry A Markov; Lisa J McCawley; Katarzyna A Rejniak
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI model selection for predicting tumor aggressiveness in papillary thyroid cancers.

Authors:  Ramesh Paudyal; Yonggang Lu; Vaios Hatzoglou; Andre Moreira; Hilda E Stambuk; Jung Hun Oh; Kristen M Cunanan; David Aramburu Nunez; Yousef Mazaheri; Mithat Gonen; Alan Ho; James A Fagin; Richard J Wong; Ashok Shaha; R Michael Tuttle; Amita Shukla-Dave
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Dynamic Contrast Enhancement (DCE) MRI-Derived Renal Perfusion and Filtration: Basic Concepts.

Authors:  Michael Pedersen; Pietro Irrera; Walter Dastrù; Frank G Zöllner; Kevin M Bennett; Scott C Beeman; G Larry Bretthorst; Joel R Garbow; Dario Livio Longo
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 6.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and tumor forecasting of breast cancer patients in the community setting.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; Anum S Kazerouni; Chengyue Wu; John Virostko; Anna G Sorace; Julie C DiCarlo; David A Hormuth; David A Ekrut; Debra Patt; Boone Goodgame; Sarah Avery; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 13.491

7.  Assessing the reproducibility of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a murine model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephanie L Barnes; Jennifer G Whisenant; Mary E Loveless; Gregory D Ayers; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Are complex DCE-MRI models supported by clinical data?

Authors:  Chong Duan; Jesper F Kallehauge; G Larry Bretthorst; Kari Tanderup; Joseph J H Ackerman; Joel R Garbow
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  DCE-MRI analysis methods for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: pilot study findings.

Authors:  Xia Li; Lori R Arlinghaus; Gregory D Ayers; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Richard G Abramson; Vandana G Abramson; Nkiruka Atuegwu; Jaime Farley; Ingrid A Mayer; Mark C Kelley; Ingrid M Meszoely; Julie Means-Powell; Ana M Grau; Melinda Sanders; Sandeep R Bhave; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Three-dimensional whole-brain perfusion quantification using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling MRI at multiple post-labeling delays: accounting for both arterial transit time and impulse response function.

Authors:  Qin Qin; Alan J Huang; Jun Hua; John E Desmond; Robert D Stevens; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.