Agnieszka K Thompson1, Benjamin F Kelley1, Larry J Prokop2, M Hassan Murad3, Christian L Baum1. 1. Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 2. Mayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Division of Preventive, Occupational, and Aerospace Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota4Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: To date, the magnitude of association and the quality of evidence for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and risk factors for outcomes have not been reviewed and analyzed systematically. OBJECTIVE: To systematically analyze all published data on risk factors for recurrence, metastasis, and disease-specific death (DSD) of cSCC. DATA SOURCES: Comprehensive search of Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus, from each database's inception to May 14, 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were studies of at least 10 patients, comparative data for at least 1 cSCC risk factor, and an outcome of interest. Exclusion criteria were noncutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), anogenital SCC, inability to extract cSCC data from other malignancy data, SCC in situ, Marjolin ulcer, and genetic disorders predisposing to cSCC. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently abstracted the data. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A priori outcomes were recurrence, metastasis, and DSD. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies (17 248 patients with 23 421 cSCCs) were included. Significant risk factors for recurrence were the following: Breslow thickness exceeding 2 mm (risk ratio [RR], 9.64; 95% CI, 1.30-71.52), invasion beyond subcutaneous fat (RR, 7.61; 95% CI, 4.17-13.88), Breslow thickness exceeding 6 mm (RR, 7.13; 95% CI, 3.04-16.72), perineural invasion (RR, 4.30; 95% CI, 2.80-6.60), diameter exceeding 20 mm (RR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.91-5.45), location on the temple (RR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.12-9.15), and poor differentiation (RR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.72-4.14). Significant risk factors for metastasis were: invasion beyond subcutaneous fat (RR, 11.21; 95% CI, 3.59-34.97), Breslow thickness exceeding 2 mm (RR, 10.76; 95% CI, 2.55-45.31), Breslow thickness exceeding 6 mm (RR, 6.93; 95% CI, 4.02-11.94), diameter exceeding 20 mm (RR, 6.15; 95% CI, 3.56-10.65), poor differentiation (RR, 4.98; 95% CI, 3.30-7.49), perineural invasion (RR, 2.95; 95% CI, 2.31-3.75), immunosuppression (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.07-2.37), and location on the temple (RR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.72-4.63), ear (RR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.67-3.23), or lip (RR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.54-3.37). Significant risk factors for DSD were: diameter exceeding 20 mm (RR, 19.10; 95% CI, 5.80-62.95), poor differentiation (RR, 5.65; 95% CI, 1.76-18.20), location on the ear (RR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.28-17.12) or lip (RR, 4.55; 95% CI, 1.41-14.69), invasion beyond subcutaneous fat (RR, 4.49; 95% CI, 2.05-9.82), and perineural invasion (RR, 4.06; 95% CI, 3.10-5.32). Evidence quality was considered low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Tumor depth is associated with the highest RR of local recurrence and metastasis of cSCC, and tumor diameter exceeding 20 mm is associated with the highest RR of DSD. Unified, consistent collection and reporting of risk factors in a prospective, multicentered effort are needed to further understand the increasing incidence of cSCC.
