Literature DB >> 18979658

Individuals with an anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee classified as noncopers may be candidates for nonsurgical rehabilitation.

Håvard Moksnes1, Lynn Snyder-Mackler, May Arna Risberg.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVES: First, to classify a group of individuals with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knee as potential copers or potential noncopers, based on an established screening examination. Second, to prospectively follow a cohort of individuals with an ACL injury and characterize the nonoperatively treated subjects as true copers and true noncopers 1 year after injury, and evaluate the outcomes in operatively treated individuals 1 year after ACL reconstruction. Finally, to calculate the predictive value of the screening examination based on a 1-year follow-up of the group of subjects with ACL tears treated nonoperatively.
BACKGROUND: A screening examination has been developed for early classification of individuals with ACL injuries. Potential copers have successfully been identified as rehabilitation candidates and have shown that they are able to continue preinjury activities without ACL reconstruction (true copers). However, the potential of individuals identified as noncopers to become true copers has not been studied. METHODS AND MEASURES: One hundred and twenty-five subjects with ACL injury were evaluated using a screening examination consisting of 4 single-legged hop tests, the Knee Outcome Survey activities of daily living scale, the global rating of knee function, and the numbers of episodes of giving way. Knee laxity measurements, the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form (IKDC2000), and return to sport were included as outcome measurements.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent (n = 46) of the subjects with ACL injury were classified as potential copers at the screening examination. Of the 102 subjects examined at follow-up, 51% (n = 52) had undergone nonoperative treatment. Sixty-five percent (n = 34) of the nonoperated subjects were classified as true copers at the 1 year follow-up. Among the potential copers, 60% were true copers, while 70% of the subjects initially classified as potential noncopers were true copers at the 1 year follow-up. The positive predictive value for correctly classifying true copers at the screening examination was 60% (95% confidence interval: 41%-78%), while the negative predictive value was 30% (95% confidence interval: 16%-49%).
CONCLUSION: A majority (70%) of subjects classified as potential noncopers were true copers after 1 year of nonoperative treatment. Individuals with nonoperative treatment and ACL reconstruction showed excellent knee function and were highly active at the 1 year follow-up. The prognostic accuracy of this screening examination for correctly classifying true copers was poor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18979658      PMCID: PMC2801138          DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  45 in total

1.  Ability of a new hop test to determine functional deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jesper Augustsson; Roland Thomeé; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-05-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: a prospective study.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford; Robert S Heidt; Angelo J Colosimo; Scott G McLean; Antonie J van den Bogert; Mark V Paterno; Paul Succop
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, part I.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Joseph A Abate; Braden C Fleming; Claude E Nichols
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Altered knee kinematics in ACL-deficient non-copers: a comparison using dynamic MRI.

Authors:  Peter J Barrance; Glenn N Williams; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Knee and hip angle and moment adaptations during cutting tasks in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency classified as noncopers.

Authors:  Jeff R Houck; Andrew Duncan; Kenneth E De Haven
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Perturbation training improves knee kinematics and reduces muscle co-contraction after complete unilateral anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  Terese L Chmielewski; Wendy J Hurd; Katherine S Rudolph; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-08

7.  The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: normative data.

Authors:  Allen F Anderson; James J Irrgang; Mininder S Kocher; Barton J Mann; John J Harrast
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  The symptomatic anterior cruciate-deficient knee. Part II: the results of rehabilitation, activity modification, and counseling on functional disability.

Authors:  F R Noyes; D S Matthews; P A Mooar; E S Grood
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Subjective functional assessments and the return to competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  F W Smith; E A Rosenlund; A K Aune; J A MacLean; S W Hillis
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament injury: current recommendations for sports participation.

Authors:  Joanna Kvist
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

View more
  38 in total

1.  The effects of neuromuscular training on the gait patterns of ACL-deficient men and women.

Authors:  Stephanie L Di Stasi; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 2.  Neuromuscular training to target deficits associated with second anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Stephanie Di Stasi; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Reliability and validity of observational risk screening in evaluating dynamic knee valgus.

Authors:  Christina L Ekegren; William C Miller; Richard G Celebrini; Janice J Eng; Donna L Macintyre
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Simple decision rules can reduce reinjury risk by 84% after ACL reconstruction: the Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Håvard Moksnes; Lars Engebretsen; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction: noncopers versus potential copers.

Authors:  Erin H Hartigan; Andrew D Lynch; David S Logerstedt; Terese L Chmielewski; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 6.  Tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis After Surgical or Nonsurgical Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kyle P Harris; Jeffrey B Driban; Michael R Sitler; Nicole M Cattano; Easwaran Balasubramanian; Jennifer M Hootman
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 7.  Controversies in knee rehabilitation: anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Mathew J Failla; Amelia J H Arundale; David S Logerstedt; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.182

8.  The effect of knee extensor open kinetic chain resistance training in the ACL-injured knee.

Authors:  Massimo G Barcellona; Matthew C Morrissey; Peter Milligan; Melissa Clinton; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Increased lateral tibial slope predicts high-grade rotatory knee laxity pre-operatively in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Ata A Rahnemai-Azar; Ermias S Abebe; Paul Johnson; Joseph Labrum; Freddie H Fu; James J Irrgang; Kristian Samuelsson; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Altered loading in the injured knee after ACL rupture.

Authors:  Emily S Gardinier; Kurt Manal; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.