Literature DB >> 24431779

An in vitro investigation to compare the surface roughness of auto glazed, reglazed and chair side polished surfaces of Ivoclar and Vita feldspathic porcelain.

Sumit Sethi1, Dilip Kakade1, Shantanu Jambhekar2, Vinay Jain3.   

Abstract

The change in surface roughness after different surface finishing techniques has attracted the attention of several prosthodontists regarding wear of opposing teeth or restorative material and the strength; plaque retention and appearance of the restoration. However, there is considerable controversy concerning the best methods to achieve the smoothest and strongest porcelain restorations after chair side clinical adjustments. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the average surface roughness of a self-glazed surface, a chair side polished surface and a reglazed surface of ceramic. Two feldspathic porcelain, namely VITA VMK94 (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Sachingen, Germany) and IVOCLAR CLASSIC (Vivadent AG, FL-9494 Schaan, Liechtenstein) were selected to fabricate 20 specimens of each in the shape of shade guide tabs. A medium-grit diamond rotary cutting instrument was used to remove the glaze layer, and then the surface of half the specimens were re-glazed and the other half were polished using a well-defined sequence of polishing comprising of: Shofu porcelain polishing system, White gloss disc/polishing wheel, Silicone cone with diamond polishing paste and finally with small buff wheel with pumice slurry. The surface roughness (Ra) (μm) of the specimens was evaluated using a profilometer and scanning electron microscope. The data were statistically analyzed by using Student's t test. The results had shown that there is no statistically significant difference both quantitatively and qualitatively, between the surface roughness of reglazed and chair-side polished surface. In addition, both reglazed and chair-side polished surfaces are better than the autoglazed surface. Within all the groups, there is no significant difference between companies. Polishing an adjusted porcelain surface with the suggested sequence of polishing will lead to a finish similar to a re-glazed surface. Therefore chair-side polishing can be a good alternative to reglazing for finishing adjusted porcelain surface.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auto-glazed; Chair-side polished; Re-glazed; Scanning electron microscope; Surface profilometer

Year:  2012        PMID: 24431779      PMCID: PMC3792303          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0223-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  33 in total

1.  Effect of surface roughness of porcelain on adhesion of bacteria and their synthesizing glucans.

Authors:  K Kawai; M Urano; S Ebisu
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 2.  Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: a literature review.

Authors:  Won-Suck Oh; Ralph Delong; Kenneth J Anusavice
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Effect of glazed and polished surface finishes on the friction coefficient of two low-fusing ceramics.

Authors:  Christian Schuh; Eder Julio Kinast; Elio Mezzomo; Myriam Pereira Kapczinski
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  An evaluation of three methods of polishing porcelain by comparison of surface topography with the original glaze.

Authors:  A R Grieve; I W Jeffrey; S J Sharma
Journal:  Restorative Dent       Date:  1991-05

5.  The effect of glazed and polished ceramics on human enamel wear.

Authors:  Anna Belsuzarri Olivera; Edmir Matson; Márcia Martins Marques
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.681

6.  The abrasive effect of glazed, unglazed, and polished porcelain on the wear of human enamel, and the influence of carbonated soft drinks on the rate of wear.

Authors:  A S al-Hiyasat; W P Saunders; S W Sharkey; G M Smith; W H Gilmour
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

7.  Roughness of pontic materials and dental plaque.

Authors:  J A Clayton; E Green
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of unglazed, glazed, and polished porcelain on human enamel.

Authors:  D C Jagger; A Harrison
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  An evaluation of postadjustment polishing techniques for porcelain denture teeth.

Authors:  E R Schlissel; D A Newitter; R R Renner; A J Gwinnett
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Polished versus autoglazed porcelain surfaces.

Authors:  L H Klausner; C B Cartwright; G T Charbeneau
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The effect of surface roughness on ceramics used in dentistry: A review of literature.

Authors:  Haroon Rashid
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-10

2.  Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns-Results of Different Dental Practitioner Groups.

Authors:  Carla Kozmacs; Britta Hollmann; Wolfgang H Arnold; Ella Naumova; Andree Piwowarczyk
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-14

3.  Comparative analysis of flexural strength of abraded and polished porcelain surfaces - an in vitro study.

Authors:  Prathibha Nandagiri; Mamidi Praveen; Shikha Singh; Monika Singh; Namratha Chandrahari; Fayez Hussain Niazi
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

4.  An In vitro Evaluation to Compare the Surface Roughness of Glazed, Reglazed and Chair Side Polished Surfaces of Dental Porcelain.

Authors:  Varsha Rani; Sanjeev Mittal; Urvashi Sukhija
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2021-06-14

5.  Surface Characteristics and Biofilm Development on Selected Dental Ceramic Materials.

Authors:  Kyoung H Kim; Carolina Loch; J Neil Waddell; Geoffrey Tompkins; Donald Schwass
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-05-08

6.  Effect of Thermocycling, Surface Treatments and Microstructure on the Optical Properties and Roughness of CAD-CAM and Heat-Pressed Glass Ceramics.

Authors:  Roxana-Diana Vasiliu; Sorin Daniel Porojan; Mihaela Ionela Bîrdeanu; Liliana Porojan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.