IMPORTANCE: To date, the magnitude of association and the quality of evidence for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and risk factors for outcomes have not been reviewed and analyzed systematically. OBJECTIVE: To systematically analyze all published data on risk factors for recurrence, metastasis, and disease-specific death (DSD) of cSCC. DATA SOURCES: Comprehensive search of Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus, from each database's inception to May 14, 2015. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were studies of at least 10 patients, comparative data for at least 1 cSCC risk factor, and an outcome of interest. Exclusion criteria were noncutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), anogenital SCC, inability to extract cSCC data from other malignancy data, SCC in situ, Marjolin ulcer, and genetic disorders predisposing to cSCC. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently abstracted the data. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A priori outcomes were recurrence, metastasis, and DSD. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies (17 248 patients with 23 421 cSCCs) were included. Significant risk factors for recurrence were the following: Breslow thickness exceeding 2 mm (risk ratio [RR], 9.64; 95% CI, 1.30-71.52), invasion beyond subcutaneous fat (RR, 7.61; 95% CI, 4.17-13.88), Breslow thickness exceeding 6 mm (RR, 7.13; 95% CI, 3.04-16.72), perineural invasion (RR, 4.30; 95% CI, 2.80-6.60), diameter exceeding 20 mm (RR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.91-5.45), location on the temple (RR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.12-9.15), and poor differentiation (RR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.72-4.14). Significant risk factors for metastasis were: invasion beyond subcutaneous fat (RR, 11.21; 95% CI, 3.59-34.97), Breslow thickness exceeding 2 mm (RR, 10.76; 95% CI, 2.55-45.31), Breslow thickness exceeding 6 mm (RR, 6.93; 95% CI, 4.02-11.94), diameter exceeding 20 mm (RR, 6.15; 95% CI, 3.56-10.65), poor differentiation (RR, 4.98; 95% CI, 3.30-7.49), perineural invasion (RR, 2.95; 95% CI, 2.31-3.75), immunosuppression (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.07-2.37), and location on the temple (RR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.72-4.63), ear (RR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.67-3.23), or lip (RR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.54-3.37). Significant risk factors for DSD were: diameter exceeding 20 mm (RR, 19.10; 95% CI, 5.80-62.95), poor differentiation (RR, 5.65; 95% CI, 1.76-18.20), location on the ear (RR, 4.67; 95% CI, 1.28-17.12) or lip (RR, 4.55; 95% CI, 1.41-14.69), invasion beyond subcutaneous fat (RR, 4.49; 95% CI, 2.05-9.82), and perineural invasion (RR, 4.06; 95% CI, 3.10-5.32). Evidence quality was considered low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Tumor depth is associated with the highest RR of local recurrence and metastasis of cSCC, and tumor diameter exceeding 20 mm is associated with the highest RR of DSD. Unified, consistent collection and reporting of risk factors in a prospective, multicentered effort are needed to further understand the increasing incidence of cSCC.
Authors: John T Mullen; Lei Feng; Yan Xing; Paul F Mansfield; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Jeffrey E Lee; Merrick I Ross; Janice N Cormier Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2006-05-22 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Howard W Rogers; Martin A Weinstock; Ashlynne R Harris; Michael R Hinckley; Steven R Feldman; Alan B Fleischer; Brett M Coldiron Journal: Arch Dermatol Date: 2010-03
Authors: Kay D Brantsch; Christoph Meisner; Birgitt Schönfisch; Birgit Trilling; Jörg Wehner-Caroli; Martin Röcken; Helmut Breuninger Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2008-07-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: P J F Quaedvlieg; D H K V Creytens; G G Epping; C J Peutz-Kootstra; F H M Nieman; M R T M Thissen; G A Krekels Journal: Histopathology Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Catherine A Harwood; Charlotte M Proby; Jane M McGregor; Michael T Sheaff; Irene M Leigh; Rino Cerio Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Joana Lanz; Jan Nico Bouwes Bavinck; Marlies Westhuis; Koen D Quint; Catherine A Harwood; Shaaira Nasir; Vanessa Van-de-Velde; Charlotte M Proby; Carlos Ferrándiz; Roel E Genders; Véronique Del Marmol; Giulia Forchetti; Jürg Hafner; Domenic G Vital; Guenther F L Hofbauer Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Mary L Stevenson; Maressa C Criscito; Reason Wilken; Nicole A Doudican; Earl Eugene Bain; Bhupesh Parashar; John A Carucci Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Gino K In; Poorva Vaidya; Alexandra Filkins; David J Hermel; Kevin G King; Omar Ragab; William W Tseng; Mark Swanson; Niels Kokot; Julie E Lang; Lawrence Menendez; Brittney DeClerck; Gene Kim; Jenny C Hu; Alicia Terando; Hossein Jadvar; Charité Ricker; Kimberly A Miller; David H Peng; Ashley Wysong Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Kristin Bibee; Andrew Swartz; Shaum Sridharan; Cornelius H L Kurten; Charles B Wessel; Heath Skinner; Dan P Zandberg Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2020-02-14 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Zoë C Venables; Philippe Autier; Tamar Nijsten; Kwok F Wong; Sinéad M Langan; Brian Rous; John Broggio; Catherine Harwood; Katherine Henson; Charlotte M Proby; Jem Rashbass; Irene M Leigh Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 10.282