Literature DB >> 27578764

Reduced plant water status under sub-ambient pCO2 limits plant productivity in the wild progenitors of C3 and C4 cereals.

Jennifer Cunniff1, Michael Charles2, Glynis Jones3, Colin P Osborne4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The reduction of plant productivity by low atmospheric CO2 partial pressure (pCO2) during the last glacial period is proposed as a limiting factor for the establishment of agriculture. Supporting this hypothesis, previous work has shown that glacial pCO2 limits biomass in the wild progenitors of C3 and C4 founder crops, in part due to the direct effects of glacial pCO2 on photosynthesis. Here, we investigate the indirect role of pCO2 mediated via water status, hypothesizing that faster soil water depletion at glacial (18 Pa) compared to post-glacial (27 Pa) pCO2, due to greater stomatal conductance, feeds back to limit photosynthesis during drying cycles.
METHODS: We grew four wild progenitors of C3 and C4 crops at glacial and post-glacial pCO2 and investigated physiological changes in gas exchange, canopy transpiration, soil water content and water potential between regular watering events. Growth parameters including leaf area were measured. KEY
RESULTS: Initial transpiration rates were higher at glacial pCO2 due to greater stomatal conductance. However, stomatal conductance declined more rapidly over the soil drying cycle in glacial pCO2 and was associated with decreased intercellular pCO2 and lower photosynthesis. Soil water content was similar between pCO2 levels as larger leaf areas at post-glacial pCO2 offset the slower depletion of water. Instead the feedback could be linked to reduced plant water status. Particularly in the C4 plants, soil-leaf water potential gradients were greater at 18 Pa compared with 27 Pa pCO2, suggesting an increased ratio of leaf evaporative demand to supply.
CONCLUSIONS: Reduced plant water status appeared to cause a negative feedback on stomatal aperture in plants at glacial pCO2, thereby reducing photosynthesis. The effects were stronger in C4 species, providing a mechanism for reduced biomass at 18 Pa. These results have added significance when set against the drier climate of the glacial period.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C3 photosynthesis; C4 photosynthesis; Hordeum spontaneum; Panicum miliaceum var. ruderale; Setaria viridis; Triticum boeoticum; crop progenitors.; origin of agriculture; sub-ambient pCO2; water relations

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27578764      PMCID: PMC5091726          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcw165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  19 in total

1.  A new, vapour-phase mechanism for stomatal responses to humidity and temperature.

Authors:  David Peak; Keith A Mott
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 7.228

2.  Drought constraints on C4 photosynthesis: stomatal and metabolic limitations in C3 and C4 subspecies of Alloteropsis semialata.

Authors:  Brad S Ripley; Matthew E Gilbert; Douglas G Ibrahim; Colin P Osborne
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 3.  The nature of selection during plant domestication.

Authors:  Michael D Purugganan; Dorian Q Fuller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Internal coordination between hydraulics and stomatal control in leaves.

Authors:  Tim J Brodribb; Gregory J Jordan
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 7.228

5.  Photosynthesis, productivity, and yield of maize are not affected by open-air elevation of CO2 concentration in the absence of drought.

Authors:  Andrew D B Leakey; Martin Uribelarrea; Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Shawna L Naidu; Alistair Rogers; Donald R Ort; Stephen P Long
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Molecular and physiological analysis of drought stress in Arabidopsis reveals early responses leading to acclimation in plant growth.

Authors:  Amal Harb; Arjun Krishnan; Madana M R Ambavaram; Andy Pereira
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Drought limitation of photosynthesis differs between C₃and C₄grass species in a comparative experiment.

Authors:  S H Taylor; B S Ripley; F I Woodward; C P Osborne
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 7.228

Review 8.  Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and the future of C4 crops for food and fuel.

Authors:  Andrew D B Leakey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Causes of decreased photosynthetic rate and metabolic capacity in water-deficient leaf cells: a critical evaluation of mechanisms and integration of processes.

Authors:  David W Lawlor; Wilmer Tezara
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves.

Authors:  S von Caemmerer; G D Farquhar
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.116

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Dynamic Hydro-Mechanical and Biochemical Model of Stomatal Conductance for C4 Photosynthesis.

Authors:  Chandra Bellasio; Joe Quirk; Thomas N Buckley; David J Beerling
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Response of photosynthesis, growth and water relations of a savannah-adapted tree and grass grown across high to low CO2.

Authors:  Joe Quirk; Chandra Bellasio; David A Johnson; David J Beerling
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.357

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.