Literature DB >> 16918972

Histopathological characteristics of metastasizing squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and lips.

P J F Quaedvlieg1, D H K V Creytens, G G Epping, C J Peutz-Kootstra, F H M Nieman, M R T M Thissen, G A Krekels.   

Abstract

AIMS: The reported incidence of metastasis from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin and lip varies between 0.5% and 16%. Clinical and histopathological criteria have been proposed to identify tumours that may have an increased risk of metastasis. The aim of this study was to define such high-risk tumours, especially since the incidence of SCC of the skin is increasing. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Histopathological features of metastasized skin and lip tumours and a matched group of non-metastasizing tumours were reassessed. Characteristics studied were: tumour width, excision margins, histological subtype, Clark level, Breslow depth, tumour differentiation, inflammation, perineural and angio-invasive growth, ulceration and desmoplasia. Data were statistically analysed separately for skin and labial lesions. Desmoplasia, Clark level, Breslow depth, maximum diameter, angio-invasion, grading, perineural invasion, plasma cells and eosinophilic inflammatory response proved to be statistically significantly related to metastasis of skin tumours. Breslow depth, plasma cells and grading appeared to be statistically significantly related to metastasis of SCC of the lips.
CONCLUSIONS: A typical metastatic SCC showed: a tumour width of at least 15 mm, a vertical tumour thickness (=Breslow) of at least 2 mm, less differentiation, presence of desmoplasia and an inflammatory response with eosinophils and plasma cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16918972      PMCID: PMC1619204          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02472.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


Introduction

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin is the second most frequent malignant tumour in the head and neck region and is associated with an appreciable rate of metastasis (0.5–16%).1–10 The registration of SCCs is inadequate; many patients are treated in private practice and excised tumours sometimes have no histological verification. The potential for metastatic disease with SCC of the skin is often under-emphasized, especially among dermatologists who frequently handle malignant degeneration of actinic lesions. The potential for metastasis may also be underestimated because patients presenting with tumour in a lymph node may not associate such metastasis with a skin cancer treated several years previously. At present, it is unpredictable whether a SCC will metastasize or not. The clinical classification of SCC, as established primarily by the International Union against Cancer (UICC), does not allow an optimal estimation of metastatic risk. The TNM (Tumor Node Metastases) staging system has proved satisfactory for many malignant tumours, but is not reliable for assessment of the metastatic potential of skin SCC; clinical experience shows that even small carcinomas can metastasize. The question therefore arises which additional prognostic factors,11 such as anatomical site, histological features, aetiology, host immunosuppression and prior treatment, are indicative of the metastatic risk of a tumour.12–14 Petter, Haustein and Breuniger,12–17 found that tumour size, Clark level, Breslow depth, mitotic index, ulceration, blood vessel invasion, lymphatic invasion, tumour-associated tissue eosinophilia and desmoplasia are related to metastasis. In our study we investigated what proportion of SCCs metastasize and if histopathological features can be identified to predict metastatic potential. The prevalence of metastasis was determined for two locations of the tumour, the lips and other locations within the skin, because SCC of the lip shows a higher risk of metastasis.8

