Literature DB >> 16911889

The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain.

Duygu Sarac1, Y Sinasi Sarac, Emir Yuzbasioglu, Seda Bal.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: After the adjustment of glazed porcelain surfaces, the surfaces are roughened and must be reglazed or polished with different porcelain polishing systems to improve the esthetic appearance and strength of the porcelain restorations.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of different porcelain polishing methods on the color and surface texture of a feldspathic ceramic.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety porcelain (Vitadur Alpha) discs (10 x 2 mm) were fabricated in a silicone mold and divided into 9 groups (n=10). A medium-grit diamond rotary cutting instrument was used to remove the glaze layer, and then the surface was polished using 1 of the 4 following polishing systems or a combination thereof: polishing paste (Ultra II), polishing stick (Diamond Stick), polishing wheel (CeraMaster), or an adjustment kit (Porcelain Adjustment Kit). No surface treatments were applied to the control group. Color measurements were made using a colorimeter (Minolta CR-321 ChromaMeter) according to the CIE L( *)a( *)b( *) color system. Color differences (DeltaE) between the control group and experimental groups were calculated. The acceptable level was chosen as 3.3 DeltaE units. Then the surface roughness (Ra) (microm) of the same specimens was evaluated using a profilometer. The data were statistically analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey HSD tests (alpha=.05). To evaluate the effects of the polishing systems on the ceramic surfaces at a microscopic level, an additional 9 feldspathic ceramic specimens were prepared and polished to represent each of the 9 groups. These specimens were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
RESULTS: Polishing techniques significantly affected the color of the feldspathic ceramic (P<.001). The DeltaE values ranged from 1.03 to 3.36. No significant differences were found within the adjustment kit groups or within the polishing wheel groups. All specimens polished with the various techniques showed significantly different Ra values than the control specimens (P<.001), except for the groups polished using the adjustment kit. The highest Ra and DeltaE values were obtained with the use of polishing paste and polishing stick alone (P<.001). The SEM observations demonstrated that the polishing techniques affected the smoothness of the porcelain surface.
CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of the polishing techniques showed that the use of an adjustment kit alone or preceding polishing paste or polishing stick application created surfaces as smooth as glazed specimens. The use of polishing paste alone did not improve the smoothness of the porcelain surface. The color differences of all groups were found to be at the acceptable level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16911889     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  18 in total

1.  An in vitro study to identify a ceramic polishing protocol effecting smoothness superior to glazed surface.

Authors:  Noxy George Manjuran; T Sreelal
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-08-22

2.  An in vitro investigation to compare the surface roughness of auto glazed, reglazed and chair side polished surfaces of Ivoclar and Vita feldspathic porcelain.

Authors:  Sumit Sethi; Dilip Kakade; Shantanu Jambhekar; Vinay Jain
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2012-12-14

3.  Evaluation of the surface roughness in dental ceramics submitted to different finishing and polishing methods.

Authors:  Alex C Vieira; Mario C S Oliveira; Emilena M C X Lima; Isabel Rambob; Mariana Leite
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-03-08

4.  Surface Characteristics of High Translucent Multilayered Dental Zirconia Related to Aging.

Authors:  Flavia Roxana Toma; Mihaela Ionela Bîrdeanu; Ion-Dragoș Uțu; Roxana Diana Vasiliu; Lavinia Cristina Moleriu; Liliana Porojan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.748

5.  A comparative study on the effect of polishing systems on the color and surface texture of different porcelain systems - feldspathic, pressable, and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing.

Authors:  Preeti Kalia; K Chandrasekharan Nair; Deepesh Jaiswal; Chetna Tikmani; Dhrubojyoti Banerjee; Ritwika Bera
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun

6.  A comparative evaluation of bond strength of feldspathic porcelain to nickel-chromium alloy, when subjected to various surface treatments: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Kavan A Patel; Somil Mathur; Snehal Upadhyay
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

7.  Effects of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of dental porcelains.

Authors:  Işil Sarikaya; Ahmet Umut Güler
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  Porcelain surface alterations and refinishing after use of two orthodontic bonding methods.

Authors:  Drew T Herion; Jack L Ferracane; David A Covell
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Effect of polishing and glazing on the color and spectral distribution of monolithic zirconia.

Authors:  Hee-Kyung Kim; Sung-Hun Kim; Jai-Bong Lee; Jung-Suk Han; In-Sung Yeo
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

10.  Effect of two different finishing systems on surface roughness of feldspathic and fluorapatite porcelains in ceramo-metal restorations: Comparative in vitro study.

Authors:  Cherry Anmol; Sumeet Soni
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.