Literature DB >> 16920772

Classification of functional recovery of anterior cruciate ligament copers, non-copers, and adapters.

K Button1, R van Deursen, P Price.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: (a) To identify whether differences exist in the pattern of recovery with respect to functional outcomes for acutely ruptured anterior cruciate ligament deficient (ACLD) copers, adapters, and non-copers. (b) To identify clinically relevant outcomes that could distinguish between three functional subgroups.
METHODS: A longitudinal study was used to measure gait variables and distance hop at regular intervals after injury using a digital camcorder and computer for quantitative analysis. A sample of 63 ACLD subjects entered the study; 42 subjects were measured at least three times. At 12-36 months after injury, subjects were classified as functional copers, adapters, or non-copers on the basis of which of their preinjury activities they had resumed. To determine the pattern of recovery, repeated measurements were analysed using a least squares fit of the data.
RESULTS: 17% of ACLD subjects were classified as functional copers, 45% as adapters, and 38% as non-copers. Only 5% of those who participated in high demand activities before injury returned to them. ACLD copers had recovered above the control mean for all gait variables by 40 days after the injury. Hopping distance did not recover to the control mean. Non-copers struggled to recover to control limits and remained borderline for all the gait variables.
CONCLUSIONS: Distinctive patterns of functional recovery for three subgroups of ACLD subjects have been identified. Gait variables and activity level before injury were the most useful variables for distinguishing between the subgroups. If potential for recovery is identified early after injury, then appropriate treatment can be given.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16920772      PMCID: PMC2465054          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.028258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  35 in total

1.  Normative comparisons for the evaluation of clinical significance.

Authors:  P C Kendall; A Marrs-Garcia; S R Nath; R C Sheldrick
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1999-06

2.  Subacute versus delayed reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in the competitive athlete.

Authors:  J Karlsson; J Kartus; L Magnusson; J Larsson; S Brandsson; B I Eriksson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Dynamic stability in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee.

Authors:  K S Rudolph; M J Axe; T S Buchanan; J P Scholz; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Isolated total ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament--a clinical study with long-term follow-up of 7 years.

Authors:  M Scavenius; K Bak; S Hansen; K Nørring; K H Jensen; U Jørgensen
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Knee function after anterior cruciate ligament injury in elite collegiate athletes.

Authors:  David R McAllister; Albert M Tsai; Jason L Dragoo; Justin McWilliams; Frederick J Dorey; Sharon L Hame; Gerald A M Finerman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Soccer after anterior cruciate ligament injury--an incompatible combination? A national survey of incidence and risk factors and a 7-year follow-up of 310 players.

Authors:  H Roos; M Ornell; P Gärdsell; L S Lohmander; A Lindstrand
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1995-04

7.  Non-operative treatment of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament in middle-aged patients. Results after long-term follow-up.

Authors:  M G Ciccotti; S J Lombardo; B Nonweiler; M Pink
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Assessing anterior cruciate ligament injuries: the association and differential value of questionnaires, clinical tests, and functional tests.

Authors:  T B Neeb; G Aufdemkampe; J H Wagener; L Mastenbroek
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  The effect of a geographic lateral bone bruise on knee inflammation after acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  D L Johnson; D P Bealle; J C Brand; J Nyland; D N Caborn
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers.

Authors:  M E Eastlack; M J Axe; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Yonatan Kaplan; Joanna Kvist; Grethe Myklebust; May Arna Risberg; Daniel Theisen; Elias Tsepis; Suzanne Werner; Barbara Wondrasch; Erik Witvrouw
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Different knee joint loading patterns in ACL deficient copers and non-copers during walking.

Authors:  Tine Alkjær; Marius Henriksen; Erik B Simonsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Performance-based functional outcome for children 12 years or younger following anterior cruciate ligament injury: a two to nine-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Håvard Moksnes; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  A 10-year prospective trial of a patient management algorithm and screening examination for highly active individuals with anterior cruciate ligament injury: Part 1, outcomes.

Authors:  Wendy J Hurd; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Individuals with an anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee classified as noncopers may be candidates for nonsurgical rehabilitation.

Authors:  Håvard Moksnes; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Alterations of kinetic characteristics in step up and over test in patients with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  Hsiu-Chen Lin; Horng-Chaung Hsu; Chia-Ming Chang; Pei-Wen Chiou; Tung-Wu Lu
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Activity progression for anterior cruciate ligament injured individuals.

Authors:  Kate Button; Paulien E Roos; Robert W M van Deursen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Brain Response to a Knee Proprioception Task Among Persons With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Controls.

Authors:  Andrew Strong; Helena Grip; Carl-Johan Boraxbekk; Jonas Selling; Charlotte K Häger
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Altered biomechanical strategies and medio-lateral control of the knee represent incomplete recovery of individuals with injury during single leg hop.

Authors:  Paulien E Roos; Kate Button; Valerie Sparkes; Robert W M van Deursen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.712

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.