Materials and methods

The PALGA registry system (a national registry system of all histopathological specimens in the Netherlands) was used to obtain the records of all registered SCCs of the skin and metastases in the University Hospital of Maastricht in the period between 1982 and 2002. All available tissue sections of the tumours that metastasized were compared with a control group of non-metastasizing tumours. Both groups were reassessed by both dermatologist and dermatopathologist for histopathological characteristics. We matched tumours for the following factors: gender, primary or recurrent lesion, use of immunosuppression, location of the lesion, prior therapy and the length of the follow-up period. Recurrent lesions were defined as lesions with the same histology that showed complete clinical response to treatment, but reappeared at the same site. Information regarding immune status was obtained from electronic patient files. The follow-up period was defined as the time from the diagnosis to the beginning of our study (January 2003). To diminish the possibility of missing metastases in the matched group, we used matched cases with a follow-up of at least 3 years because SCC tumours usually metastasize after 3 years or longer. The primary outcome variable of this study was metastasis, scored as 0 (absent) or 1 (present). The tumour characteristics assumed to be related to metastasis based on previous studies were: tumour width, excision margins, histological subtype, Clark's depth, Breslow depth, tumour differentiation, inflammatory cell invasion (lymphocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils, histiocytes, plasma cells), perineural and angio-invasion, ulceration and desmoplasia. The tumour width was taken from the histology reports and patient files. In most cases the exact tumour size was recorded in these reports. In some cases, however, no size was mentioned. In those cases the maximum size of the skin excision was used corrected for the tumour-free margin. When there was no reporting of margins, we assumed that there was a clinical tumour-free margin of 5 mm, which is the clinical standard in our hospital. Excision margins were stated free with wide margins, i.e. > 2 mm (1), involved (2) or free with narrow margins (3). Bracketed numbers represent the score given to the respective parameters. The SCC was subtyped as being a regular horn forming SCC (1) or one of the less common forms of SCC, being: acantholytic SCC (2), spindle cell SCC (3), basosquamous SCC (4) desmoplastic SCC (5) or verrucous SCC (6). Clark's depth was scored according to the anatomical invasiveness, based on Clark's scoring system. The most invasive point was measured. Breslow depth was measured from the granular layer of the skin to the deepest point with an accuracy of 0.1 mm. Tumour differentiation was classified into well (1), moderately (2) or poorly (3) differentiated. Grading was based on cellular pleomorphism and (de)squamation. The inflammation (lymphocytes, histiocytes, eosinophils, neutrophils, plasma cells) in the tissue was subtyped and scored dichotomously. No or limited invasion with inflammatory cells was scored as 0, moderate and major invasion was scored 1. Perineural invasion and angio-invasion were scored after staining. Slides were stained for perineural invasion using staining for pankeratins (MNF-116) and S100 antigen. Angio-invasion was identified using immunohistochemistry for CD31. Invasion was recorded as either absent (0) or present (1). Ulceration and desmoplastic stromal reaction were graded using the same two-point scale as for inflammatory cell infiltrate.

Statistics

Data were analysed separately for skin and lip tumours. In both analyses, having or not having a metastasis was considered to be the outcome variable. If metric variables (or variates) appeared to be non-normally distributed and were regarded as an outcome variable, an attempt was made to normalize their distribution by transforming them by logarithms (based on 10). Student's t-test was also performed. Tumour characteristics considered to be relevant for prediction of the prevalence of metastasis consisted of a set of two continuous variables and 13 discrete classifications. First, log-likelihood χ2 and odds ratios [with 95% confidence intervals (CIs)] were calculated for each separate risk (or protective) variable or factor. For this purpose continuous variables were also dichotomized on their median value. Next, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out using the backward elimination log-likelihood χ2 technique with all relevant variables and factors. The result of this search technique for the best fitting model is presented as a reduced logistic regression model containing only statistically significant predictors. Net-effect odds ratios (and 95% CIs) of this eventual model are presented in Table 1. A P-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All data analysis was performed with SPSS-pc version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Table 1a

Skin histopathological characteristics of the skin related to metastasis (n = 110)

