Literature DB >> 20082295

Ventral tegmental area disruption selectively affects CA1/CA2 but not CA3 place fields during a differential reward working memory task.

Adria K Martig1, Sheri J Y Mizumori.   

Abstract

Hippocampus (HPC) receives dopaminergic (DA) projections from the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and substantia nigra. These inputs appear to provide a modulatory signal that influences HPC dependent behaviors and place fields. We examined how efferent projections from VTA to HPC influence spatial working memory and place fields when the reward context changes. CA1 and CA3 process environmental context changes differently and VTA preferentially innervates CA1. Given these anatomical data and electrophysiological evidence that implicate DA in reward processing, we predicted that CA1 place fields would respond more strongly to both VTA disruption and changes in the reward context than CA3 place fields. Rats (N = 9) were implanted with infusion cannula targeting VTA and recording tetrodes aimed at HPC. Then they were tested on a differential reward, win-shift working memory task. One recording session consisted of 5 baseline and 5 manipulation trials during which place cells in CA1/CA2 (N = 167) and CA3 (N = 94) were recorded. Prior to manipulation trials rats were infused with either baclofen or saline and then subjected to control or reward conditions during which the learned locations of large and small reward quantities were reversed. VTA disruption resulted in an increase in errors, and in CA1/CA2 place field reorganization. There were no changes in any measures of CA3 place field stability during VTA disruption. Reward manipulations did not affect performance or place field stability in CA1/CA2 or CA3; however, changes in the reward locations "rescued" performance and place field stability in CA1/CA2 when VTA activity was compromised, perhaps by trigging compensatory mechanisms. These data support the hypothesis that VTA contributes to spatial working memory performance perhaps by maintaining place field stability selectively in CA1/CA2.
Copyright © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20082295      PMCID: PMC2988981          DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  41 in total

1.  Increased attention to spatial context increases both place field stability and spatial memory.

Authors:  Clifford G Kentros; Naveen T Agnihotri; Samantha Streater; Robert D Hawkins; Eric R Kandel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Parallel processing across neural systems: implications for a multiple memory system hypothesis.

Authors:  Sheri J Y Mizumori; Oksana Yeshenko; Kathryn M Gill; Denise M Davis
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 3.  The three-dimensional organization of the hippocampal formation: a review of anatomical data.

Authors:  D G Amaral; M P Witter
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  D1 dopamine receptors in prefrontal cortex: involvement in working memory.

Authors:  T Sawaguchi; P S Goldman-Rakic
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Comparison of spatial and temporal characteristics of neuronal activity in sequential stages of hippocampal processing.

Authors:  C A Barnes; B L McNaughton; S J Mizumori; B W Leonard; L H Lin
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.453

6.  The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; J Dostrovsky
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Spatial memory impairment induced by lesion of the mesohippocampal dopaminergic system in the rat.

Authors:  A Gasbarri; A Sulli; R Innocenzi; C Pacitti; J D Brioni
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Dissociation of hippocampus and caudate nucleus memory systems by posttraining intracerebral injection of dopamine agonists.

Authors:  M G Packard; N M White
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons innervating the hippocampal formation in the rat: a combined retrograde tracing and immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  A Gasbarri; C Verney; R Innocenzi; E Campana; C Pacitti
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-12-30       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  The ventral tegmental area is required for the behavioral and nucleus accumbens neuronal firing responses to incentive cues.

Authors:  Irene A Yun; Ken T Wakabayashi; Howard L Fields; Saleem M Nicola
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  34 in total

1.  Transgenically targeted rabies virus demonstrates a major monosynaptic projection from hippocampal area CA2 to medial entorhinal layer II neurons.

Authors:  David C Rowland; Aldis P Weible; Ian R Wickersham; Haiyan Wu; Mark Mayford; Menno P Witter; Clifford G Kentros
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Combined administration of levetiracetam and valproic acid attenuates age-related hyperactivity of CA3 place cells, reduces place field area, and increases spatial information content in aged rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Jonathan Robitsek; Marcia H Ratner; Tara Stewart; Howard Eichenbaum; David H Farb
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Hippocampal neural activity reflects the economy of choices during goal-directed navigation.

Authors:  Valerie L Tryon; Marsha R Penner; Shawn W Heide; Hunter O King; Joshua Larkin; Sheri J Y Mizumori
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  Hippocampal CA2 activity patterns change over time to a larger extent than between spatial contexts.

Authors:  Emily A Mankin; Geoffrey W Diehl; Fraser T Sparks; Stefan Leutgeb; Jill K Leutgeb
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Ventral tegmental area D2 receptor knockdown enhances choice impulsivity in a delay-discounting task in rats.

Authors:  Kimberly A Bernosky-Smith; Yan-Yan Qiu; Malte Feja; Yun Beom Lee; Brian Loughlin; Jun-Xu Li; Caroline E Bass
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Memory-guided learning: CA1 and CA3 neuronal ensembles differentially encode the commonalities and differences between situations.

Authors:  Amir S Bahar; Prasad R Shirvalkar; Matthew L Shapiro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Learning place cells, grid cells and invariances with excitatory and inhibitory plasticity.

Authors:  Simon Nikolaus Weber; Henning Sprekeler
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Distinct medial temporal networks encode surprise during motivation by reward versus punishment.

Authors:  Vishnu P Murty; Kevin S LaBar; R Alison Adcock
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 9.  Rediscovering area CA2: unique properties and functions.

Authors:  Serena M Dudek; Georgia M Alexander; Shannon Farris
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  A role for the lateral dorsal tegmentum in memory and decision neural circuitry.

Authors:  Van Redila; Chantelle Kinzel; Yong Sang Jo; Corey B Puryear; Sheri J Y Mizumori
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.