Literature DB >> 26896395

Herb Hydraulics: Inter- and Intraspecific Variation in Three Ranunculus Species.

Markus Nolf1, Andrea Rosani2, Andrea Ganthaler2, Barbara Beikircher2, Stefan Mayr2.   

Abstract

The requirements of the water transport system of small herbaceous species differ considerably from those of woody species. Despite their ecological importance for many biomes, knowledge regarding herb hydraulics remains very limited. We compared key hydraulic features (vulnerability to drought-induced hydraulic decline, pressure-volume relations, onset of cellular damage, in situ variation of water potential, and stomatal conductance) of three Ranunculus species differing in their soil humidity preferences and ecological amplitude. All species were very vulnerable to water stress (50% reduction in whole-leaf hydraulic conductance [kleaf] at -0.2 to -0.8 MPa). In species with narrow ecological amplitude, the drought-exposed Ranunculus bulbosus was less vulnerable to desiccation (analyzed via loss of kleaf and turgor loss point) than the humid-habitat Ranunculus lanuginosus Accordingly, water stress-exposed plants from the broad-amplitude Ranunculus acris revealed tendencies toward lower vulnerability to water stress (e.g. osmotic potential at full turgor, cell damage, and stomatal closure) than conspecific plants from the humid site. We show that small herbs can adjust to their habitat conditions on interspecific and intraspecific levels in various hydraulic parameters. The coordination of hydraulic thresholds (50% and 88% loss of kleaf, turgor loss point, and minimum in situ water potential) enabled the study species to avoid hydraulic failure and damage to living cells. Reversible recovery of hydraulic conductance, desiccation-tolerant seeds, or rhizomes may allow them to prioritize toward a more efficient but vulnerable water transport system while avoiding the severe effects that water stress poses on woody species.
© 2016 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26896395      PMCID: PMC4825137          DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.01664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  53 in total

1.  Stomatal closure during leaf dehydration, correlation with other leaf physiological traits.

Authors:  Tim J Brodribb; N Michele Holbrook
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Spring filling of xylem vessels in wild grapevine.

Authors:  J S Sperry; N M Holbrook; M H Zimmermann; M T Tyree
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  Leaf hydraulics.

Authors:  Lawren Sack; N Michele Holbrook
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 26.379

4.  How do leaf hydraulics limit stomatal conductance at high water vapour pressure deficits?

Authors:  James A Bunce
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.228

5.  Intra-specific variation in xylem cavitation in interior live oak (Quercus wislizenii A. DC.).

Authors:  S L Matzner; K J Rice; J H Richards
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.992

6.  Water stress deforms tracheids peripheral to the leaf vein of a tropical conifer.

Authors:  Tim J Brodribb; N Michele Holbrook
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Detection of Xylem Cavitation in Corn under Field Conditions.

Authors:  M T Tyree; E L Fiscus; S D Wullschleger; M A Dixon
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Cavitation fatigue and its reversal in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.).

Authors:  Volker Stiller; John S Sperry
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.992

9.  Transient Responses of Cell Turgor and Growth of Maize Roots as Affected by Changes in Water Potential.

Authors:  J. Frensch; T. C. Hsiao
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Hydraulic properties of rice and the response of gas exchange to water stress.

Authors:  Volker Stiller; H Renee Lafitte; John S Sperry
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Causes of Leaf Hydraulic Vulnerability and Its Influence on Gas Exchange in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Christine Scoffoni; Caetano Albuquerque; Hervé Cochard; Thomas N Buckley; Leila R Fletcher; Marissa A Caringella; Megan Bartlett; Craig R Brodersen; Steven Jansen; Andrew J McElrone; Lawren Sack
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Insights from in vivo micro-CT analysis: testing the hydraulic vulnerability segmentation in Acer pseudoplatanus and Fagus sylvatica seedlings.

Authors:  Adriano Losso; Andreas Bär; Birgit Dämon; Christian Dullin; Andrea Ganthaler; Francesco Petruzzellis; Tadeja Savi; Giuliana Tromba; Andrea Nardini; Stefan Mayr; Barbara Beikircher
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Embolism resistance in stems of herbaceous Brassicaceae and Asteraceae is linked to differences in woodiness and precipitation.

Authors:  Larissa Chacon Dória; Cynthia Meijs; Diego Sotto Podadera; Marcelino Del Arco; Erik Smets; Sylvain Delzon; Frederic Lens
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Transgenerational effects of temperature fluctuations in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Ying Deng; Oliver Bossdorf; J F Scheepens
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 3.276

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.