n%META'SX2LPORLowerUppern
Grading141512.481.035.94
241512.481.035.94
3228614.933.858.68
Clark*119051.38<0.001
21195.570.21149.16
3284633.951.87617.08
4277089.484.831659.05
52186206.239.954268.42
RClark1 + 2 + 3582432.65<0.001106
427707.462.6920.74
5218618.864.8373.63
Max diam≤15512426.97<0.0019.253.7422.85101
>155074
Breslow≤2.85451342.90<0.00125.288.1778.2089
>2.854480
Perineural invasion0644514.97<0.0018.8512.4132.5789
12588
Angio-invasion0624222.89<0.00117.313.7679.6289
12793
Lymphocytes095536.980.010.160.340.78108
11315
Histiocytes076460.450.501.330.583.04108
13253
Eosinophils082426.20.0133.181.248.15108
12669
Neutrophils0102490.570.450.520.912.97108
1633
Plasma cells075399.000.0033.651.528.76108
13370
Infiltration096525.840.160.160.040.89108
11217
Ulceration087432.830.092.480.847.31104
11765
Desmoplasia0662147.09<0.00129.718.9998.19102
13689
Margins185533.760.15109
215400.590.191.81
39220.250.051.29

½ added to frequencies.

OR + odds ratio.

log likelihood χ2.

%META'S, %metastasis.

Skin histopathological characteristics of the skin related to metastasis (n = 110) ½ added to frequencies. OR + odds ratio. log likelihood χ2. %META'S, %metastasis.

Results

During the period 1982–2002, 915 SCCs of the skin (n = 852) and lip (n = 63) in 580 patients were found; 68 of these 915 tumours (7.4%) in 580 patients (11.72%) did metastasize. The prevalence of metastasis for lip SCC alone was 20.6% (13/63) and for skin tumours 6.5% (55/852). For both tumour locations 27% patients were women and 73% were men. The mean age among women was 79 years and 82 years for men. The mean follow-up was 5.7 years (0.25–21 years). In the total group three patients were immunosuppressed and seven had a recurrent lesion. Of the 68 metastases, 13 cases (19.1%) were on the lip and 37 (54.4%) were in the head and neck region. Nineteen (28%) of the metastases were located in the locoregional lymph nodes, mostly ipsilateral.

Skin tumours (n = 110)

In the group of skin tumours 55 cases were compared with 55 controls. In the metastatic group of skin SCCs desmoplasia, Clark level (Figure 1), Breslow depth and maximum diameter, angio-invasion, grading, perineural invasion (Figure 2), plasma cells and eosinophils (Figure 3) proved to be statistically significantly related to metastasis. Table 1a lists the results of the histopathological characteristics of the skin tumour which metastasized.
Figure 1

Clark level.

Figure 2

Perineural invasion.

Figure 3

Plasma cells and eosinophils.

Clark level. Perineural invasion. Plasma cells and eosinophils. In the multivariate analysis of skin SCC metastasis the eventual model found contains three risk factors and one protecting factor. In order of statistical importance the risk factors comprise: the maximum diameter of the tumour (in mm), having or not having tumour desmoplasia (Figures 5 and 6) and the reclassified, trichotomous Clark index. Finally, the only protective factor was found to be having or not having a lymphocytic infiltrate. Grade of differentiation was found to be the only remaining risk factor that was almost statistically significant (overall P-value of backward elimination χ2 was 0.083).
Figure 5

Desmoplasia.

Figure 6

Desmoplasia.

Plasma cells. Desmoplasia. Desmoplasia.

Lip tumours (n = 63)

In the group of lip tumours 13 cases were combined with 50 controls. In the group of lip SCCs, Breslow, plasma cells (Figure 4) and grading appeared to be statistically significant prognostic factors for metastasis. Table 1b lists the histopathological characteristics of the tumours of the lips. Of the tumours with Breslow thickness > 4.8 mm, 53% metastasized compared with 0% of SCCs < 4.8 mm. Breslow thickness was a statistically significant prognostic factor for metastasis [odds ratio (OR) = 3.71, P < 0.001].
Figure 4

Plasma cells.

