Literature DB >> 16917768

Contralateral and ipsilateral motor activation in visual simple reaction time: a test of the hemispheric coactivation model.

Jeff Miller1.   

Abstract

Motor potentials contralateral versus ipsilateral to the responding hand were examined in a visual simple reaction time (RT) experiment in order to test the hemispheric coactivation model of Miller (Cogn Psychol 49:118-154, 2004). Visual stimuli were presented on the left side of fixation, on the right side, or on both sides, and in the RT task participants had to respond as quickly as possible to the onset of any stimulus. The same stimulus displays were also presented in a counting task, for which participants had merely to count the stimuli. Hemisphere-specific movement-related potentials contralateral and ipsilateral to the responding hand were isolated by subtracting count-task ERPs from RT-task ERPs. Consistent with the hemispheric coactivation model, there was evidence of movement-related ipsilateral positivity as well as contralateral negativity, suggesting that the motor areas of both hemispheres contribute to response initiation in simple RT. The distinction between contralateral and ipsilateral motor activation appears useful in clarifying the roles of the two hemispheres in response initiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16917768     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0641-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   2.064


  80 in total

1.  Locus of the redundant-signals effect in bimodal divided attention: a neurophysiological analysis.

Authors:  J Miller; R Ulrich; Y Lamarre
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-04

2.  How to avoid the fallacies of cognitive subtraction in brain imaging.

Authors:  G Sartori; C Umiltà
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Sensorimotor slowing with ageing is mediated by a functional dysregulation of motor-generation processes: evidence from high-resolution event-related potentials.

Authors:  Juliana Yordanova; Vasil Kolev; Joachim Hohnsbein; Michael Falkenstein
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Redundancy gain in simple reaction time following partial and complete callosotomy.

Authors:  Michael C Corballis; Paul M Corballis; Mara Fabri
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Absence of coactivation in the motor component: evidence from psychophysiological measures of target detection.

Authors:  J T Mordkoff; J Miller; A C Roch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  An fMRI study of the human cortical motor system response to increasing functional demands.

Authors:  B E Wexler; R K Fulbright; C M Lacadie; P Skudlarski; M B Kelz; R T Constable; J C Gore
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 7.  Detecting early communication: using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing.

Authors:  M G Coles; G Gratton; E Donchin
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.251

8.  The continuous flow model revisited: perceptual and central motor aspects.

Authors:  H G Smid; G Mulder; L J Mulder
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1987

9.  Is the contingent negative variation contingent on a motor response?

Authors:  E Donchin; L A Gerbrandt; L Leifer; L Tucker
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Both primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area play an important role in complex finger movement.

Authors:  H Shibasaki; N Sadato; H Lyshkow; Y Yonekura; M Honda; T Nagamine; S Suwazono; Y Magata; A Ikeda; M Miyazaki
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  7 in total

1.  A unique role of endogenous visual-spatial attention in rapid processing of multiple targets.

Authors:  Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; German Palafox; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Dragan Rangelov; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Visuospatial attention and redundancy gain.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Daniela Beutinger; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-09

4.  Speed pressure in conflict situations impedes inhibitory action control in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  N C van Wouwe; W P M van den Wildenberg; D O Claassen; K Kanoff; T R Bashore; S A Wylie
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  The effect of task order predictability in audio-visual dual task performance: Just a central capacity limitation?

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Tilo Strobach; Torsten Schubert; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-11

6.  Interhemispheric interactions and redundancy gain: tests of an interhemispheric inhibition hypothesis.

Authors:  Jeff Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  Modeling violations of the race model inequality in bimodal paradigms: co-activation from decision and non-decision components.

Authors:  Michael Zehetleitner; Emil Ratko-Dehnert; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.