Literature DB >> 16897724

Hippocampal place cells, context, and episodic memory.

David M Smith1, Sheri J Y Mizumori.   

Abstract

Although most observers agree that the hippocampus has a critical role in learning and memory, there remains considerable debate about the precise functional contribution of the hippocampus to these processes. Two of the most influential accounts hold that the primary function of the hippocampus is to generate cognitive maps and to mediate episodic memory processes. The well-documented spatial firing patterns (place fields) of hippocampal neurons in rodents, along with the spatial learning impairments observed with hippocampal damage support the cognitive mapping hypothesis. The amnesia for personally experienced events seen in humans with hippocampal damage and the data of animal models, which show severe memory deficits associated with hippocampal lesions, support the episodic memory account. Although an extensive literature supports each of these hypotheses, a specific contribution of place cells to episodic memory has not been clearly demonstrated. Recent data from our laboratory, together with previous findings, indicate that hippocampal place fields and neuronal responses to task-relevant stimuli are highly sensitive to the context, even when the contexts are defined by abstract task demands rather than the spatial geometry of the environment. On the basis of these findings, it is proposed that place fields reflect a more general context processing function of the hippocampus. Hippocampal context representations could serve to differentiate contexts and prime the relevant memories and behaviors. Since episodic memories, by definition, include information about the time and place where the episode occurred, contextual information is a necessary prerequisite for any episodic memory. Thus, place fields contribute importantly to episodic memory as part of the needed context representations. Additionally, recent findings indicate that hippocampal neurons differentiate contexts at progressively finer levels of detail, suggesting a hierarchical coding scheme which, if combined with temporal information, could provide a means of differentiating memory episodes. Copyright (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897724     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  89 in total

1.  Morphological changes in subregions of hippocampus and amygdala in major depressive disorder patients.

Authors:  Zhijun Yao; Yu Fu; Jianfeng Wu; Wenwen Zhang; Yue Yu; Zicheng Zhang; Xia Wu; Yalin Wang; Bin Hu
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.978

2.  Dopamine modulates synaptic plasticity in dendrites of rat and human dentate granule cells.

Authors:  Trevor J Hamilton; B Matthew Wheatley; D Barry Sinclair; Madeline Bachmann; Matthew E Larkum; William F Colmers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Complimentary roles of the hippocampus and retrosplenial cortex in behavioral context discrimination.

Authors:  David M Smith; Jennifer Barredo; Sheri J Y Mizumori
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  Behavioural and electrophysiological effects of visual paired associate context manipulations during encoding and recognition in younger adults, older adults and older cognitively declined adults.

Authors:  Michael J Hogan; Joanne P M Kenney; Richard A P Roche; Michael A Keane; Jennifer L Moore; Jochen Kaiser; Robert Lai; Neil Upton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The role of adult hippocampal neurogenesis in reducing interference.

Authors:  Paul Luu; Orriana C Sill; Lulu Gao; Suzanna Becker; Jan Martin Wojtowicz; David M Smith
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Expression of a heroin contextually conditioned immune effect in male rats requires CaMKIIα-expressing neurons in dorsal, but not ventral, subiculum and hippocampal CA1.

Authors:  Christina L Lebonville; Jacqueline E Paniccia; Shveta V Parekh; Lynde M Wangler; Meghan E Jones; Rita A Fuchs; Donald T Lysle
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 7.217

7.  The influence of low-level stimulus features on the representation of contexts, items, and their mnemonic associations.

Authors:  Derek J Huffman; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Cue and reward signals carried by monkey entorhinal cortex neurons during reward schedules.

Authors:  Yasuko Sugase-Miyamoto; Barry J Richmond
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Ventral tegmental area disruption selectively affects CA1/CA2 but not CA3 place fields during a differential reward working memory task.

Authors:  Adria K Martig; Sheri J Y Mizumori
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 10.  The form and function of hippocampal context representations.

Authors:  David M Smith; David A Bulkin
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.