Table 1b

Histopathological characteristics of the lips related to metastasis (n = 63)

n%META'SX2LPORLowerUppern
Grading12776.970.03
227223.570.6519.5962
385012.501.6992.25
Max. diameter≤1528180.640.421.700.466.2154
>152627
Breslow≤4.819016.89<0.0013.71*0.776.6537
>4.81853
Perineural invasion045182.130.153.080.7013.5255
11040
Angio-invasion053210.800.373.820.2266.0255
1250
Lymphocytes056210.010.940.920.098.9861
1520
Histiocytes037190.320.571.430.424.9261
12425
Eosinophils054220.250.620.580.645.3361
1714
Neutrophils057210.330.861.250.1213.1261
1425
Plasma cells051148.950.019.432.1242.0761
11060
Infiltrationj050200.270.601.50.346.7061
11127
Ulceration044182.150.142.80.7310.9057
11339
Desmoplasia035230.010.941.060.293.7856
12121

½ added to frequencies.

OR + odds ratio.

log likelihood χ2.

%META'S, %metastasis.

Histopathological characteristics of the lips related to metastasis (n = 63) ½ added to frequencies. OR + odds ratio. log likelihood χ2. %META'S, %metastasis. The multivariate analysis of lip SCC with metastasis showed that only one risk factor turned out to have a significant OR for metastasis, namely having or not having an infiltrate of plasma cells.

