Literature DB >> 16898024

How do leaf hydraulics limit stomatal conductance at high water vapour pressure deficits?

James A Bunce1.   

Abstract

A reduction in leaf stomatal conductance (g) with increasing leaf-to-air difference in water vapour pressure (D) is nearly ubiquitous. Ecological comparisons of sensitivity have led to the hypothesis that the reduction in g with increasing D serves to maintain leaf water potentials above those that would cause loss of hydraulic conductance. A reduction in leaf water potential is commonly hypothesized to cause stomatal closure at high D. The importance of these particular hydraulic factors was tested by exposing Abutilon theophrasti, Glycine max, Gossypium hirsutum and Xanthium strumarium to D high enough to reduce g and then decreasing ambient carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]), and observing the resulting changes in g, transpiration rate and leaf water potential, and their reversibility. Reducing the [CO2] at high D increased g and transpiration rate and lowered leaf water potential. The abnormally high transpiration rates did not result in reductions in hydraulic conductance. Results indicate that low water potential effects on g at high D could be overcome by low [CO2], and that even lower leaf water potentials did not cause a reduction in hydraulic conductance in these well-watered plants. Reduced g at high D in these species resulted primarily from increased stomatal sensitivity to [CO2] at high D, and this increased sensitivity may mediate stomatal responses to leaf hydraulics at high D.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16898024     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01541.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Environ        ISSN: 0140-7791            Impact factor:   7.228


  13 in total

1.  Hydraulic failure defines the recovery and point of death in water-stressed conifers.

Authors:  Tim J Brodribb; Hervé Cochard
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Evolution of the Stomatal Regulation of Plant Water Content.

Authors:  Timothy J Brodribb; Scott A M McAdam
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Reduced plant water status under sub-ambient pCO2 limits plant productivity in the wild progenitors of C3 and C4 cereals.

Authors:  Jennifer Cunniff; Michael Charles; Glynis Jones; Colin P Osborne
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Atmospheric vapor pressure deficit is critical in predicting growth response of "cool-season" grass Festuca arundinacea to temperature change.

Authors:  Thomas Sinclair; Edwin Fiscus; Ben Wherley; Michael Durham; Thomas Rufty
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Herb Hydraulics: Inter- and Intraspecific Variation in Three Ranunculus Species.

Authors:  Markus Nolf; Andrea Rosani; Andrea Ganthaler; Barbara Beikircher; Stefan Mayr
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Salinity Stress Affects Photosynthesis, Malondialdehyde Formation, and Proline Content in Portulaca oleracea L.

Authors:  Helena Hnilickova; Kamil Kraus; Pavla Vachova; Frantisek Hnilicka
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22

7.  Effect of salinity on water relations of wild barley plants differing in salt tolerance.

Authors:  Lidia Vysotskaya; Peter E Hedley; Guzel Sharipova; Dmitry Veselov; Guzel Kudoyarova; Jennifer Morris; Hamlyn G Jones
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.276

8.  Relating Stomatal Conductance to Leaf Functional Traits.

Authors:  Wenzel Kröber; Isa Plath; Heike Heklau; Helge Bruelheide
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 9.  Aquaporin Activity to Improve Crop Drought Tolerance.

Authors:  Avat Shekoofa; Thomas R Sinclair
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  An Integrated View of Whole-Tree Hydraulic Architecture. Does Stomatal or Hydraulic Conductance Determine Whole Tree Transpiration?

Authors:  Juan Rodríguez-Gamir; Eduardo Primo-Millo; María Ángeles Forner-Giner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.