Literature DB >> 16909301

Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up.

Stefano Zaffagnini1, Maurilio Marcacci, Mirco Lo Presti, Giovanni Giordano, Francesco Iacono, Maria Pia Neri.   

Abstract

A variety of graft sources have been used for ACL reconstruction to improve functions and kinematics in ACL deficient knees. The two most commonly used autogenous grafts are the central third of the patellar tendon and the hamstring tendon constructs. The choice of different grafts and different construct influence the final clinical outcome of ACL reconstruction. The 3 groups, of 25 patients each, were generated by choosing the technique (PT tendon, 4 strand hamstring, and single hamstring plus extraarticular plasty) to utilize and followed for 5 years, with an alternate systematic sampling. Our comparison has shown significant kneeling pain in the patellar tendon with respect to the groups with hamstrings techniques. Single hamstring plus extraarticular plasty achieved subjective score significantly higher with respect to the other two groups as well as for the time to resume sport. The study confirms that patellar tendon and hamstring can be equivalent options for ACL reconstruction. This study demonstrated that a superior outcome as far as subjective clinical findings were concerned, was obtained in group III. Patients in the latter group were also able to return to sports sooner than those in the bone-patellar tendon graft group and the four-strand hamstring group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16909301     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0130-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  51 in total

1.  [The results after 10-16 years of the treatment of chronic anterior laxity of the knee using reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with a patellar tendon graft combined with an external extra-articular reconstruction].

Authors:  J L Lerat; F Chotel; J L Besse; B Moyen; G Binet; T Craviari; E Brunet-Guedj; P Adeleine; J C Nemoz
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1998-11

2.  Mechanical behavior of two hamstring graft constructs for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  J Höher; S U Scheffler; J D Withrow; G A Livesay; R E Debski; F H Fu; S L Woo
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon.

Authors:  Leo Chen; Vernon Cooley; Thomas Rosenberg
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the semitendinosus tendon: comparison of results with and without braided polypropylene augmentation.

Authors:  N A Sgaglione; W Del Pizzo; J M Fox; M J Friedman; S J Snyder; R D Ferkel
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A prospective randomized study of three surgical methods.

Authors:  A F Anderson; R B Snyder; A B Lipscomb
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Braden C Fleming; Pekka Kannus; Michael Kaplan; John Samani; Per Renström
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Retrospective direct comparison of three intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  P F Holmes; S L James; R L Larson; K M Singer; D C Jones
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  A comparison of the doubled semitendinosus/gracilis and central third of the patellar tendon autografts in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  A L Otero; L Hutcheson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Intra- and extra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction utilizing autogeneous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons: 5-year clinical results.

Authors:  Maurilio Marcacci; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Iacono; Alberto Vascellari; Ivano Loreti; Elisaveta Kon; Mirco Lo Presti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  62 in total

1.  Navigated intra-articular ACL reconstruction with additional extra-articular tenodesis using the same hamstring graft.

Authors:  Philippe D Colombet
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Combined anterolateral ligament and anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee.

Authors:  James O Smith; Sam K Yasen; Breck Lord; Adrian J Wilson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Does Combined Intra- and Extraarticular ACL Reconstruction Improve Function and Stability? A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fernando Cury Rezende; Vinicius Ynoe de Moraes; Marcus Vinícius Luzo; Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Franciozi; João Carlos Belloti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Survivorship and clinical outcomes of 147 consecutive isolated or combined arthroscopic bone plug free meniscal allograft transplantation.

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Alberto Grassi; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Andrea Benzi; Margherita Serra; Marco Rotini; Laura Bragonzoni; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Single-bundle versus double-bundle ACL reconstructions in isolation and in conjunction with extra-articular iliotibial band tenodesis.

Authors:  Paul D Butler; Chloe J Mellecker; M James Rudert; John P Albright
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

6.  Long-term results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison with non-operative treatment with a follow-up of 17-20 years.

Authors:  Radovan Mihelic; Hari Jurdana; Zdravko Jotanovic; Tomislav Madjarevic; Anton Tudor
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Does a lateral plasty control coupled translation during antero-posterior stress in single-bundle ACL reconstruction? An in vivo study.

Authors:  Simone Bignozzi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Nicola Lopomo; Sandra Martelli; Francesco Iacono; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Variables associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sylvia Czuppon; Brad A Racette; Sandra E Klein; Marcie Harris-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  The effect of patient and injury factors on long-term outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Curr Orthop Pract       Date:  2011-01-01

10.  Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: how, when and why? A narrative review of current evidence.

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Alberto Grassi; Margherita Serra; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-06-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.