Discussion

SCC of the skin is a potentially lethal form of skin cancer, responsible for 20% of all cutaneous malignancies. The incidence of metastasis from skin and lip SCCs varies between 0.5% and 16%.18 Some patients are known to die of local invasion of the tumour or metastases and these cases are difficult to detect in retrospective studies. Clinical and histopathological criteria have been proposed to identify tumours that may have an increased risk of metastasis. Patients with metastatic disease have a poor prognosis, with 10-year survival rates of < 20%. It is therefore important to define high-risk tumours and treat these tumours aggressively with large excision margins and/or adjuvant radiotherapy, especially since the incidence of SCC of the skin is increasing. In our study we examined histopathological features that might predict the metastatic potential of SCCs of the skin and lip. To gain a better appreciation of histopathological parameters important in the development of metastases, we matched all cases. In our study we matched for the following factors: gender, primary or recurrent lesion, immunosuppression, location of the lesion, the therapy used and the length of follow-up. We realize that our study is retrospective and that for some characteristics relatively large numbers of values were missing. The group of patients with metastasis was small, so the statistical analysis of these results met with some difficulties. Future prospective studies should therefore be very large to interpret outcomes. The study found that 68 of 915 tumours in 580 patients had metastasized. The rate of metastases was therefore 11.7% for the patients and 7.4% for the tumours. Males seem to have a higher incidence of metatastatic disease compared with women, even taking into account the larger numbers of SCCs in men.19 This was also found in our study. A review of the literature from 1940 until 1992 revealed that recurrent SCC has a significantly higher metastatic rate than primary SCC. For recurrent tumours there was a metastatic rate of 25% for skin SCC, a rate of 45% for ear SCC and a rate of > 30% for the lip. We found three (4.4%) recurrent lesions in the metastatic group.11 The effect of immunosuppression has been studied extensively, mostly because of the growing number of transplant recipients. It is not certain whether the higher number of metastatic lesions in an immunosuppressed patient is due to the more aggressive nature of every single SCC or the presence of multiple typical SCCs often seen in transplantation patients.20–23 In the group with metastasis studied, only one (1.5%) of the patients was immunosuppressed. Tumour width, defined as the maximum diameter of the lesion, is an important prognostic factor for the metastatic potential of SCC. Significant correlation of tumour size with metastasis has been found in a number of reports.8,11,12,15,16,18,24 We also found tumour width to be significantly associated with metastatic potential. A size of ≥ 20 mm triples the risk of metastasis compared with lesions < 20 mm.11,15,25 In a German study, 78% of metastasizing tumours were > 20 mm.13 In our study 50% of the metastasized tumours were at least 15 mm in diameter. However, this does not mean smaller tumours are not capable of metastasis. In one study none of 14 metastasizing periauricular tumours was larger than 2 cm.12–13 This suggests that other prognostic factors should also be taken into account. Excision margins might also be important. Our results show that margins of < 2 mm are insufficient. This is in line with another study, which showed a cumulative tumour clearance of only 78% with 2-mm margins.25 This is far less than the 96% with 4-mm margins. Margins of 2 mm seemed to be insufficient in wider and less differentiated tumours.25 The depth of tumour invasion can be expressed according to Clark, or according to Breslow. Clark's classification is more widely used in the setting of SCC of the skin. As in our study, earlier studies point to the worse prognosis of deeper tumours.11,12,15,16,26–28 Some studies have found metastases only when there was invasion of subcutaneous tissue. This was not the case in our population, although the tumours were at least Clark II. Breuniger and colleagues found a metastatic rate of < 1% when only the dermis was invaded, a rate of > 4% with invasion of the subcutaneous fat and a rate of > 12% when deeper tissue was invaded. Measuring Breslow depth (vertical tumour thickness) is a more time-consuming way of expressing tumour depth. In our study all metastatic ‘pure’ skin tumours were > 2.85 mm thick. SCC of the skin of < 2.85 mm probably does not metastasize at all.12,15–17,24,26,28–30 In our study, measurements of tumour differentiation were based on cellular polymorphism and (de)squamation. Both are significantly associated with metastatic potential according to Petter and Haustein.12 Like most studies, we did not differentiate the histological grading further with regard to these separate factors. A significant relationship between differentiation and metastases has often been found, although some studies could not establish such a relationship.1,14,19,24,29,31,32 Our results confirm it and endorse the importance of tumour differentiation. Ulceration, histiocytic inflammation and neutrophilic inflammation were not related to metastasis in our patients. Some previous studies are in agreement with our own8,18,24,30,33,34 but other studies have reported that these factors are related to metastases.11,12,16,32 The incidence of perineural invasion in SCC is reported to be 3.7%.11 Lesions with perineural invasion have a significantly higher risk of metastatic disease. Metastases in neurotropic skin SCC occur in 5.9–34.8%, depending on treatment regimen. In our study perineural invasion also seems to be an important factor in skin metastasis. Lip SCC has an even worse prognosis when neurotropism is present, with reported metastatic rates of 60–80%. We did not confirm this in our study. Angio-invasion is, to our knowledge, a factor less extensively investigated.30 Our results have shown a statistically significant relationship with metastasis in this respect. Desmoplastic SCC has been defined as a SCC with fine, diffusely infiltrating branches of tumour cells at the periphery, surrounded by a strong fibrotic stromal reaction. Desmoplastic SCC frequently metastasizes.12,16,23 We did find many tumours that matched the criteria for desmoplastic SCC. However, we saw at least a little desmoplasia in every metastasizing tumour. Based on the results of our study, desmoplasia might therefore be regarded as an important factor in SCC of the skin.

Conclusion

A typical metastatic SCC showed: a tumour width of at least 15 mm, a vertical tumour thickness of at least 2 mm and at least Clark II, less differentiation, presence of desmoplasia and invasion with eosinophils and plasma cells. The next step will be to establish a prospective study with a follow-up of at least 3 years, in order to establish a risk profile of SCC of the skin, based on histopathological tumour characteristics.
  31 in total

1.  The frequency and risk of metastases in squamous-cell carcinoma of the skin.

Authors:  A D KATZ; F URBACH; A M LILIENFELD
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1957 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Desmoplastic squamous cell carcinoma of skin and vermilion surface: a highly malignant subtype of skin cancer.

Authors:  H Breuninger; G Schaumburg-Lever; J Holzschuh; H P Horny
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The prognosis of patients with basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.

Authors:  D Czarnecki
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.736

Review 4.  Histopathology of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  B Maguire; N P Smith
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.541

5.  Regional lymph node metastasis from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  D H Kraus; J F Carew; L B Harrison
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-05

Review 6.  Squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  R Marks
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-03-16       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  [Histological and clinical prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. A contribution to the multicenter carcinoma study of the association of surgical and oncological dermatology].

