Literature DB >> 16923432

Elective versus provisional intraaortic balloon pumping in unprotected left main stenting.

Carlo Briguori1, Flavio Airoldi, Alaide Chieffo, Matteo Montorfano, Mauro Carlino, Giuseppe Massimo Sangiorgi, Nuccia Morici, Iassen Michev, Ioannis Iakovou, Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai, Antonio Colombo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elective intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) may reduce acute complications during unprotected left main (ULM) stenting. However, few data exist on criteria for elective IABP support during ULM stenting.
METHODS: Since January 1993, 219 consecutive patients underwent elective ULM stenting: 69 had elective IABP support (elective IABP group), whereas 150 patients had conventional procedure (conservative group). Criteria for elective IABP support were (1) lesion located in the distal segment of the left main (bifurcation lesion), (2) left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, (3) atherectomy, (4) unstable angina, and (5) critical disease of the right coronary artery. Incidence of intraprocedural major adverse cardiac events (eg, severe hypotension and/or shock, myocardial infarction, urgent bypass surgery, and death) was assessed.
RESULTS: Euroscore >6 (identifying high-risk patients) occurred in 38% in the elective IABP group and 13% in the conservative group (P < .001). Severe hemodynamic instability occurred in 12 patients (8%) in the conservative group and in none in the elective IABP group (P = .020). Intraprocedural major adverse cardiac event was higher in the conservative group (9.5% vs 1.5%, P = .032). Elective IABP support (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.69, P = .022) and presence of Euroscore >6 plus bifurcation lesion (OR 5.49; 95% CI 1.47-20.51; P = .011) were the independent predictors of intraprocedural events.
CONCLUSIONS: Elective IABP may prevent intraprocedural events in elective ULM stenting, especially in patients at higher risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16923432     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.02.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  12 in total

1.  Use and effectiveness of intra-aortic balloon pumps among patients undergoing high risk percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Jeptha P Curtis; Saif S Rathore; Yongfei Wang; Jersey Chen; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  Percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Seung-Jung Park; Young-Hak Kim
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2010-04-26

Review 3.  Mechanical Circulatory Support: a Comprehensive Review With a Focus on Women.

Authors:  Manal Alasnag; Alexander G Truesdell; Holli Williams; Sara C Martinez; Syeda Kashfi Qadri; John P Skendelas; William A Jakobleff; Mirvat Alasnag
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  Transbrachial intra-aortic balloon pumping for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Konstantinos Aznaouridis; Andro G Kacharava; Michelle Consolini; A Maziar Zafari; Kreton Mavromatis
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.378

Review 5.  Evidence-based treatment of unprotected left main disease: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Peter Sharis; Nicolas W Shammas
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist device in high risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Omar Kahaly; Konstantinos Dean Boudoulas
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Bhuvnesh Aggarwal; Wahaj Aman; Omar Jeroudi; Neal S Kleiman
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

8.  The Impella Recover 2.5 and TandemHeart ventricular assist devices are safe and associated with equivalent clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Jason C Kovacic; Huy T Nguyen; Rucha Karajgikar; Samin K Sharma; Annapoorna S Kini
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Percutaneous Hemodynamic Support in PCI.

Authors:  Jason Hatch; Dmitri Baklanov
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

Review 10.  Revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: an evolution in clinical decision making.

Authors:  David E Kandzari; John A Ormiston
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.