Literature DB >> 16898456

Peripheral doses from pediatric IMRT.

Eric E Klein1, Beth Maserang, Roy Wood, David Mansur.   

Abstract

Peripheral dose (PD) data exist for conventional fields (> or = 10 cm) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) delivery to standard adult-sized phantoms. Pediatric peripheral dose reports are limited to conventional therapy and are model based. Our goal was to ascertain whether data acquired from full phantom studies and/or pediatric models, with IMRT treatment times, could predict Organ at Risk (OAR) dose for pediatric IMRT. As monitor units (MUs) are greater for IMRT, it is expected IMRT PD will be higher; potentially compounded by decreased patient size (absorption). Baseline slab phantom peripheral dose measurements were conducted for very small field sizes (from 2 to 10 cm). Data were collected at distances ranging from 5 to 72 cm away from the field edges. Collimation was either with the collimating jaws or the multileaf collimator (MLC) oriented either perpendicular or along the peripheral dose measurement plane. For the clinical tests, five patients with intracranial or base of skull lesions were chosen. IMRT and conventional three-dimensional (3D) plans for the same patient/target/dose (180 cGy), were optimized without limitation to the number of fields or wedge use. Six MV, 120-leaf MLC Varian axial beams were used. A phantom mimicking a 3-year-old was configured per Center for Disease Control data. Micro (0.125 cc) and cylindrical (0.6 cc) ionization chambers were appropriated for the thyroid, breast, ovaries, and testes. The PD was recorded by electrometers set to the 10(-10) scale. Each system set was uniquely calibrated. For the slab phantom studies, close peripheral points were found to have a higher dose for low energy and larger field size and when MLC was not deployed. For points more distant from the field edge, the PD was higher for high-energy beams. MLC orientation was found to be inconsequential for the small fields tested. The thyroid dose was lower for IMRT delivery than that predicted for conventional (ratio of IMRT/conventional ranged from 0.47-0.94) doses approximately [0.4-1.8 cGy]/[0.9-2.9 cGy]/fraction, respectively. Prior phantom reports are for fields 10 cm or greater, while pediatric central nervous system fields range from 4 to 7 cm, and effectively much smaller for IMRT (2-6 cm). Peripheral dose in close proximity (< 10 cm from the field edge) is dominated by internal scatter; therefore, field-size differences overwhelm phantom size affects and increased MU. Distant peripheral dose, dominated by head leakage, was higher than predicted, even when accounting for MUs (approximtely factor of 3) likely due to the pediatric phantom size. The ratio of the testes dose ranged from 3.3-5.3 for IMRT/conventional. PD to OAR for pediatric IMRT cannot be predicted from large-field full phantom studies. For regional OAR, doses are likely lower than predicted by existing "large field" data, while the distant PD is higher.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16898456     DOI: 10.1118/1.2207252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  13 in total

1.  Methodology for determining doses to in-field, out-of-field and partially in-field organs for late effects studies in photon radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rebecca M Howell; Sarah B Scarboro; Phillip J Taddei; Sunil Krishnan; Stephen F Kry; Wayne D Newhauser
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Assessment of the risk for developing a second malignancy from scattered and secondary radiation in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 3.  Radiation-induced gliomas.

Authors:  Gautam Prasad; Daphne A Haas-Kogan
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.618

Review 4.  Radiation therapy for children: evolving technologies in the era of ALARA.

Authors:  Larry E Kun; Chris Beltran
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-12-16

Review 5.  A review of dosimetry studies on external-beam radiation treatment with respect to second cancer induction.

Authors:  X George Xu; Bryan Bednarz; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Assessment of organ-specific neutron equivalent doses in proton therapy using computational whole-body age-dependent voxel phantoms.

Authors:  Christina Zacharatou Jarlskog; Choonik Lee; Wesley E Bolch; X George Xu; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Immediate reconstruction with an expander/implant following ablatio mammae because of breast cancer : side effects and cosmetic results after adjuvant chest wall radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marc D Piroth; Daniela M Piroth; Michael Pinkawa; Seth G Woodruff; Richard Holy; Michael J Eble
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Consideration of the radiation dose delivered away from the treatment field to patients in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Michael L Taylor; Tomas Kron
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2011-04

9.  Radiotherapy-induced malignancies: review of clinical features, pathobiology, and evolving approaches for mitigating risk.

Authors:  Steve Braunstein; Jean L Nakamura
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Out-of-field dose in stereotactic radiotherapy for paediatric patients.

Authors:  Lachlan Garrett; Nicholas Hardcastle; Adam Yeo; Peta Lonski; Rick Franich; Tomas Kron
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.