Authors:  G Petter; U F Haustein
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 0.751

8.  Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin--histopathological features and their significance for the clinical outcome.

Authors:  G Petter; U F Haustein
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.166

9.  Analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  A C Haeffner; K Zepter; C A Elmets; G S Wood
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1997-05

10.  Metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the skin in southern Australia.

Authors:  D Czarnecki; M Staples; A Mar; G Giles; C Meehan
Journal:  Dermatology       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.366

View more
  13 in total

1.  Acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma is usually associated with hair follicles, not acantholytic actinic keratosis, and is not "high risk": Diagnosis, management, and clinical outcomes in a series of 115 cases.

Authors:  Toru Ogawa; Maija Kiuru; Thomas H Konia; Maxwell A Fung
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  A new American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: creation and rationale for inclusion of tumor (T) characteristics.

Authors:  Sharifeh Farasat; Siegrid S Yu; Victor A Neel; Kishwer S Nehal; Thomas Lardaro; Martin C Mihm; David R Byrd; Charles M Balch; Joseph A Califano; Alice Y Chuang; William H Sharfman; Jatin P Shah; Paul Nghiem; Clark C Otley; Anthony P Tufaro; Timothy M Johnson; Arthur J Sober; Nanette J Liégeois
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Pancreatobiliary Maljunction-associated Gallbladder Cancer Is as Common in the West, Shows Distinct Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Offers an Invaluable Model for Anatomy-induced Reflux-associated Physio-chemical Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Takashi Muraki; Burcin Pehlivanoglu; Bahar Memis; Michelle D Reid; Takeshi Uehara; Olca Basturk; Jennifer Golia Pernicka; David S Klimstra; William R Jarnagin; Tetsuya Ito; Osamu Hasebe; Shinji Okaniwa; Naoto Horigome; Takeshi Hisa; Pardeep Mittal; Juan M Sarmiento; Shishir K Maithel; Jill Koshiol; Susan Tsai; Douglas Evans; Mert Erkan; Volkan Adsay
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 13.787

4.  Quantitative Evaluation of Tumour--Associated Tissue Eosinophilia and Cyclo-oxegenase-2 Gene in Oral Cancer Patients with Assessment of Long Term Outcomes.

Authors:  N Rakesh; Asha Iyengar; Kuhu Majumdar; G S Vidya; S S Shantha Kumar
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Focus Issue on Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Practical Concerns Regarding the 7th Edition AJCC Staging Guidelines.

Authors:  D Buethe; C Warner; J Miedler; C J Cockerell
Journal:  J Skin Cancer       Date:  2010-11-22

Review 6.  High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Clinical Review.

Authors:  Flora Yan; Brittny N Tillman; Rajiv I Nijhawan; Divya Srivastava; David J Sher; Vladimir Avkshtol; Jade Homsi; Justin A Bishop; Erin M Wynings; Rebecca Lee; Larry L Myers; Andrew T Day
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Risk Factors for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Recurrence, Metastasis, and Disease-Specific Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Agnieszka K Thompson; Benjamin F Kelley; Larry J Prokop; M Hassan Murad; Christian L Baum
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 10.282

8.  Molecular markers in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Anthony P Tufaro; Jim C-M Chuang; Nijaguna Prasad; Alice Chuang; Tony C Chuang; Anne C Fischer
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-09

9.  Tumour associated tissue eosinophilia as a predictor of locoregional recurrence in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Nagaraju Rakesh; Yashoda Devi; Kuhu Majumdar; Sujatha S Reddy; Kunal Agarwal
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-02-01

10.  Eosinophils and oral squamous cell carcinoma: a short review.

Authors:  C P Martinelli-Kläy; B R R N Mendis; T Lombardi
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.