Literature DB >> 16923822

Intron length evolution in Drosophila.

Daven C Presgraves1.   

Abstract

I present data on the evolution of intron lengths among 3 closely related Drosophila species, D. melanogaster, Drosophila simulans, and Drosophila yakuba. Using D. yakuba as an outgroup, I mapped insertion and deletion mutations in 148 introns (spanning approximately 30 kb) to the D. melanogaster and D. simulans lineages. Intron length evolution in the 2 sister species has been different: in D. melanogaster, X-linked introns have increased slightly in size, whereas autosomal ones have decreased slightly in size; in D. simulans, both X-linked and autosomal introns have decreased in size. To understand the possible evolutionary causes of these lineage- and chromosome-specific patterns of intron evolution, I studied insertion-deletion (indel) polymorphism and divergence in D. melanogaster. Small insertion mutations segregate at elevated frequencies and enjoy elevated probabilities of fixation, particularly on the X chromosome. In contrast, there is no detectable X chromosome effect on fixations in D. simulans. These findings suggest X chromosome-specific selection or biased gene conversion-gap repair favoring insertions in D. melanogaster but not in D. simulans. These chromosome- and lineage-specific patterns of indel substitution are not easily explained by existing general population genetic models of intron length evolution. Genomic data from D. melanogaster further suggest that the forces described here affect introns and intergenic regions similarly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16923822     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msl094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  19 in total

1.  Genomic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Charles H Langley; Kristian Stevens; Charis Cardeno; Yuh Chwen G Lee; Daniel R Schrider; John E Pool; Sasha A Langley; Charlyn Suarez; Russell B Corbett-Detig; Bryan Kolaczkowski; Shu Fang; Phillip M Nista; Alisha K Holloway; Andrew D Kern; Colin N Dewey; Yun S Song; Matthew W Hahn; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genome-wide identification of intron fragment insertion mutations and their potential use as SCAR molecular markers in the soybean.

Authors:  Yongjun Shu; Yong Li; Yanming Zhu; Zhenlei Zhu; Dekang Lv; Xi Bai; Hua Cai; Wei Ji; Dianjing Guo
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Stabilizing selection, purifying selection, and mutational bias in finite populations.

Authors:  Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Three independent determinants of protein evolutionary rate.

Authors:  Sun Shim Choi; Sridhar Hannenhalli
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 5.  Methods to detect selection on noncoding DNA.

Authors:  Ying Zhen; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

6.  On the utility of short intron sequences as a reference for the detection of positive and negative selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  John Parsch; Sergey Novozhilov; Sarah S Saminadin-Peter; Karen M Wong; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Population genomics: whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  David J Begun; Alisha K Holloway; Kristian Stevens; Ladeana W Hillier; Yu-Ping Poh; Matthew W Hahn; Phillip M Nista; Corbin D Jones; Andrew D Kern; Colin N Dewey; Lior Pachter; Eugene Myers; Charles H Langley
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Both size and GC-content of minimal introns are selected in human populations.

Authors:  Dapeng Wang; Jun Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Intron retention in the Drosophila melanogaster Rieske Iron Sulphur Protein gene generated a new protein.

Authors:  Alisson M Gontijo; Veronica Miguela; Michael F Whiting; R C Woodruff; Maria Dominguez
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Strong mutational bias toward deletions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome is compensated by selection.

Authors:  Evgeny V Leushkin; Georgii A Bazykin; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.