Literature DB >> 16926071

Discounting of delayed hypothetical money and food: effects of amount.

Amy L Odum1, Ana A L Baumann, Delores D Rimington.   

Abstract

Delay discounting research determines how the value of an outcome is affected by delay to its receipt. Research so far shows that consumable outcomes are discounted more steeply by delay than money. Prior studies, however, have used large amounts of the outcomes (e.g. 100 dollars worth) that would not typically be consumed in one bout, unlike the corresponding amount of money (e.g. 100 dollars ). This experiment examined whether small amounts of food would be discounted more steeply than money, as occurs with larger amounts. One hundred and two adults indicated their preferences in a series of choices for two hypothetical outcome types: immediate versus delayed food and immediate versus delayed money. Participants made choices involving either relatively small maximum amounts of food (10 dollars worth) and money (10 dollars) or for relatively large maximum amounts of food (100 dollars worth) and money (100 dollars ). In the within-subject comparisons, food was discounted more steeply by delay than money for both groups. In the between-subject comparisons, different amounts of the commodities were affected similarly by delay. Overall, these results suggest that steeper discounting of consumable outcomes than money is a fairly robust phenomenon, occurring with relatively small amounts of outcomes as well as with larger amounts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16926071     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  50 in total

1.  Delay discounting: I'm a k, you're a k.

Authors:  Amy L Odum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Altruism in time: social temporal discounting differentiates smokers from problem drinkers.

Authors:  W K Bickel; D P Jarmolowicz; E T Mueller; C T Franck; C Carrin; K M Gatchalian
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Increased capacity to delay reward in anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Joanna E Steinglass; Bernd Figner; Staci Berkowitz; H Blair Simpson; Elke U Weber; B Timothy Walsh
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Delay discounting of food by rhesus monkeys: Cocaine and food choice in isomorphic and allomorphic situations.

Authors:  Sally L Huskinson; William L Woolverton; Leonard Green; Joel Myerson; Kevin B Freeman
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand.

Authors:  Alexandra M Mellis; Liqa N Athamneh; Jeffrey S Stein; Yan Yan Sze; Leonard H Epstein; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Cocaine dependent individuals discount future rewards more than future losses for both cocaine and monetary outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew W Johnson; Natalie R Bruner; Patrick S Johnson
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Examining Delay Discounting of Condom-Protected Sex Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Using Crowdsourcing Technology.

Authors:  Evan S Herrmann; Patrick S Johnson; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2015-09

8.  Delay discounting moderates the effect of food reinforcement on energy intake among non-obese women.

Authors:  Brandi Y Rollins; Kelly K Dearing; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  A Monte Carlo method for comparing generalized estimating equations to conventional statistical techniques for discounting data.

Authors:  Jonathan E Friedel; William B DeHart; Anne M Foreman; Michael E Andrew
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: discounting of monetary and consumable outcomes in current and non-smokers.

Authors:  Jonathan E Friedel; William B DeHart; Gregory J Madden; Amy L Odum
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.