Literature DB >> 16906452

Heterogeneity of breast cancer among patients and implications for patient selection for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Fabrice Andre1, Lajos Pusztai.   

Abstract

Although the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy are not controversial, the absolute effect of such therapy is small. Therefore, there is a need to identify biomarkers that can help select patients with localized breast cancer for treatment. Despite intense research in this field, no biomarker has been shown to be useful to predict benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in daily practice. This can partially be explained by the fact that breast cancer is composed of several distinct subclasses, as shown by large-scale genomic analyses. In this review, we discuss why the current research approach based on a single biomarker is limited by the heterogeneity of cancer among patients. We then propose three solutions to improve the research strategies in this field: investigate one biomarker in a single homogeneous subclass to improve its predictive value; study the predictive value of multibiomarker assays in larger populations; and use functional pathways to predict the efficacy of a given drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16906452     DOI: 10.1007/s11095-006-9075-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  49 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of taxane-containing versus non-taxane-containing regimens for adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of early breast cancer.

Authors:  A K Nowak; N R C Wilcken; M R Stockler; A Hamilton; D Ghersi
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Outcome signature genes in breast cancer: is there a unique set?

Authors:  Liat Ein-Dor; Itai Kela; Gad Getz; David Givol; Eytan Domany
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Reproducibility of gene expression signature-based predictions in replicate experiments.

Authors:  Keith Anderson; Kenneth R Hess; Mini Kapoor; Stephen Tirrell; Jean Courtemanche; Bailiang Wang; Yun Wu; Yun Gong; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; W Fraser Symmans; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  High-throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well-characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses.

Authors:  Dalia M Abd El-Rehim; Graham Ball; Sarah E Pinder; Emad Rakha; Claire Paish; John F R Robertson; Douglas Macmillan; Roger W Blamey; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  The importance of histologic grade in long-term prognosis of breast cancer: a study of 1,010 patients, uniformly treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy.

Authors:  G Contesso; H Mouriesse; S Friedman; J Genin; D Sarrazin; J Rouesse
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Effect of mutated TP53 on response of advanced breast cancers to high-dose chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Bertheau; F Plassa; M Espié; E Turpin; A de Roquancourt; M Marty; F Lerebours; Y Beuzard; A Janin; H de Thé
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-09-14       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Torsten O Nielsen; Forrest D Hsu; Kristin Jensen; Maggie Cheang; Gamze Karaca; Zhiyuan Hu; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Chad Livasy; Dave Cowan; Lynn Dressler; Lars A Akslen; Joseph Ragaz; Allen M Gown; C Blake Gilks; Matt van de Rijn; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  A mutant TP53 gene status is associated with a poor prognosis and anthracycline-resistance in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  E Rahko; G Blanco; Y Soini; R Bloigu; A Jukkola
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  p53-deficient cells display increased sensitivity to anthracyclines after loss of the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase.

Authors:  André Fedier; Ahmed Moawad; Urs Haller; Daniel Fink
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.650

View more
  3 in total

1.  Microvessel density and status of p53 protein as potential prognostic factors for adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy in retrospective analysis of early breast cancer patients group.

Authors:  Beata Biesaga; Joanna Niemiec; Marek Ziobro
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Transcriptomic landscape of breast cancers through mRNA sequencing.

Authors:  Jeyanthy Eswaran; Dinesh Cyanam; Prakriti Mudvari; Sirigiri Divijendra Natha Reddy; Suresh B Pakala; Sujit S Nair; Liliana Florea; Suzanne A W Fuqua; Sucheta Godbole; Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The prognostic relevance of p53 and Ki-67 to chemotherapy sensitivity and prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Guojing Zhang; Zhongyi Shi; Lina Liu; Heqing Yuan; Zheng Pan; Wenxu Li; Yu Tao; Zhaoming Huang; Xiaoying Huang; Chao Lin
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.